The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drug Resistance in Epilepsy: Putative Neurobiologic and Clinical Mechanisms
Abstract
Summary: Drug‐resistant epilepsy with uncontrolled severe seizures despite state‐of‐the‐art medical treatment continues to be a major clinical problem for up to one in three patients with epilepsy. Although drug resistance may emerge or remit in the course of epilepsy or its treatment, in most patients, drug resistance seems to be continuous and to occur de novo. Unfortunately, current antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) do not seem to prevent or to reverse drug resistance in most patients, but add‐on therapy with novel AEDs is able to exert a modest seizure reduction in as many as 50% of patients in short‐term clinical trials, and a few become seizure free during the trial. It is not known why and how epilepsy becomes drug resistant, while other patients with seemingly identical seizure types can achieve seizure control with medication. Several putative mechanisms underlying drug resistance in epilepsy have been identified in recent years. Based on experimental and clinical studies, two major neurobiologic theories have been put forward: (a) removal of AEDs from the epileptogenic tissue through excessive expression of multidrug transporters, and (b) reduced drug‐target sensitivity in epileptogenic brain tissue. On the clinical side, genetic and clinical features and structural brain lesions have been associated with drug resistance in epilepsy. In this article, we review the laboratory and clinical evidence to date supporting the drug‐transport and the drug‐target hypotheses and provide directions for future research, to define more clearly the role of these hypotheses in the clinical spectrum of drug‐resistant epilepsy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early Identification of Refractory Epilepsy
Kwan, P., & Brodie, M. J. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002033420503 · Cited by 5,204
Kapur, J., & Macdonald, R. L. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-19-07532.1997 · Cited by 427
Channelopathies as a genetic cause of epilepsy
Mulley, J. C., Scheffer, I. E., Petrou, S., & Berkovic, S. F. (2003) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/00019052-200304000-00009 · Cited by 214
Cited by
New avenues for anti-epileptic drug discovery and development
Löscher, W., Klitgaard, H., Twyman, R. E., & Schmidt, D. (2013) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4126 · Cited by 675
Self-citationLöscher, W., & Brandt, C. (2010) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.110.003046 · Cited by 414
Self-citationNatural history of treated childhood-onset epilepsy: prospective, long-term population-based study
Sillanpää, M., & Schmidt, D. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh726 · Cited by 414
Self-citationIntractable epilepsy: management and therapeutic alternatives
Schuele, S. U., & Lüders, H. O. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70108-x · Cited by 344
Drug treatment of epilepsy in adults
Schmidt, D., & Schachter, S. C. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g254 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, D., & Löscher, W.
- Venue
- Epilepsia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 858-877
- ISSN
- 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1167
- OpenAlex
- W2021489157
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug Resistance in Epilepsy: Putative Neurobiologic and Clinical Mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.54904.x
- The paper
- Schmidt, D., & Löscher, W. (2005). Drug Resistance in Epilepsy: Putative Neurobiologic and Clinical Mechanisms. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.54904.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.