Cited by 57Epilepsy research and treatmentCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

A Comparison of Self‐reported Quality of Life between Patients with Epilepsy and Neurocardiogenic Syncope

Santhouse, Jacqueline, Carrier, Christine, Arya, Sanjay, Fowler, Helen, Duncan, Susan·2007·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Epilepsy and neurocardiogenic syncope share a final common pathway of loss of consciousness and consequent social disruption. We compared 52 patients with syncope, 96 with epilepsy and 100 controls. Epilepsy and syncope patients expressed significantly higher levels of anxiety and depression and reported significantly less good quality of life (QoL) compared with controls. There were no significant differences on any of the QoL parameters measured between the syncope and epilepsy patients. These findings suggest the main contributor to poor QoL in epilepsy may be the unpredictable loss of control that is the hallmark of the condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00971.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quality of life is reduced with recurrent syncope.

    “QoL is reduced with recurrent syncope (725–733), as demonstrated in studies that compared patients with and without syncope (727,731).”
  • There is consistent evidence that syncope is associated with worse function on multiple domains of quality of life, such as perceptions of low overall physical health; perception of mental health, including increased fear, somatization, depression, and anxiety; and impairment in activities of daily living, such as driving, working, and attending school.

    “There is consistent evidence that syncope is associated with worse function on multiple domains of QoL, such as perceptions of low overall physical health (725,730,734); perception of mental health, including increased fear, somatization, depression, and anxiety (725,727,728,731,734); and impairment in activities of daily living, such as driving, working, and attending school.”
  • Quality of life is reduced with recurrent syncope, as demonstrated in studies that compared patients with and without syncope.

    “QoL is reduced with recurrent syncope (397–405), as demonstrated in studies that compared patients with and without syncope (399,405).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santhouse, J., Carrier, C., Arya, S., Fowler, H., & Duncan, S.
Affiliations
  • Salford Royal Hospital (GB)
  • Royal Albert Edward Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Duncan, Susan
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-13
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
1019-1022
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W1991447793
Cited by
57
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
epilepsy, vasovagal syncope, quality of life, anxiety, depression, loss of consciousness, social disruption, self-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude to Health, Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Comorbidity, Sickness Impact Profile, Syncope, Vasovagal, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review