Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 677

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale: A Self‐Rated Instrument for the Quantification of Thoughts about Alcohol and Drinking Behavior

Anton, Raymond F., Moak, Darlene H., Latham, Patricia·1995·Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

It has been suggested that a crucial dimension of alcohol “craving” includes the concept of both obsessive thoughts about alcohol use and compulsive behaviors toward drinking. An interview‐based rating scale, the Yale‐Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale‐heavy drinkers (YBOCS‐hd), has been found useful in quantifying this concept in alcohol‐dependent individuals. A self‐rating scale, the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) has been developed by us as a modification of the YBOCS‐hd. The YBOCS‐hd showed excellent interrater reliability in our hands. The correlation between the YBOCS‐hd and the OCDS total scores obtained on 60 alcohol‐dependent individuals was 0.83. The test‐retest correlation for the OCDS total score was 0.96, and the obsessive and compulsive sub‐scales test‐retest correlations were 0.94 and 0.86, respectively. The internal consistency of the items in the OCDS was high (0.86) and did not improve significantly with removal of individual items. The shared variance between the OCDS scores and alcohol consumption during the period of evaluation was only = 20%, indicating that the dimension measured by the scale was somewhat independent of actual drinking. As such, it might act as an independent measure of the “state of illness” for alcohol‐dependent individuals. When used during a prospective 12‐week treatment research study, initial results indicate that the OCDS seems to validly measure a dimension of alcohol dependence, because it decreased from baseline during alcohol reduction and increased in relationship to relapse drinking. The ease of administration (5 min), reliability, and concurrent validity of the OCDS makes it particularly suitable as a screening and outcome measurement tool for various types of clinical treatment and research protocols.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb01475.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 677

Metadata

Authors
Anton, R. F., Moak, D. H., & Latham, P.
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-02
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
92-99
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W1979388674
Cited by
677
References
3
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale: A Self‐Rated Instrument for the Quantification of Thoughts about Alcohol and Drinking Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb01475.x
The paper
Anton, R. F., Moak, D. H., & Latham, P. (1995). The Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale: A Self‐Rated Instrument for the Quantification of Thoughts about Alcohol and Drinking Behavior. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb01475.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.