Cited by 48Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyCannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Common genetic contributions to alcohol and cannabis use and dependence symptomatology

Open access
Sartor, Carolyn E., Grant, Julia D., Bucholz, Kathleen K., Madden, Pamela A. F., Heath, Andrew C., Agrawal, Arpana, Whitfield, John B., Statham, Dixie J. +2 more·2010·Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite mounting evidence that use of and dependence on alcohol and cannabis are influenced by heritable factors, the extent to which heritable influences on these phenotypes overlap across the 2 substances has only rarely been explored. In the current study, we quantified cross-substance overlap in sources of variance and estimated the degree to which within-substance associations between use and dependence measures are attributable to common genetic and environmental factors for alcohol and cannabis. METHODS: The sample was comprised of 6,257 individuals (2,761 complete twin pairs and 735 singletons) from the Australian Twin Registry, aged 24 to 36 years. Alcohol and cannabis use histories were collected via telephone diagnostic interviews and used to derive an alcohol consumption factor, a frequency measure for cannabis use, and DSM-IV alcohol and cannabis dependence symptom counts. Standard genetic analyses were conducted to produce a quadrivariate model that provided estimates of overlap in genetic and environmental influences across the 4 phenotypes. RESULTS: Over 60% of variance in alcohol consumption, cannabis use, and cannabis dependence symptoms, and just under 50% of variance in alcohol dependence (AD) symptoms were attributable to genetic sources. Shared environmental factors did not contribute significantly to the 4 phenotypes. Nearly complete overlap in heritable influences was observed for within-substance measures of use and dependence symptoms. Genetic correlations across substances were 0.68 and 0.62 for use and dependence symptoms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Common heritable influences were evident for alcohol and cannabis use and for AD and cannabis dependence symptomatology, but findings indicate that substance-specific influences account for the majority of the genetic variance in the cannabis use and dependence phenotypes. By contrast, the substantial correlations between alcohol use and AD symptoms and between cannabis use and cannabis dependence symptoms suggest that measures of heaviness of use capture much of the same genetic liability to alcohol- and cannabis-related problems as dependence symptomatology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01120.x

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Profound comorbidity exists across diagnostic labels thought to separate internalizing and externalizing disorders, with high phenotypic correlations between diagnosis pairs.

    “Profound comorbidity exists across diagnostic labels thought to separate internalizing and externalizing disorders; such studies reveal high phenotypic correlations between diagnosis pairs (13,14).”

    From Methods and challenges for assessing heterogeneity (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sartor, C. E., Grant, J. D., Bucholz, K. K., Madden, P. A. F., Heath, A. C., Agrawal, A., Whitfield, J. B., Statham, D. J., Martin, N. G., & Lynskey, M. T.
Affiliations
University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
Venue
Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
545-554
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W2163592229
Cited by
48
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 21 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R37AA007728, K05AA017688, AA010248, AA 007728, R01AA010249, R01AA013321, AA011998, P50AA011998, AA13321, R01AA007728, AA017688, R01AA012640, AA013320, R01AA013320)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA018267, R01DA018660, R01DA018267, R01DA014363, DA018660, R01DA012854)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Keywords
alcohol consumption, cannabis use, alcoholism, cannabis use disorder, genetic overlap, heritability, genetic correlation, shared environmental factors, twin studies, Australian Twin Registry
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Australia, Marijuana Abuse, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Marijuana Smoking, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Comorbidity, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review