Cited by 422Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

Cannabis use disorders in the USA: prevalence, correlates and co-morbidity

STINSON, FREDERICK S., RUAN, W. JUNE, PICKERING, ROGER, GRANT, BRIDGET F.·2006·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background. The purpose of this study was to present 12-month and lifetime estimates of the prevalence, sociodemographic and clinical correlates, and psychiatric co-morbidity of DSM-IV cannabis abuse and dependence. Method. Data were derived from a large nationally representative survey (n=43093) of US adults. Results. The prevalence of 12-month and lifetime DSM-IV cannabis abuse (1·1% and 7·2%) exceeded the corresponding rates of cannabis dependence (0·3% and 1·3%). Being male, Native American, widowed/separated/divorced, and residing in the West increased the odds whereas being Black, Asian or Hispanic decreased the odds of cannabis abuse and dependence. Cannabis dependence was significantly associated with low income. Ages of onset for both cannabis use disorders occurred in adolescence and the majority of individuals with these disorders remained untreated. Co-morbidity was high between cannabis use disorders and other Axis I and II disorders. Conclusions. Cannabis use disorders continue to present a widespread and serious personal and public health problem. Native Americans were found to have high rates of cannabis use disorders, warranting closer attention to the mental health needs of this subgroup. Associations between cannabis abuse and dependence and Axis I and II disorders were strong, signaling the need for more comprehensive assessment of individuals with cannabis use disorders. Further controlled treatment studies are needed, especially among co-morbid individuals, in view of growing evidence of the adverse personal, medical and societal impacts of cannabis use disorders in the USA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291706008361

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These findings reflect the underlying association of anxiety disorders with each other and MDD within the internalizing component of the transdiagnostic spectrum.

    “These findings reflect the underlying association of anxiety disorders with each other and MDD within the internalizing component of the transdiagnostic spectrum.61”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
STINSON, F. S., RUAN, W. J., PICKERING, R., & GRANT, B. F.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2006-07-20
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
1447-1460
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2117159069
Cited by
422
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 28
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
cannabis use disorder, prevalence, sociodemographic correlates, psychiatric comorbidity, Native Americans, low income, age of onset, DSM-IV, United States adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Marijuana Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Age of Onset, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review