Cited by 80Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsBehavioral Health and Interventions

THE MIXED EVIDENCE FOR BRIEF INTERVENTION IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS, TRAUMA CARE CENTERS AND INPATIENT HOSPITAL SETTINGS: WHAT SHOULD WE DO?

Open access
Field, Craig A., Baird, Janette, Saitz, Richard, Caetano, Raul, Monti, Peter M.·2010·Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

Background: This qualitative review is based on a symposia presented at the 2009 annual conference of the Research Society on Alcoholism (Baird et al., 2009; Field et al., 2009; Monti et al., 2009; Saitz et al., 2009a). The purpose is to describe the mixed evidence supporting brief interventions in the emergency department, trauma care, and in‐patient medical care settings; examine potential moderators of treatment outcome in light of the mixed evidence; and identify methods to move the research and practice of brief interventions beyond their current state. Methods: By drawing upon existing reviews and selected individual studies, we provide examples that reflect the current complexity of research in this area and propose steps for advancing the field. Results: Emergency departments, inpatient hospital settings, and trauma care settings represent three unique contexts within which brief interventions have been tested. While the general efficacy of brief alcohol interventions in these settings has been recognized, the evidence is increasingly mixed. Recent studies investigating potential moderators of treatment outcomes suggest that a more sophisticated approach to evaluating the effectiveness of brief interventions across varying patient populations is needed to further understand its effectiveness. Conclusions: Current dissemination efforts represent a significant advance in broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems by providing an evidence‐based intervention in health care settings and should not be curtailed. However, additional research is required to enhance treatment outcomes, refine current practice guidelines, and continue to bridge the gap between science and practice. Given the current state of research, a multisetting clinical trial is recommended to account for potential contextual differences while controlling for study design.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01297.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Baird J Nilsen P Longabaugh R Mello M Nirenberg T Lee C Woolard R 2009 A review of brief intervention studies conducted in emergency departments: a focus on moderators of treatment outcomes Alcohol Clin Exp Res 33 269A
  2. Saitz R Palfai TP Cheng DM Horton NJ Dukes K Kraemer KL Roberts MS Guerriero RT Samet JH 2009b Some medical inpatients with unhealthy alcohol use may benefit from brief intervention J Stud Alcohol Drugs 70 426 435 19371494 PMC2670748

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Field, C. A., Baird, J., Saitz, R., Caetano, R., & Monti, P. M.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Field, Craig A.
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-22
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
2004-2010
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W1518659053
Cited by
80
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01013824)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA017895, R01AA013824, R01AA009835, R01AA013709)
  • National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
brief alcohol intervention, emergency department, moderators of treatment outcome, dissemination of evidence-based interventions, alcohol problems, clinical guidelines
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Emergency Service, Hospital, Hospitals, Humans, Psychotherapy, Brief, Trauma Centers, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review