Cited by 49Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsHomelessness and Social Issues

Screening and brief interventions for hazardous and harmful alcohol use among hospital outpatients in South Africa: results from a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Pengpid, Supa, Peltzer, Karl, Skaal, Linda, Van der Heever, Hendry·2013·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High prevalence rates of hazardous and harmful alcohol use have been found in a hospital outpatient setting in South Africa. Hospital settings are a particularly valuable point of contact for the delivery of brief interventions because of the large access to patient populations each year. With this in mind, the primary purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to provide screening for alcohol misuse and to test the effectiveness of brief interventions in reducing alcohol intake among hospital outpatients in South Africa. METHODS: The study design for this effectiveness study is a randomized controlled trial with 6- and 12-month follow-ups to examine the effects of a brief alcohol intervention to reduce alcohol use by hazardous or harmful drinkers in a hospital setting. Outpatients were screened for alcohol problems, and those identified as hazardous or harmful drinkers were randomized into an experimental or control group. The experimental group received one brief counselling session on alcohol risk reduction, while the control group received a health education leaflet. RESULTS: Of the 1419 screened for alcohol misuse who agreed to participate in the trial 392 (27.6%) screened positive for hazardous or harmful use on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) (score 7/8-19) and 51 (3.6%) had an AUDIT score of 20 or more. Among the 282 (72%) hospital outpatients who also attended the 12-month follow-up session, the time effects on the AUDIT scores were significant [F (1,195 = 7.72), P < 0.01] but the intervention effect on the AUDIT score was statistically not significant [F (1,194 = 0.06), P < 0.804]. CONCLUSION: Given the lack of difference in outcome between control and intervention group, alcohol screening and the provision of an alcohol health education leaflet may in itself cause reduction in drinking. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PACTR201110000319392.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-13-644

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Single-session brief interventions resulted in reduced alcohol use at 3 months.

    “Concerning alcohol use, single session BI resulted in reduced use at month 1 [50,54]; 6 weeks [72], 3 months [50,61–64], and 6 months [50,52,60,72].”

    From A scoping review of substance use brief interventions in Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Methods describe a one-session, 20-minute intervention, and the Results report reduced alcohol-use scores over time in both the intervention and control groups. But the Methods specify assessments at 6 and 12 months, not 3 months, and the Results find no statistically significant effect attributable to the intervention compared with control. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some studies reported no intervention effect on alcohol use at month 12.

    “Other studies reported no intervention effect on alcohol use at month 3 [44], month 5 [58], month 6 [59,64,68] and month 12 [58,64].”
  • Some studies reported no intervention effect on alcohol use at month 6.

    “Other studies reported no intervention effect on alcohol use at month 3 [44], month 5 [58], month 6 [59,64,68] and month 12 [58,64].”
  • Some studies found a similar reduction in alcohol-related outcomes between both intervention and control groups (null effect).

    “However, there were some studies that found a similar reduction in alcohol-related outcomes between both the intervention and control groups, thus a null effect [22,28,30,79,80,82,88].”
  • Brief interventions at the primary care setting addressing alcohol and other substances reduced alcohol use for both intervention and control arms equally.

    “Assangkornchai and Pengpid found brief interventions at the primary care setting addressing alcohol and other substances reduced alcohol use for both intervention and control arms equally [28,80,82].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pengpid, S., Peltzer, K., Skaal, L., & Van der Heever, H.
Affiliations
  • Mahidol University (TH)
  • Human Sciences Research Council (ZA)
  • Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Pengpid, Supa
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2013-07-11
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
644-644
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971026092
Cited by
49
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vlaamse Interuniversitaire Raad
  • VLIRUOS
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
hazardous drinking, alcohol screening, brief intervention, hospital outpatients, alcohol counseling, health education leaflets, auditing, South Africa
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Alcoholism, Counseling, Female, Health Education, Hospitals, Humans, Male, Outpatients, South Africa, Risk Reduction Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review