Cited by 117Traffic and Road SafetySubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

The Relationship Between Alcohol Consumption and Fatal Motor Vehicle Injury: High Risk at Low Alcohol Levels

Open access
Taylor, Benjamin, Rehm, Jürgen·2012·Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

Background: Alcohol consumption causes motor vehicle accident (MVA) injury in a dose–response fashion. However, the relationship between how this risk is different with respect to fatal and nonfatal outcomes is not clear. A meta‐analysis has already been completed for alcohol consumption and nonfatal MVA injury, but none exists for fatal injury. Thus, an analysis of the acute dose–response relationship between alcohol and motor vehicle injury death is warranted to generate single occasion‐ and dose‐specific relative risks for the first time. Methods: A systematic literature review and inverse‐variance weighted, random effects meta‐analysis were conducted to fill this gap. Fractional polynomial regression was used to model the dose–response relationship. Usual tests of heterogeneity and publication bias were run. Results: Five studies meeting the inclusion criteria of this analysis were selected. At all levels of blood alcohol concentration (BAC), the odds ratio (OR) of fatal motor vehicle injury was significant. Overall, the 5 combined studies yielded an OR of fatal injury of 1.74 (95% CI: 1.43–2.14) for every 0.02% increase in BAC. At 0.08, the legal limit in most countries, the OR was 13.0 (95% CI: 11.1–15.2). Conclusions: This study is able to definitively show and quantify, for the first time, the significantly increased OR for fatal motor vehicle injury. This analysis showed some evidence of both study heterogeneity and publication bias, likely due to the increased variation we could expect from a small study number. The alcohol‐caused fatal motor vehicle injury literature is sparse with respect to dose–response information. More studies investigating this relationship and other injury types are recommended in this area to be able to calculate stable estimates of risk overall and by injury type specifically.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01785.x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dose-response relationship between acute alcohol use, measured through the blood alcohol concentration and injury, seems exponential for all injury types, albeit varying slightly by type of injury.

    “The dose–response relationship between acute alcohol use, measured through the blood alcohol concentration and injury, seem exponential for all injury types, albeit varying slightly by type of injury 311, 312, 313.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, B., & Rehm, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Benjamin
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-07
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
1827-1834
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W2135392056
Cited by
117
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (HHSN267200700041C)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (HHSN267200700041C)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
alcohol consumption, blood alcohol concentration, dose-response relationship, drunk driving, traffic fatalities, relative risk
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Automobile Driving, Humans, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Motor Vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review