Cited by 142Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Continuous Objective Monitoring of Alcohol Use: Twenty‐First Century Measurement Using Transdermal Sensors

Open access

Abstract

Transdermal alcohol sensors continuously collect reliable and valid data on alcohol consumption in vivo over the course of hours to weeks. Transdermal alcohol readings are highly correlated with breath alcohol measurements, but transdermal alcohol levels lag behind breath alcohol levels by one or more hours owing to the longer time required for alcohol to be expelled through perspiration. By providing objective information about alcohol consumption, transdermal alcohol sensors can validate self‐report and provide important information not previously available. In this article, we describe the development and evaluation of currently available transdermal alcohol sensors, present the strengths and limitations of the technology, and give examples of recent research using the sensors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01869.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Greenfield TK, 2005, A pilot study of self‐report alcohol consumption diary vs. transdermal alcohol sensor accuracy, Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 29, 103A

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 142

Metadata

Authors
Leffingwell, T. R., Cooney, N. J., Murphy, J. G., Luczak, S., Rosen, G., Dougherty, D. M., & Barnett, N. P.
Affiliations
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
  • University of Memphis (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Leffingwell, Thad R.
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-23
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
16-22
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W2056885389
Cited by
142
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R21AA017711, R21AA015980, R21AA020943, R01AA014988)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
alcohol consumption monitoring, breath alcohol, self-report validation, sweating
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Central Nervous System Depressants, Humans, Sweat, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Alcohol-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review