The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Construction Matters: Comparing Environmental Impacts of Building Modular and Conventional Homes in the United States
Abstract
Summary: Modular construction practices are used in many countries as an alternative to conventional on‐site construction for residential homes. While modular home construction has certain advantages in terms of material and time efficiency, it requires a different infrastructure than conventional home construction, and the overall environmental trade‐offs between the two methods have been unclear. This study uses life cycle assessment to quantify the environmental impacts of constructing a typical residential home using the two methods, based on data from several modular construction companies and conventional homebuilders. The study includes impacts from material production and transport, off‐site and on‐site energy use, worker transport, and waste management. For all categories considered, the average impacts of building the home are less for modular construction than for conventional construction, although these averages obscure significant variation among the individual projects and companies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Quale et al. (2012) found that prefabricated wood 121 constructions reduce wood waste from construction activities to nearly zero due to efficient 122 fabrication and the reuse of surplus material, whereas conventional wood constructions waste 123 about 5 to 15% of the wood used in their building.”
From Design strategies to increase the reuse of wood materials in buildings: Lessons from architectural practice (2022) · cites this paper as Quale et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“By contrast, concrete reinforcement bars have a low potential for reuse [86], but the use of modular constructions opens new opportunities [91].”
From Material efficiency strategies to reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with buildings, vehicles, and electronics—a review (2019) · cites this paper as [91]
Citations
Cites
A review on buildings energy consumption information
Pérez-Lombard, L., Ortiz, J., & Pout, C. (2008) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.007 · Cited by 6,649 · cited 2×
“Quantitatively, buildings account for 40% of energy use in the United States and a comparatively significant proportion elsewhere (Pérez-Lombard et al. 2008; DOE 2008).”
BackgroundSustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA
Ortiz, O., Castells, F., & Sonnemann, G. (2008) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012 · Cited by 1,344
Scheuer, C. W., Keoleian, G. A., & Reppe, P. (2003) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/s0378-7788(03)00066-5 · Cited by 735
Life-cycle energy use in office buildings
Cole, R. J., & Kernan, P. C. (1996) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/0360-1323(96)00017-0 · Cited by 520
Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings
Gustavsson, L., & Joelsson, A. (2009) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.08.017 · Cited by 447
Comparison of Environmental Effects of Steel- and Concrete-Framed Buildings
Guggemos, A. A., & Horvath, A. (2005) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2005)11:2(93 · Cited by 355
Cole, R. J. (1998) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/s0360-1323(98)00020-1 · Cited by 339
Life-Cycle Environmental Effects of an Office Building
Junnila, S., & Horvath, A. (2003) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2003)9:4(157 · Cited by 324
Prefab Architecture: A Guide to Modular Design and Construction
Timberlake, J., & Smith, R. E. (2010) · Cited by 296
Energy use during the life cycle of single-unit dwellings: Examples
Adalberth, K. (1997) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/s0360-1323(96)00069-8 · Cited by 292
Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes
Bilec, M. M., Ries, R. J., Matthews, H. S., & Sharrard, A. L. (2006) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2006)12:4(207 · Cited by 247
Life‐Cycle Energy, Costs, and Strategies for Improving a Single‐Family House
Keoleian, G. A., Blanchard, S., & Reppe, P. (2000) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/108819800569726 · Cited by 246
Comparing environmental impacts of renovated housing stock with new construction
Itard, L., & Klunder, G. (2007) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613210601068161 · Cited by 173
Gangolells, M., Casals, M., Gassó, S., Forcada, N., Roca, X., & Fuertes, A. (2008) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.001 · Cited by 159
A hybrid life cycle assessment method for construction
Treloar, G. J., Love, P. E. D., Faniran, O. O., & Iyer‐Raniga, U. (2000) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/014461900370898 · Cited by 159
Economic Input-output Life-cycle Assessment of U.S. Residential Buildings
Ochoa, L., Hendrickson, C. T., & Matthews, H. S. (2002) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2002)8:4(132 · Cited by 119
How to Make Housing Sustainable? The Dutch Experience
Priemus, H. (2005) · Environment and Planning B Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b3050 · Cited by 106
Saving Energy versus Saving Materials
Nishioka, Y., Yanagisawa, Y., & Spengler, J. D. (2000) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/108819800569212 · Cited by 21
AUTMOD3: The Integration of Design and Planning Tools for Automatic Modular Construction
Diez, R., Padrón, V., Abderrahim, M., & Balaguer, C. (2007) · International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems · doi:10.5772/5671 · Cited by 17
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Britto J. N.Dejonghe M.Dubuisson andK.Schmandt.2007.Business plan for green modular housing.Master's thesis Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management University of California Santa Barbara CA USA .
- DOE (Department of Energy), 2008, Energy efficiency trends in residential and commercial buildings
- DSM Environmental Services, 2008, 2007 Massachusetts construction and demolition debris industry study
- EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)., 2009, Estimating 2003 building‐related construction and demolition materials and amounts
- Kim D.2008.Preliminary life cycle analysis of modular and conventional housing in Benton Harbor Michigan .Master's thesis School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA .
- Kohler N., 2003, Life‐cycle analysis of the built environment. UNEP, Industry and Environment, 26, 17–21
- Malin N., 2005, Life cycle assessment for whole buildings: Seeking the holy grail, Building Design & Construction, 6
- NAHB (National Association of Home Builders), 1997, Residential construction waste management, a buyer's field guide: How to save money and landfill space
- NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), 2007, Building for environmental and economic sustainability (BEES)
- Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 2010, A life cycle approach to prioritizing methods of preventing waste from the residential construction sector in the state of Oregon
- Sharrard A. L.2007.Greening construction processes using an input‐output‐based hybrid life cycle assessment model.Doctoral thesis Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh PA .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ferdous, W., Bai, Y., Ngo, T., Manalo, A. C., & Mendis, P. A. (2019) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.061 · Cited by 688
Life cycle performance of modular buildings: A critical review
Kamali, M. H., & Hewage, K. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.031 · Cited by 703
Hertwich, E. G., Ali, S., Ciacci, L., Fishman, T., Heeren, N., Masanet, E., Asghari, F. N., Olivetti, E., Pauliuk, S., Tu, Q., et al. (2019) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab0fe3 · Cited by 477
On-site autonomous construction robots: Towards unsupervised building
Melenbrink, N., Werfel, J., & Menges, A. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103312 · Cited by 374
Performance Review of Prefabricated Building Systems and Future Research in Australia
Navaratnam, S., Ngo, T., Gunawardena, T., & Henderson, D. J. (2019) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings9020038 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Quale, J., Eckelman, M. J., Williams, K. W., Sloditskie, G., & Zimmerman, J. B.
- Corresponding author
- Eckelman, Matthew J.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Published
- 2012-03-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-253
- ISSN
- 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9290
- OpenAlex
- W2007072372
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Keywords
- modular construction, residential housing, environmental impact of construction, life cycle assessment, offsite construction, construction energy use, construction waste management, environmental trade-offs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
