Cited by 52Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingNutrition and Health Studies

A Practical Equation to Predict Resting Metabolic Rate in Older Females

Arciero, Paul J., Goran, Michael I., Gardner, Andrew M., Ades, Philip A., Tyzbir, Robert S., Poehlman, Eric T.·1993·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objective : To develop a practical and accurate age‐specific equation for predicting resting metabolic rate (RMR) in older women and, thereafter, to cross‐validate existing equations for predicting RMR in older females. Design : Cross‐sectional validation study. Setting : General Clinical Research Center. Participants : A convenience sample of 75 healthy older women (age 50–81) free of significant cardiovascular or any other non‐cardiac disease that may affect cardiovascular function or metabolic rate. Measurements : All 75 volunteers were characterized for resting metabolic rate (RMR), body composition, anthropometrics, physical activity, and energy intake. Results : A practical equation for predicting RMR in older women using easily measured variables was: [RMR (kcal/d) = 7.8 (weight, kg) + 4.7 (standing height, cm) − 39.5 (menopausal status; 1–3) + 143.5]. These variables accounted for 59% (R 2 ) of the variation in RMR and predicted RMR within ±66 kcal/d. When five previously published equations were applied to our sample of older women to predict RMR, individual predicted values deviated by −31% to 20% from the measured value. Conclusion : We offer a practical equation to predict RMR in healthy older women based on a measure of body weight, standing height, and menopausal status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06946.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arciero, P. J., Goran, M. I., Gardner, A. M., Ades, P. A., Tyzbir, R. S., & Poehlman, E. T.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-04
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
389-395
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2051374935
Cited by
52
References
32
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG07857, AG-00426, AG00564)
  • Rocky Mountain Research Station
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
resting metabolic rate, older women, energy expenditure prediction equations, menopausal status, body weight, standing height, body composition, energy intake
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Basal Metabolism, Body Composition, Body Height, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Energy Metabolism, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Leisure Activities, Menopause, Middle Aged, Oxygen Consumption, Predictive Value of Tests, Regression Analysis, Sex Characteristics, Skinfold Thickness, Vermont, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review