Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 561

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Type of Fall and Risk of Hip and Wrist Fractures: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures

Nevitt, Michael C., Cummings, Steven R., Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group·1993·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objective : To determine the causes of hip or wrist fractures. Design : Case‐control analysis nested in a prospective cohort study. Setting : Four clinical centers in Baltimore, Maryland, Minneapolis Minnesota, Portland, Oregon, and Monessen, Pennsylvania. Participants : Non‐black women age 65 and older living in the community. Measurements : We measured bone density, arm strength, and anthropometric characteristics at a baseline examination. Those who subsequently suffered hip ( n = 130) or wrist ( n = 294) fractures as a result of a fall and a consecutive sample of those who fell without a fracture ( n = 467) were interviewed about their falls. Results : In multivariate analyses, those who suffered hip fractures were more likely to have fallen sideways or straight down (odds ratio 3.3; 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 5.6) and to have landed on or near the hip (32.5; 9.9, 107.1) than women who fell without a fracture. Among women who fell on the hip, those with hip fractures were taller (1.5; 1.2, 2.2 per SD increase), less likely to have landed on a hand (0.3; 0.1 to 0.6) or to break the fall by grabbing or hitting an object (0.4; 0.2, 0.9), had weaker triceps (1.7; 1.2, 2.5 per SD decrease), and were more likely to land on a hard surface (2.8; 1.4, 5.5) than those without fractures. Women with wrist fractures were more likely to have fallen backward (2.2; 1.3, 3.8) and to have landed on a hand (20.4; 11.5, 36.0) than those who fell without a fracture. Among women who fell on the hand, those with wrist fractures were taller (1.4; 1.1, 1.8 per SD increase) and less likely to break the fall by grabbing or hitting an object (0.4; 0.2, 0.7). Among women who fell on their hip or hand, the risk of fracturing that site more than doubled for each standard deviation decrease in bone density at the site of fracture. Conclusions : The nature of the fall determines the type of fracture, while bone density and factors that increase or attenuate the force of impact of the fall determine whether a fracture will occur when a faller lands on a particular bone. These findings have important implications for prevention of fractures in older women.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb07307.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 561

Metadata

Authors
Nevitt, M. C., Cummings, S. R., & Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-11
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
1226-1234
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W3178227119
Cited by
561
References
21
FWCI
40.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Type of Fall and Risk of Hip and Wrist Fractures: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb07307.x
The paper
Nevitt, M. C., Cummings, S. R., & Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. (1993). Type of Fall and Risk of Hip and Wrist Fractures: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb07307.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.