Cited by 77Influenza Virus Research StudiesGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesInfection Control in Healthcare

Report of an outbreak: nursing home architecture and influenza-A attack rates

Drinka, Paul J., Krause, Peggy, Schilling, Margo, Miller, Barbara A., Shult, Peter, Gravenstein, Stefan·1996·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors that might account for a significantly lower attack rate in a newly constructed nursing building during an epidemic of type A influenza. SETTING: A four‐building, long‐term care facility for veterans and their spouses, with an average daily census of 690. DESIGN: Prospective surveillance with retrospective analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Symptomatic residents submitting to viral culture. MEASUREMENTS: Number of respiratory illnesses and influenza cultures in consenting symptomatic residents. Building characteristics RESULTS: An influenza A (H3N2) outbreak was culture‐confirmed in 68 nursing home residents. Influenza A was isolated in 3/184 (2%) residents in Building A, 31/196 (16%) in Building B, 18/194 (9%) in Building C, and 16/116 (14%) in Building D. Denominators are average daily census during the outbreak. Building A had significantly fewer culture‐confirmed cases than the other buildings ( P < .001). Fewer residents in Building A, 47% compared with 61% in Buildings B, C, and D, were participants in a formal study of influenza. Eight of 15 respiratory illnesses identified during the outbreak that were not cultured occurred in Building A. These factors could not account for the difference in attack rates. Building A has a unique ventilation system, more square feet of public space per resident, and does not contain office space that serves the entire four‐building facility. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective observation suggests that architectural design may influence the attack rate of influenza A in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 44:910–913,1996.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01859.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drinka, P. J., Krause, P., Schilling, M., Miller, B. A., Shult, P., & Gravenstein, S.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Gravenstein, Stefan
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-08
Volume
44
Issue
8
Pages
910-913
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2040946394
Cited by
77
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag009632-04)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 00548, AG 09632)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
influenza A virus, H3N2, nursing homes, outbreak, attack rate, building architecture, ventilation systems, long-term care facilities, veterans, respiratory diseases, facility design
MeSH terms
Disease Outbreaks, Facility Design and Construction, Female, Health Status, Humans, Influenza, Human, Long-Term Care, Male, Nursing Homes, Influenza A virus, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Ventilation, Wisconsin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review