Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long‐Term Prediction of Incident Hip Fracture Risk in Elderly White Women: Study of Osteoporotic Fractures

Taylor, Brent C., Schreiner, Pamela J., Stone, Katie L., Fink, Howard A., Cummings, Steven R., Nevitt, Michael C., Bowman, Paula J., Ensrud, Kristine E.·2004·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To identify independent risk factors for first hip fracture over 10 years of follow‐up. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Four U.S. clinical centers. Participants: A total of 6,787 women aged 66 and older in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Measurements: Total hip bone mineral density (BMD) using dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry and a comprehensive set of potential risk factors were collected. Incident hip fractures were identified prospectively and confirmed using radiographic report. Results: Six hundred two women (8.9%) had a hip fracture during a mean ±standard deviation (SD) follow‐up of 10.1±3.2 years. Older age, previous self‐reported fracture after age 50, maternal history of hip fracture after age 50, greater height at age 25, impaired cognition, slower walking speed, nulliparity, type II diabetes mellitus, Parkinson's disease, and depth perception each independently predicted a 1.17‐ to 1.83‐fold increase in hip fracture risk, whereas each SD (0.13 g/cm 2 ) decrease in hip BMD was independently associated with a 1.84‐fold increase in risk. Lower body mass index also was associated with an increased risk of hip fracture, although lower hip BMD largely explained this association . Conclusion: Although hip BMD is strongly related to hip fracture risk in elderly white women, other clinical risk factors also are independent predictors of long‐term risk and provide additional insight into the prevention of fracture in high‐risk women. Clinicians should be alert to factors other than BMD that place older women at a high risk of hip fracture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52410.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, B. C., Schreiner, P. J., Stone, K. L., Fink, H. A., Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., Bowman, P. J., & Ensrud, K. E.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-16
Volume
52
Issue
9
Pages
1479-1486
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1525779636
Cited by
267
References
3
FWCI
18.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐Term Prediction of Incident Hip Fracture Risk in Elderly White Women: Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52410.x
The paper
Taylor, B. C., Schreiner, P. J., Stone, K. L., Fink, H. A., Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., Bowman, P. J., & Ensrud, K. E. (2004). Long‐Term Prediction of Incident Hip Fracture Risk in Elderly White Women: Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52410.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.