Cited by 757Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareCancer survivorship and care

Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer

Open access
Haun, Markus W, Estel, Stephanie, Rücker, Gerta, Friederich, Hans-Christoph, Villalobos, Matthias, Thomas, Michael, Hartmann, Mechthild·2017·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incurable cancer, which often constitutes an enormous challenge for patients, their families, and medical professionals, profoundly affects the patient's physical and psychosocial well-being. In standard cancer care, palliative measures generally are initiated when it is evident that disease-modifying treatments have been unsuccessful, no treatments can be offered, or death is anticipated. In contrast, early palliative care is initiated much earlier in the disease trajectory and closer to the diagnosis of incurable cancer. OBJECTIVES: To compare effects of early palliative care interventions versus treatment as usual/standard cancer care on health-related quality of life, depression, symptom intensity, and survival among adults with a diagnosis of advanced cancer. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, OpenGrey (a database for grey literature), and three clinical trial registers to October 2016. We checked reference lists, searched citations, and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-randomised controlled trials (cRCTs) on professional palliative care services that provided or co-ordinated comprehensive care for adults at early advanced stages of cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane. We assessed risk of bias, extracted data, and collected information on adverse events. For quantitative synthesis, we combined respective results on our primary outcomes of health-related quality of life, survival (death hazard ratio), depression, and symptom intensity across studies in meta-analyses using an inverse variance random-effects model. We expressed pooled effects as standardised mean differences (SMDs, or Hedges' adjusted g). We assessed certainty of evidence at the outcome level using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) and created a 'Summary of findings' table. MAIN RESULTS: We included seven randomised and cluster-randomised controlled trials that together recruited 1614 participants. Four studies evaluated interventions delivered by specialised palliative care teams, and the remaining studies assessed models of co-ordinated care. Overall, risk of bias at the study level was mostly low, apart from possible selection bias in three studies and attrition bias in one study, along with insufficient information on blinding of participants and outcome assessment in six studies.Compared with usual/standard cancer care alone, early palliative care significantly improved health-related quality of life at a small effect size (SMD 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 0.38; participants analysed at post treatment = 1028; evidence of low certainty). As re-expressed in natural units (absolute change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) score), health-related quality of life scores increased on average by 4.59 (95% CI 2.55 to 6.46) points more among participants given early palliative care than among control participants. Data on survival, available from four studies enrolling a total of 800 participants, did not indicate differences in efficacy (death hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.28; evidence of very low certainty). Levels of depressive symptoms among those receiving early palliative care did not differ significantly from levels among those receiving usual/standard cancer care (five studies; SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.03; participants analysed at post treatment = 762; evidence of very low certainty). Results from seven studies that analysed 1054 participants post treatment suggest a small effect for significantly lower symptom intensity in early palliative care compared with the control condition (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.10; evidence of low certainty). The type of model used to provide early palliative care did not affect study results. One RCT reported potential adverse events of early palliative care, such as a higher percentage of participants with severe scores for pain and poor appetite; the remaining six studies did not report adverse events in study publications. For these six studies, principal investigators stated upon request that they had not observed any adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review of a small number of trials indicates that early palliative care interventions may have more beneficial effects on quality of life and symptom intensity among patients with advanced cancer than among those given usual/standard cancer care alone. Although we found only small effect sizes, these may be clinically relevant at an advanced disease stage with limited prognosis, at which time further decline in quality of life is very common. At this point, effects on mortality and depression are uncertain. We have to inte

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd011129.pub2

Cites

166 of 166 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with advanced cancer have a higher risk of mental health problems, including mood disorders, depressive symptoms, cognitive disorders, anxiety, insomnia, and death ideas.

    “Las personas con cáncer avanzado presentan aún mayor riesgo de presentar problemas de salud mental (8-10) , con prevalencias elevadas de trastornos del estado de ánimo y síntomas depresivos, trastornos cognitivos, ansiedad, insomnio e ideas de muerte (11-13) .”

    From AVANZACT: protocolo e intervención psicoterapéutica en cáncer avanzado basados en Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso. (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Description of the condition section (page not provided) says advanced cancer puts patients’ psychological health at high risk and mentions mental confusion and psychological distress. The review also measures depressive symptoms. It does not establish the claimed elevated prevalence of the full list—mood and cognitive disorders, anxiety, insomnia, and ideas of death—or specify a comparison for the higher-risk claim. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Dowsett SM, Saul JL, Butow PN, Dunn SM, Boyer MJ, Findlow R, et al. Communication styles in the cancer consultation: preferences for a patient-centred approach. Psycho-Oncology 2000;9:147-56. [DOI: 10.1002/ (SICI)1099-1611(200003/04)9:2<147::AID-PON443>3.0.CO;2-X]
  2. Higgins 2011a Higgins JPT, Green S. Chapter 4: Guide to the contents of a Cochrane protocol and review. In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
  3. Higgins 2011b Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
  4. McDonald J, Swami N, Hannon B, Lo C, Pope A, Oza A, et al. Impact of early palliative care on caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: cluster randomised trial. Annals of Oncology 2016;[Epub ahead of print]:Sep 29. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/ mdw438] · DOI
  5. placebo.ab. Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer (Review) Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Appendix 3. Seach strategy for Embase (OvidSP) 1. exp Palliative Care/ 2. palliat*.tw.
  6. hospice*.tw. Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer (Review) Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Cochrane Library Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 9. ("end-stage disease*" or "end stage disease* or end-stage illness" or "end stage").tw.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haun, M. W., Estel, S., Rücker, G., Friederich, H.-C., Villalobos, M., Thomas, M., & Hartmann, M.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-12
Volume
2017
Issue
6
Pages
CD011129-CD011129
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2626539441
Cited by
757
References
166
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Ministero della Salute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of Nursing Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
early palliative care, advanced cancer, health-related quality of life, depression, symptom intensity, survival, palliative care team, psychosocial well-being, symptom management, end-of-life care, risk of bias, quality of evidence, adverse events, family caregivers
MeSH terms
Communication, Humans, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Physician-Patient Relations, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review