Cited by 98Economic and Financial Impacts of CancerHealthcare Policy and ManagementPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Regional Variation in Spending and Survival for Older Adults With Advanced Cancer

Open access
Brooks, Gabriel A., Li, Ling, Sharma, Dhruv B., Weeks, Jane C., Hassett, Michael J., Yabroff, K. Robin, Schrag, Deborah·2013·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medicare spending varies substantially across the United States. We evaluated the association between mean regional spending and survival in advanced cancer. METHODS: We identified 116 523 subjects with advanced cancer from 2002 to 2007, using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked data. Subjects were aged 65 years and older with non-small cell lung, colon, breast, prostate, or pancreas cancer. Of these subjects, 61 083 had incident advanced-stage cancer (incident cohort) and 98 935 had death from cancer (decedent cohort); 37% of subjects were included in both cohorts. Subjects were linked to one of 80 hospital referral regions within SEER areas. We estimated mean regional spending in both cohorts. We assessed the primary outcome, survival, in the incident cohort; the exposure measure was the quintile of regional spending in the decedent cohort. Survival in quintiles 2 through 5 was compared with that in quintile 1 (lowest spending quintile) using Cox regression models. RESULTS: From quintile 1 to 5, mean regional spending increased by 32% and 41% in the incident and decedent cohorts (incident cohort: $28 854 to $37 971; decedent cohort: $27 446 to $38 630). The association between spending and survival varied by cancer site and quintile; hazard ratios ranged from 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82 to 1.04, pancreas cancer quintile 5) to 1.24 (95% CI = 1.11 to 1.39, breast cancer quintile 3). In most cases, differences in survival between quintile 1 and quintiles 2 through 5 were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: There is substantial regional variation in Medicare spending for advanced cancer, yet no consistent association between mean regional spending and survival.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djt025

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Federal Register: Daily Journal of the United States Government. https:// www.federalregister.gov/articles/search?conditions[term]=wage+index. Accessed February 11, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brooks, G. A., Li, L., Sharma, D. B., Weeks, J. C., Hassett, M. J., Yabroff, K. R., & Schrag, D.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2013-03-12
Volume
105
Issue
9
Pages
634-642
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2150275080
Cited by
98
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
FWCI
25.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca131847-05)
  • National Cancer Institute (L30 CA179613, R01-CA131847, 5R01CA131847, T32CA009172)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
Medicare spending, regional variation, advanced cancer, cancer survival, older adults, hospital referral regions, health care costs, cancer site differences, SEER-Medicare linkage
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Health Expenditures, Female, Medicare, Hospitalization, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Medical Record Linkage, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, United States, Proportional Hazards Models, SEER Program, Patient-Centered Care, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review