Cited by 88Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Management and Opioid UsePharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Nonprescription use of pain relievers by middle-aged and elderly community-living adults: national survey on drug use and health

Open access
Blazer, Dan G., Wu, Li‐Tzy·2009·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the frequency, distribution, and correlates of nonprescription use of pain relievers by middle‐aged and elderly persons in the United States. DESIGN: Cross‐sectional data analysis of a national community survey. SETTING: The 2005 and 2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. PARTICIPANTS: Ten thousand nine hundred fifty‐three respondents aged 50 and older (6,717 aged 50–64 and 4,236 aged ≥65). MEASUREMENTS: Social and demographic variables, detailed assessment of nonprescription use (and abuse) of prescription pain relievers (e.g., acetaminophen with codeine, morphine), substance use, major depression, self‐reported medical illnesses, and self‐rated health. RESULTS: A small proportion of the sample (1.4%) reported nonprescription use of prescription pain relievers during the previous year. Combinations of acetaminophen and hydrocodone or propoxyphene were the most commonly used drugs. Use was associated with younger age (odds ratio (OR)=2.39, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.31–4.36), American Indian and Alaska native (OR=8.78, 95% CI=2.50–30.85), and use of marijuana (OR=7.07, 95% CI=3.99–12.53). Fewer than 10% of nonprescription users were abusing these medications or dependent upon them. CONCLUSION: In a representative sample of middle‐aged and older adults, nonprescription use of prescription pain relievers is relatively uncommon, but the much higher use by middle‐aged adults suggests that, as this cohort ages, the problem may increase in elderly people.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02306.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • APAP overdose is a common cause of acute liver failure in the US.

    “APAP overdose is a common cause of acute liver failure in the US [71,72].”

    From A liver-on-a-chip platform with bioprinted hepatic spheroids (2016) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Abstract Results report that acetaminophen-containing pain relievers were commonly used without a prescription in the surveyed group, but do not discuss overdose or liver failure. Searches of the full-text copy for acetaminophen overdose and liver failure found no passage addressing whether overdose is a common cause of acute liver failure in the US. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blazer, D. G., & Wu, L.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06-30
Volume
57
Issue
7
Pages
1252-1257
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1539210069
Cited by
88
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HSN271200522071C)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA019623, R01DA019623, DA019901, R01DA019901)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
prescription pain relievers, propoxyphene, drug abuse, medication dependence, middle-aged adults, older adults, cannabis use, American Indian and Alaska Native populations, major depressive disorder, self-rated health, National Survey on Drug Use and Health
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analgesics, Cross-Sectional Studies, Nonprescription Drugs, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, United States, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review