Cited by 241Vitamin D Research StudiesBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionBone health and osteoporosis research

Vitamin D treatment for the prevention of falls in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Kalyani, Rita Rastogi, Stein, Brady, Valiyil, Ritu, Manno, Rebecca, Maynard, Janet W., Crews, Deidra C.·2010·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the effect of vitamin D therapy on fall prevention in older adults. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. SETTING: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, bibliographies of selected articles, and previous systematic reviews through February 2009 were searched for eligible studies. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (aged ≥60) who participated in randomized controlled trials that both investigated the effectiveness of vitamin D therapy in the prevention of falls and used an explicit fall definition. MEASUREMENTS: Two authors independently extracted data, including study characteristics, quality assessment, and outcomes. The I 2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity in a random‐effects model. RESULTS: Of 1,679 potentially relevant articles, 10 met inclusion criteria. In pooled analysis, vitamin D therapy (200–1,000 IU) resulted in 14% (relative risk (RR)=0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.79–0.93; I 2 =7%) fewer falls than calcium or placebo (number needed to treat =15). The following subgroups had significantly fewer falls: community‐dwelling (aged <80), adjunctive calcium supplementation, no history of fractures or falls, duration longer than 6 months, cholecalciferol, and dose of 800 IU or greater. Meta‐regression demonstrated no linear association between vitamin D dose or duration and treatment effect. Post hoc analysis including seven additional studies (17 total) without explicit fall definitions yielded smaller benefit (RR=0.92, 95% CI=0.87–0.98) and more heterogeneity ( I 2 =36%) but found significant intergroup differences favoring adjunctive calcium over none ( P =.001). CONCLUSION: Vitamin D treatment effectively reduces the risk of falls in older adults. Future studies should investigate whether particular populations or treatment regimens may have greater benefit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02949.x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vitamin D supplementation might reduce falls and improve muscle strength, but the evidence is inconclusive.

    “Vitamin D supplementation might also have wide-ranging beneficial effects in reducing falls and improving muscle strength, but evidence is inconclusive; large randomised controlled trials are addressing this hypothesis.102”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalyani, R. R., Stein, B., Valiyil, R., Manno, R., Maynard, J. W., & Crews, D. C.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07
Volume
58
Issue
7
Pages
1299-1310
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1907865805
Cited by
241
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 30
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (4k12hl087169-10)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (T32 90033122)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K12-HL087169)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK079637)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (T32AR048522)
  • National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR025006)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
vitamin D supplementation, fall prevention, older adults, calcium supplementation, vitamin D3, fall risk, community-dwelling older adults, fracture history
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Vitamin D, Vitamins, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review