Cited by 127Cognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive Abilities and TestingDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Improvement in memory with plasticity-based adaptive cognitive training: results of the 3-month follow-up

Zelinski, Elizabeth M., Spina, Laila M., Yaffe, Kristine, Ruff, Ronald, Kennison, Robert F., Mahncke, Henry W., Smith, Glenn E.·2011·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate maintenance of training effects of a novel brain plasticity–based computerized cognitive training program in older adults after a 3‐month no‐contact period. DESIGN: Multisite, randomized, controlled, double‐blind trial with two treatment groups. SETTING: Communities in northern and southern California and Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred eighty‐seven community‐dwelling adults aged 65 and older without diagnosis of clinically significant cognitive impairment. INTERVENTION: Random assignment into a broadly available brain plasticity–based computerized cognitive training program experimental group or a novelty‐ and intensity‐matched cognitive stimulation active control. Assessments at baseline, after training, and at 3 months. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a composite of auditory subtests of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Secondary measures included trained task performance, standardized neuropsychological assessments of overall memory and attention, and participant‐reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS: A significant difference in improvement from baseline to 3‐month follow‐up was seen between the experimental training and control groups on the secondary composite of overall memory and attention, ( P =.01, d =0.25), the trained processing‐speed measure ( P <.001, d =0.80), word list total recall ( P =.004, d =0.28), letter–number sequencing ( P =.003, d =0.29), and the cognitive subscale of PRO ( P =.006, d =0.27). Previously significant improvements became nonsignificant at the 3‐month follow‐up for the primary outcome, two secondary measures of attention and memory, and several PROs. Narrative memory continued to show no advantage for the experimental group. Effect sizes from baseline to follow‐up were generally smaller than effect sizes from baseline to posttraining. CONCLUSION: Training effects were maintained but waned over the 3‐month no‐contact period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03277.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zelinski, E. M., Spina, L. M., Yaffe, K., Ruff, R., Kennison, R. F., Mahncke, H. W., & Smith, G. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Queen's Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • California State University Los Angeles (US)
  • Posit Science (United States) (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
258-265
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1532921575
Cited by
127
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Mayo Clinic
  • University of Southern California
  • Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG010569)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
computerized cognitive training, neuroplasticity, older adults, memory, attention, cognitive stimulation, processing speed, narrative memory, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Attention, Cognition Disorders, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Memory, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review