Cited by 300Cancer-related cognitive impairment studiesCancer survivorship and careCognitive Functions and Memory

Cognitive Training for Improving Executive Function in Chemotherapy-Treated Breast Cancer Survivors

Open access
Kesler, Shelli, Hadi Hosseini, S.M., Heckler, Charles, Janelsins, Michelle, Palesh, Oxana, Mustian, Karen, Morrow, Gary·2013·Clinical Breast Cancer

Abstract

Background A majority of breast cancer (BC) survivors, particularly those treated with chemotherapy, experience long-term cognitive deficits that significantly reduce quality of life. Among the cognitive domains most commonly affected include executive functions (EF), such as working memory, cognitive flexibility, multitasking, planning, and attention. Previous studies in other populations have shown that cognitive training, a behavioral method for treating cognitive deficits, can result in significant improvements in a number of cognitive skills, including EF.Materials and methods In this study, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to investigate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a novel, online EF training program in long-term BC survivors. A total of 41 BC survivors (21 active, 20 wait list) completed the 48 session training program over 12 weeks. The participants were, on average, 6 years after therapy.Results Cognitive training led to significant improvements in cognitive flexibility, verbal fluency and processing speed, with marginally significant downstream improvements in verbal memory as assessed via standardized measures. Self-ratings of EF skills, including planning, organizing, and task monitoring, also were improved in the active group compared with the wait list group.Conclusions Our findings suggest that EF skills may be improved even in long-term survivors by using a computerized, home-based intervention program. These improvements may potentially include subjective EF skills, which suggest a transfer of the training program to real-world behaviors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.02.004

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kesler, S., Hadi Hosseini, S. M., Heckler, C., Janelsins, M., Palesh, O., Mustian, K., & Morrow, G.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Kesler, Shelli
Venue
Clinical Breast Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
299-306
ISSN
1526-8209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988359564
Cited by
300
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2012: 1
FWCI
19.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Breast Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Institutes of Health (1dp2od004445-01)
  • National Cancer Institute (K07CA168886)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
cognitive training, executive function, breast cancer survivors, chemotherapy, cognitive impairment, cognitive flexibility, verbal fluency, processing speed, verbal memory, online intervention, home-based intervention, feasibility, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Cognition Disorders, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Promotion, Humans, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Survivors, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review