The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gait and Cognition: A Complementary Approach to Understanding Brain Function and the Risk of Falling
Open accessAbstract
Until recently, clinicians and researchers have performed gait assessments and cognitive assessments separately when evaluating older adults, but increasing evidence from clinical practice, epidemiological studies, and clinical trials shows that gait and cognition are interrelated in older adults. Quantifiable alterations in gait in older adults are associated with falls, dementia, and disability. At the same time, emerging evidence indicates that early disturbances in cognitive processes such as attention, executive function, and working memory are associated with slower gait and gait instability during single‐ and dual‐task testing and that these cognitive disturbances assist in the prediction of future mobility loss, falls, and progression to dementia. This article reviews the importance of the interrelationship between gait and cognition in aging and presents evidence that gait assessments can provide a window into the understanding of cognitive function and dysfunction and fall risk in older people in clinical practice. To this end, the benefits of dual‐task gait assessments (e.g., walking while performing an attention‐demanding task) as a marker of fall risk are summarized. A potential complementary approach for reducing the risk of falls by improving certain aspects of cognition through nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments is also presented. Untangling the relationship between early gait disturbances and early cognitive changes may be helpful in identifying older adults at risk of experiencing mobility decline, falls, and progression to dementia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gait speed and survival in older adults.
Studenski, S. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1923 · Cited by 4,558
Cited by
The Diagnosis and Management of Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Clinical Review
Langa, K. M., & Levine, D. A. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.13806 · Cited by 1,337
Cognitive contributions to gait and falls: evidence and implications
Amboni, M., Barone, P., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2013) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.25674 · Cited by 565
Self-citationRelationships between gait and emotion in Parkinson’s disease: A narrative review
Avanzino, L., Lagravinese, G., Abbruzzese, G., & Pelosin, E. (2018) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.171 · Cited by 91
Calina, D., Buga, A. M., Mitroi, M., Buha, A., Caruntu, C., Scheau, C., Bouyahya, A., El Omari, N., El Menyiy, N., & Docea, A. O. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9082395 · Cited by 65
Mirrored Current-Conveyor Transimpedance Amplifier for Home Monitoring LiDAR Sensors
Yoon, D., Joo, J.-E., & Park, S. M. (2021) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2020.3043797 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Montero‐Odasso, M., Verghese, J., Beauchet, O., & Hausdorff, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10-30
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2127-2136
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2032254925
- Cited by
- 1,052
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 110.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gait and Cognition: A Complementary Approach to Understanding Brain Function and the Risk of Falling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04209.x
- The paper
- Montero‐Odasso, M., Verghese, J., Beauchet, O., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2012). Gait and Cognition: A Complementary Approach to Understanding Brain Function and the Risk of Falling. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04209.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.