Cited by 85Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentCognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Heart Rate-Defined Phases of Attention, Look Duration, and Infant Performance in the Paired-Comparison Paradigm

Colombo, John, Richman, W Allen, Shaddy, D Jill, Follmer Greenhoot, Andrea, Maikranz, Julie M·2001·Child Development

Abstract

Four-month-old infants (N= 68) were tested in a paired-comparison familiarization – novelty recognition task in which the length of choice trials was systematically manipulated. Peak look duration during pretest and familiarization periods significantly predicted a dichotomous measure of recognition performance, but recognition was unaffected by choice-trial length. Heart rate (HR) was simultaneously assessed during the task, and the amount of time infants spent in various HR-defined phases of attention was assessed. Longer durations of looking during pretest and familiarization were significantly associated with more time spent in both sustained attention (SA) and attention termination (AT). Of these two variables, only individual differences in AT accounted for significant variance in recognition memory performance. A final analysis addressed the possibility that individual differences in AT mediated the relation between look duration and recognition performance. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that individual differences in the disengagement of attention underlie the relation between look duration and cognitive performance in early to midinfancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8624.00368

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colombo, J., Richman, W. A., Shaddy, D. J., Follmer Greenhoot, A., & Maikranz, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • University of Kansas , Lawrence, KS
Venue
Child Development
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
72
Issue
6
Pages
1605-1616
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2137718262
Cited by
85
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD35903, R01HD035903)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
infant attention, heart rate, recognition memory, sustained attention, attentional disengagement, individual differences, early infancy
MeSH terms
Attention, Fixation, Ocular, Heart Rate, Humans, Infant, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review