The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives: components of the surgical toolbox
Abstract
The surgical toolbox is expanding, and newer products are being developed to improve results. Reducing blood loss so that bloodless surgery can be performed may help minimize morbidity and length of stay. As patients, hospital administrators, and government regulators desire less invasive procedures, the surgical technical challenge is increasing. More operations are being performed through minimally invasive incisions with laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic approaches. In this setting, tools that can reduce bleeding by causing blood to clot, sealing vessels, or gluing tissues are gaining an increasing importance. Thus, hemostats, sealants, and adhesives are becoming a more important element of surgical practice. This review is designed to facilitate the reader's basic knowledge of these tools so that informed choices are made for controlling bleeding in specific clinical situations. Such information is useful for all members of the operative team. The team includes surgeons, anesthesiologists, residents, and nurses as well as hematologists and other medical specialists who may be involved in the perioperative care of surgical patients. An understanding of these therapeutic options may also be helpful to the transfusion service. In some cases, these materials may be stored in the blood bank, and their appropriate use may reduce demand for other transfusion components. The product classification used in this review includes hemostats as represented by product categories that include mechanical agents, active agents, flowables, and fibrin sealants; sealants as represented by fibrin sealants and polyethylene glycol hydrogels; and adhesives as represented by cyanoacrylates and albumin cross‐linked with glutaraldehyde. Only those agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and presently available (February 2008) for sale in the United States are discussed in this review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Murphy, G. J., Reeves, B. C., Rogers, C. A., Rizvi, S. I. A., Culliford, L., & Angelini, G. D. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.698977 · Cited by 1,371 · cited 1×
“Thus, reducing the need for transfusions not only may reduce costs, but also may improve results.(4,5) In this setting, devices that may decrease bleeding, reduce operative time, and improve the quality of surgical tissue”
Background
Cited by
Nam, S., & Mooney, D. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00798 · Cited by 764
Polymeric hydrogel systems as emerging biomaterial platforms to enable hemostasis and wound healing
Pourshahrestani, S., Zeimaran, E., Kadri, N. A., Mutlu, N., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2020) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202000905 · Cited by 448
The chemistry of tissue adhesive materials
Bouten, P. J. M., Zonjee, M., Bender, J., Yauw, S. T. K., van Goor, H., van Hest, J. C. M., & Hoogenboom, R. (2014) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.001 · Cited by 448
Mehdizadeh, M., Weng, H., Gyawali, D., Tang, L., & Yang, J. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.055 · Cited by 422
Shear-Thinning Nanocomposite Hydrogels for the Treatment of Hemorrhage
Gaharwar, A. K., Avery, R. K., Assmann, A., Paul, A., McKinley, G. H., Khademhosseini, A., & Olsen, B. D. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn503719n · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Spotnitz, W. D., & Burks, S.
- Venue
- Transfusion
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1502-1516
- ISSN
- 0041-1132 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2995
- OpenAlex
- W2014882340
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives: components of the surgical toolbox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01703.x
- The paper
- Spotnitz, W. D., & Burks, S. (2008). Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives: components of the surgical toolbox. Transfusion. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01703.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.