The American Red Cross donor hemovigilance program: complications of blood donation reported in 2006
Abstract
Background The American Red Cross (ARC) initiated a comprehensive donor hemovigilance program in 2003. We provide an overview of reported complications after whole blood (WB), apheresis platelet (PLT), or automated red cell (R2) donation and analyze factors contributing to the variability in reported complication rates in our national program. Study design and methods Complications recorded at the collection site or reported after allogeneic WB, apheresis PLT, and R2 donation procedures in 36 regional blood centers in 2006 were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results Complications after 6,014,472 WB, 449,594 PLT, and 228,183 R2 procedures totaled 209,815, 25,966, and 12,282 (348.9, 577.5, and 538.3 per 10,000 donations), respectively, the vast majority of which were minor presyncopal reactions and small hematomas. Regional center, donor age, sex, and donation status were independently associated with complication rates after WB, PLT, and R2 donation. Seasonal variability in complications rates after WB and R2 donation correlated with the proportion of donors under 20 years old. Excluding large hematomas, the overall rate of major complications was 7.4, 5.2, and 3.3 per 10,000 collections for WB, PLT, and R2 procedures, respectively. Outside medical care was recorded at similar rates for both WB and automated collections (3.2 vs. 2.9 per 10,000 donations, respectively). Conclusion The ARC data describe the current risks of blood donation in a model…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies have reported higher prevalence of vasovagal reactions among female donors in various donation setups.
“Many studies have reported higher prevalence of vasovagal reactions among the female donors in various donation setup (4,9,16,17,22,23, 24, 25, 26).”
From ADVERSE EVENTS IN BLOOD DONORS: SPECTRUM AND REMEDY (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
Cites
Trouern‐Trend, J. J., Cable, R. G., Badon, S. J., Newman, B. H., & Popovsky, M. A. (1999) · Transfusion · doi:10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39399219291.x · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citationA Study of Criteria for Blood Donor Deferral
Tomasulo, P. A., Anderson, A. J., Paluso, M. B., Gutschenritter, M. A., & Aster, R. H. (1980) · Transfusion · doi:10.1046/j.1537-2995.1980.20581034503.x · Cited by 104 · see citing works
The safety profile of automated collections: an analysis of more than 1 million collections
Wiltbank, T. B., & Giordano, G. F. (2007) · Transfusion · doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01224.x · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marwaha, N., Agnihotri, N., & Sharma, R. (2012) · Asian Journal of Transfusion Science · doi:10.4103/0973-6247.98922 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Frequency and risk factors for donor reactions in an anonymous blood donor survey
Goldman, M., Osmond, L., Yi, Q., Cameron‐Choi, K., & O'Brien, S. F. (2013) · Transfusion · doi:10.1111/trf.12011 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Seheult, J. N., Lund, M. E., Yazer, M. H., & Titlestad, K. (2016) · Blood Research · doi:10.5045/br.2016.51.4.293 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Donor hemovigilance: a call to arms
Storch, E. K. (2020) · Transfusion · doi:10.1111/trf.15854 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF ADVERSE EVENTS IN BLOOD DONORS FROM NAVI MUMBAI.
Gupta, S., Madan, A., Dhar, R., & D.B., B. (2013) · Journal of Evolution of medical and Dental Sciences · doi:10.14260/jemds/427 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Biswas, D., Mukherjee, K., Chakrabarty, D., Bhattacharya, P., & Mukherjee, S. (2020) · ISBT Science Series · doi:10.1111/voxs.12548 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Mangwana, S. (2013) · Journal of Pathology of Nepal · doi:10.3126/jpn.v3i6.8993 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Chowdhury, F., Siddiqui, M., Rahman, K., Begum, H., Begum, H., Hoque, M., & Nasreen, Z. (2013) · Bangladesh Journal of Medicine · doi:10.3329/bjmed.v22i2.13589 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
ADVERSE EVENTS IN BLOOD DONORS: SPECTRUM AND REMEDY
Bhushan, R., Gupta, P., Mehra, A., & Iyengar, S. (2023) · PARIPEX-Indian Journal of Research · doi:10.36106/paripex/1800303
Patel, P., Rajendran, V., Nair, A. R., & Gupta, D. (2026) · Asian Journal of Transfusion Science · doi:10.4103/ajts.ajts_154_24
“[4,7] The Donor vigilance is still in the development phase in India; consistent reporting and the minimum inter-and intra-observer variation will help in improving the donor care and safety.”
Influential
- Authors
- Eder, A. F., Dy, B. A., Kennedy, J. M., Notari IV, E. P., Strupp, A., Wissel, M. E., Reddy, R., Gibble, J., Haimowitz, M. D., Newman, B. H., Chambers, L. A., Hillyer, C. D., & Benjamin, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Grant Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eder, Anne F.
- Venue
- Transfusion
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1809-1819
- ISSN
- 0041-1132 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2995
- OpenAlex
- W1996381449
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 26.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transfusion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
- Keywords
- whole blood donation, apheresis platelet donation, hematoma, seasonal variation, young donors, blood centers, American Red Cross
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Component Removal, Blood Donors, Female, Hematoma, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Plateletpheresis, Red Cross, Sex Factors, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review