Cited by 149Blood donation and transfusion practicesBlood transfusion and managementNonprofit Sector and Volunteering

The American Red Cross donor hemovigilance program: complications of blood donation reported in 2006

Eder, Anne F., Dy, Beth A., Kennedy, Jean M., Notari IV, Edward P., Strupp, Annie, Wissel, Mary Ellen, Reddy, Ramakrishna, Gibble, Joan +5 more·2008·Transfusion

Abstract

Background The American Red Cross (ARC) initiated a comprehensive donor hemovigilance program in 2003. We provide an overview of reported complications after whole blood (WB), apheresis platelet (PLT), or automated red cell (R2) donation and analyze factors contributing to the variability in reported complication rates in our national program. Study design and methods Complications recorded at the collection site or reported after allogeneic WB, apheresis PLT, and R2 donation procedures in 36 regional blood centers in 2006 were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results Complications after 6,014,472 WB, 449,594 PLT, and 228,183 R2 procedures totaled 209,815, 25,966, and 12,282 (348.9, 577.5, and 538.3 per 10,000 donations), respectively, the vast majority of which were minor presyncopal reactions and small hematomas. Regional center, donor age, sex, and donation status were independently associated with complication rates after WB, PLT, and R2 donation. Seasonal variability in complications rates after WB and R2 donation correlated with the proportion of donors under 20 years old. Excluding large hematomas, the overall rate of major complications was 7.4, 5.2, and 3.3 per 10,000 collections for WB, PLT, and R2 procedures, respectively. Outside medical care was recorded at similar rates for both WB and automated collections (3.2 vs. 2.9 per 10,000 donations, respectively). Conclusion The ARC data describe the current risks of blood donation in a model…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01811.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many studies have reported higher prevalence of vasovagal reactions among female donors in various donation setups.

    “Many studies have reported higher prevalence of vasovagal reactions among the female donors in various donation setup (4,9,16,17,22,23, 24, 25, 26).”

    From ADVERSE EVENTS IN BLOOD DONORS: SPECTRUM AND REMEDY (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eder, A. F., Dy, B. A., Kennedy, J. M., Notari IV, E. P., Strupp, A., Wissel, M. E., Reddy, R., Gibble, J., Haimowitz, M. D., Newman, B. H., Chambers, L. A., Hillyer, C. D., & Benjamin, R. J.
Affiliations
Grant Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Eder, Anne F.
Venue
Transfusion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09
Volume
48
Issue
9
Pages
1809-1819
ISSN
  • 0041-1132 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2995
OpenAlex
W1996381449
Cited by
149
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
26.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transfusion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Keywords
whole blood donation, apheresis platelet donation, hematoma, seasonal variation, young donors, blood centers, American Red Cross
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Component Removal, Blood Donors, Female, Hematoma, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Plateletpheresis, Red Cross, Sex Factors, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review