Incidence of Vasovagal Reaction among the Blood Donors Attending at Transfusion Medicine Department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Without blood there may be no blood transfusion. Without donors there may not any blood. During vasovagal reaction there is chance of accidental fall and injury to blood donor. So improving the safety of the blood donation experience will reduce the donor injuries and increase the blood donation, donation frequency and donor satisfaction. Objective: This study was done to find out the incidence of blood donor reaction- vasovagal reactions among the blood donors attending at transfusion medicine department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital and to improve the donors safety. Methodology: This study was done at Transfusion Medicine Department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital in the period between January 2010 to December 2010. Total 21815 donors of 18 to 55 years of both sexes were selected after reviewing the questionnaire, physical and medical examination and written consent. Donors were observed for 30 minutes after donation. The needle site was covered with a bandage and the donor was directed to keep the bandage on for several hours. Result: In this study, out of 21815 donors 163(8.7%) developed reaction. In163 reactions, 72(44.18%) were in male and 91 (55.82%) were in female donors. Within 20179 male donors, adverse reactions occurred in 72 (0.35%) and within 1636 female donors, adverse reactions occurred in 91 (5.56%) The symptoms were agitation 23 (14.12%), pallor 31 (19.02%), sweating 29 (17.79%), nausea 21 (12.88%), vomiting 38 (23.21%), cold feeling 12(7.36%), loss of consciousness 9(5.52%),i.e. severe reactions were 9(5.53%) and mild to moderate reactions were154 (94.47%). Among the reactions 127 (0.89%) occurred in new donors, 32 (0.49%) occurred in occasional donors and 4 (0.37%) in periodic donors. Conclusion: Vasovagal reactions are more common in female and new donors. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjmed.v22i2.13589 Bangladesh J Medicine 2011; 22: 47-50
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies have reported higher prevalence of vasovagal reactions among female donors in various donation setups.
“Many studies have reported higher prevalence of vasovagal reactions among the female donors in various donation setup (4,9,16,17,22,23, 24, 25, 26).”
From ADVERSE EVENTS IN BLOOD DONORS: SPECTRUM AND REMEDY (2023) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
Adverse Reactions to Allogeneic Whole Blood Donation by 16- and 17-Year-Olds
Eder, A. F. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.19.2279 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Wiltbank, T. B., Giordano, G. F., Kamel, H., Tomasulo, P., & Custer, B. (2008) · Transfusion · doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01745.x · Cited by 149 · see citing works
The American Red Cross donor hemovigilance program: complications of blood donation reported in 2006
Eder, A. F., Dy, B. A., Kennedy, J. M., Notari IV, E. P., Strupp, A., Wissel, M. E., Reddy, R., Gibble, J., Haimowitz, M. D., Newman, B. H., et al. (2008) · Transfusion · doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01811.x · Cited by 149 · see citing works
BLOOD DONORS AND BLOOD COLLECTION: Delayed adverse reactions to blood donation
Kamel, H. T., Tomasulo, P., Bravo, M. D., Wiltbank, T. B., Cusick, R., James, R. C., & Custer, B. (2009) · Transfusion · doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02397.x · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Eder, A. F., Goldman, M., Rossmann, S. N., Waxman, D. A., & Bianco, C. (2009) · Transfusion Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.tmrv.2009.03.003 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Donor reactions in high‐school donors: the effects of sex, weight, and collection volume
Newman, B. H., Satz, S. L., Janowicz, N., & Siegfried, B. A. (2005) · Transfusion · doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00713.x · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ADVERSE EVENTS IN BLOOD DONORS: SPECTRUM AND REMEDY
Bhushan, R., Gupta, P., Mehra, A., & Iyengar, S. (2023) · PARIPEX-Indian Journal of Research · doi:10.36106/paripex/1800303
Modified versus Classical Tubularised Incised Plate Urethroplasty in Hypospadias
Abdullateef, K. S. A., Elbarbary, M. M., Kaddah, S., Elezaby, B. M., Ragab, A. S., & Mohamed, W. (2023) · African Journal of Paediatric Surgery · doi:10.4103/ajps.ajps_107_22
- Authors
- Chowdhury, F., Siddiqui, M., Rahman, K., Begum, H., Begum, H., Hoque, M., & Nasreen, Z.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Traumatology & Orthopaedic Rehabilitation (BD)
- Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
- Venue
- Bangladesh Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-02-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 47-50
- ISSN
- 1023-1986 (ISSN-L)
- 2408-8366
- OpenAlex
- W2026863416
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bangladesh Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Keywords
- vasovagal reaction, blood donors, incidence, donor safety, blood donation, adverse effects, loss of consciousness, transfusion medicine, Dhaka Medical College Hospital
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review