The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding Uncertainty
Abstract
There is more information we don't know than we do know for making most critical decisions involving risks. Our focus must be on understanding and effectively dealing with what we don't know. As a first step in achieving this focus, a classification of the types of uncertainties that must be addressed and the sources of these types of uncertainties is presented. The purpose is to provide a framework for discussion about addressing uncertainty, particularly in risk analyses. Both uncertainty and variability of information are addressed using four main classes: Metrical uncertainty and variability in measurement, Structural uncertainty due to complexity, including models and their validation, Temporal uncertainty in future and past states Translational uncertainty in explaining uncertain results. The factors that contribute uncertainty and error to these classes are identified, and their interrelationships indicated. Both subjective and objective aspects are addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support
Walker, W. E., Harremoës, P., Rotmans, J., van der Sluijs, J. P., van Asselt, M. B. A., Janssen, P., & Krayer von Krauss, M. P. (2003) · Integrated Assessment · doi:10.1076/iaij.4.1.5.16466 · Cited by 2,067
Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability
Ferson, S., & Ginzburg, L. R. (1996) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(96)00071-3 · Cited by 621
Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment Modelling
van Asselt, M. B. A., & Rotmans, J. (2002) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/a:1015783803445 · Cited by 379
Rabinovich, A., & Morton, T. A. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01771.x · Cited by 114
Perceptions About Generative AI and ChatGPT Use by Faculty and College Students
Petricini, T., Wu, C., & Zipf, S. T. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/jyma4 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Rowe, W. D.
- Venue
- Risk Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 743-750
- ISSN
- 0272-4332 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-6924
- OpenAlex
- W4236874811
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Uncertainty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00284.x
- The paper
- Rowe, W. D. (1994). Understanding Uncertainty. Risk Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00284.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.