Cited by 426Environmental and Social Impact AssessmentsProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignRisk and Safety Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Uncertainty in Model‐Based Environmental Assessment: The NUSAP System

Open access

Van Der Sluijs, Jeroen P., Craye, Matthieu, Funtowicz, Silvio, Kloprogge, Penny, Ravetz, Jerry, Risbey, James·2005·Risk Analysis

DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00604.x

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article discusses recent experiences with the Numeral Unit Spread Assessment Pedigree (NUSAP) system for multidimensional uncertainty assessment, based on four case studies that vary in complexity. We show that the NUSAP method is applicable not only to relatively simple calculation schemes but also to complex models in a meaningful way and that NUSAP is useful to assess not only parameter uncertainty but also (model) assumptions. A diagnostic diagram can be used to synthesize results of quantitative analysis of parameter sensitivity and qualitative review (pedigree analysis) of parameter strength. It provides an analytic tool to prioritize uncertainties according to quantitative and qualitative insights in the limitations of available knowledge. We show that extension of the pedigree scheme to include societal dimensions of uncertainty, such as problem framing and value‐laden assumptions, further promotes reflexivity and collective learning. When used in a deliberative setting, NUSAP pedigree assessment has the potential to foster a deeper social debate and a negotiated management of complex environmental problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00604.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The Uses of Argument
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments
Morris, M. D. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804 · Cited by 4,943
Science for the post-normal age
Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993) · Futures · doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-l · Cited by 4,639
Self-citation
Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences
Орескес, Н., Shrader‐Frechette, K., & Belitz, K. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.263.5147.641 · Cited by 3,026
Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments
Morris, M. D. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269043 · Cited by 2,648
Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models
McCulloch, A. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2005.358_16.x · Cited by 1,866
Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., & Ratto, M. (2004) · Cited by 1,797
Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1990) · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0621-1 · Cited by 1,575
Self-citation
Sensitivity Analysis in Practice
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., & Ratto, M. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470870958 · Cited by 526
On the Relative Importance of Input Factors in Mathematical Models
Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2002) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214502388618447 · Cited by 448

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

Craye M., 2001, Milieu en gezondheid in Vlaanderen: naar en adequate dialoog tussen overheid, bevolking en wetenschap
Van der Sluijs J. P., 1997, Anchoring amid uncertainty; On the management of uncertainties in risk assessment of anthropogenic climate change
Van der Sluijs J. P. Risbey J. S. &Ravetz J. R.(in press).Uncertainty assessment of VOC emissions from paint in the Netherlands.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.
EEA, 2003, EMEP/CORINAIR Emission Inventory Guidebook
Kloprogge P., 2005, A Method for the Analysis of Assumptions in Assessments Applied to Two Indicators in the Fifth Dutch Environmental Outlook
Aelvoet W., 1998, Risico op gezondheidsschade bij kinderen van de Neerlandwijk te Wilrijk
Schoeters G., 1998, Studie van gezondheidsaspecten en gezondheidsrisico's ten gevolge van milieuverontreiniging in de Neerlandwijk te Wilrijk
Koppen G., 2001, Biomonitoringsonderzoek 50‐65j vrouwen en 21‐40j mannen: evaluatie van de relatie milieu‐gezondheid op basis van meting van biomerkers
Staessen J., 2001, Koepeltekst biomonitoring bij adolescenten: een gevoelige nieuwe methode voor het inschatten van verontreiniging van het leefmilieu en geassocieerde gezondheidsrisico's
Van de Graaf H., 2000, Beleid en Politiek
Von Schomberg R., 1997, Argumentatie in de context van een wetenschappelijke controverse

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 426

A new framework for multi-hazards risk aggregation
Bani-Mustafa, T., Zeng, Z., Zio, E., & Vasseur, D. (2019) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.043 · Cited by 18
Brief Communication: The dark side of risk and crisis communication: legal conflicts and responsibility allocation
Scolobig, A. (2015) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-15-1449-2015 · Cited by 17
Forecasting technology and part obsolescence
Sandborn, P. A. (2015) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture · doi:10.1177/0954405415598923 · Cited by 17
Service Uncertainty and Cost for Product Service Systems
Erkoyuncu, J. A., Roy, R., Datta, P. P., Wardle, P., & Murphy, F. (2011) · Decision engineering · doi:10.1007/978-0-85729-189-9_7 · Cited by 17
Integrated Modeling of Global Environmental Change (IMAGE)
Kram, T., & Stehfest, E. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-619-0.ch005 · Cited by 17
Nutrition and public health economic evaluations under the lenses of post normal science
Piano, S. L., & Robinson, M. (2019) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.06.008 · Cited by 17
Uncertainty in biodiversity science, policy and management: a conceptual overview
Haila, Y., & Henle, K. (2014) · Nature Conservation · doi:10.3897/natureconservation.8.5941 · Cited by 17
A framework for guiding safe and sustainable‐by‐design innovation
Blanco, C. F., Behrens, P., Vijver, M. G., Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M., Quik, J. T. K., & Cucurachi, S. (2024) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13609 · Cited by 16
Indicators for Science, Technology and Innovation on the Crossroad to Foresight
Гохберг, Л. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31827-6_15 · Cited by 15
Communicating uncertainty in quota advice: a case for confidence interval harvest control rules (CI-HCRs) for fisheries
Dankel, D. J., Vølstad, J. H., & Aanes, S. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2015-0078 · Cited by 15
Assessing the social and economic impact of small scale fisheries management measures in a marine protected area with limited data
Goti, L. (2017) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.039 · Cited by 15
Preserving Urmia Lake in a changing world : reconciling anthropogenic and climate drivers by hydrological modelling and policy assessment
Shadkam, S. (2017) · doi:10.18174/413386 · Cited by 15
Use of territorial LCA framework for local food systems assessment: Methodological developments and application
Lulovicova, A., & Bouissou, S. (2024) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-024-02289-8 · Cited by 14
A framework to assess quality and uncertainty in disaster loss data
Romão, X., & Paupério, E. (2016) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2364-3 · Cited by 14
Qualichem In Vivo: A Tool for Assessing the Quality of In Vivo Studies and Its Application for Bisphenol A
Maxim, L., & van der Sluijs, J. P. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087738 · Cited by 14
Are We Objective? A Study into the Effectiveness of Risk Measurement in the Water Industry
Kosovac, A., Davidson, B., & Malano, H. M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11051279 · Cited by 14
Relational quality and uncertainty in common pool water management: an exploratory lab experiment
Brugnach, M., de Waard, S., Dubois, D., & Farolfi, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94517-6 · Cited by 16
A risk science perspective on liability/guilt and uncertainty judgements in courts
Aven, T., & Flage, R. (2022) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.14037 · Cited by 13
Unpacking the modeling process for energy policy making
Piano, S. L., Lőrincz, M. J., Puy, A., Pye, S., Saltelli, A., Smith, S. T., & van der Sluijs, J. P. (2023) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.14248 · Cited by 16
Social sensitivity analysis in conflictive environmental governance: A case of forest planning
Quintana, S. C., & González, M. M. A. (2017) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2017.04.003 · Cited by 13
Impact assessment culture in the European Union. Time for something new?
Saltelli, A., Kuc-Czarnecka, M. E., Piano, S. L., Lőrincz, M. J., Olczyk, M., Puy, A., Reinert, E. S., Smith, S. T., & van der Sluijs, J. P. (2023) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.005 · Cited by 13
The latest iteration of IPCC uncertainty guidance—an author perspective
Jones, R. N. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0239-x · Cited by 13
Critical appraisal of assumptions in chains of model calculations used to project local climate impacts for adaptation decision support—the case of Baakse Beek
van der Sluijs, J. P., & Wardekker, J. A. (2015) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/045005 · Cited by 14
Response to Comment by Walker et al. on “From Data to Decisions: Processing Information, Biases, and Beliefs for Improved Management of Natural Resources and Environments”
Glynn, P. D., Voinov, A. A., Shapiro, C. D., & White, P. (2018) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1002/2018ef000819 · Cited by 13
Trends and challenges in risk assessment of environmental contaminants
Ragas, A. M. J. (2011) · Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1080/1943815x.2011.597769 · Cited by 14
Treating Nanoparticles with Precaution: Recognising Qualitative Uncertainty in Scientific Risk Assessment
Wickson, F., Gillund, F. T., & Myhr, A. I. (2019) · doi:10.1201/9780429067150-31 · Cited by 13
A practical approach for evaluating the strength of knowledge supporting risk assessment models
Bani-Mustafa, T., Zeng, Z., Zio, E., & Vasseur, D. (2020) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104596 · Cited by 14
Open-source modelling infrastructure: Building decarbonization capacity in Canada
McPherson, M., Monroe, J. G., Jurasz, J., Rowe, A. M., Hendriks, R., Stanislaw, L., Awais, M., Seatle, M., Xu, R., Crownshaw, T., et al. (2022) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2022.100961 · Cited by 12
Development tendencies and turning points of futures studies
Kristóf, T. (2024) · European Journal of Futures Research · doi:10.1186/s40309-024-00231-7 · Cited by 12
Using decision support tools in multistakeholder environmental planning: restorative justice and subbasin planning in the Columbia River Basin
Hill, G. M., Kolmes, S. A., Humphreys, M. L., McLain, R. J., & Jones, E. T. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-019-00548-x · Cited by 12
Pragmatic Validation of Numerical Models Used for the Assessment of Radioactive Waste Repositories: A Perspective
Finsterle, S. A., & Lanyon, B. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15103585 · Cited by 12
Avoiding post-truth environmental conflict in New Zealand: communicating uncertainties in endangered species science
Palliser, A., & Dodson, G. (2019) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.18040205 · Cited by 12
Shaping future perspectives in policy advice under deep, long-term uncertainty. The case of the Dutch Delta Committee
Klooster, S. A. V. T., & Veenman, S. A. (2021) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2021.102700 · Cited by 12
Performance Evaluation of Environmental Models
Bennett, N., Croke, B., Jakeman, A. J., Newham, L., & Norton, J. P. (2010) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 12
Climate change impact assessment and adaptation under uncertainty
Wardekker, A. (2011) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 12
The Fish We Feed Fish: An Evaluation Of Primary Production Requirements And Greenhouse Gas Emissions Of Reduction Fisheries In The Age Of Sustainable Boundaries
Cashion, T. (2015) · DalSpace (Dalhousie University) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.1157.8087 · Cited by 11
How Certain is Good Enough? Managing Data Quality and Uncertainty in Ordinal Citizen Science Data Sets for Evidence-Based Policies on Fresh Water
Stankiewicz, J., König, A., Pickar, K., & Weiss, S. (2023) · Citizen Science Theory and Practice · doi:10.5334/cstp.592 · Cited by 11
Assessing climate change adaptation strategies—the case of drought and heat wave in the French nuclear sector
Hanski, J., Rosqvist, T., & Crawford‐Brown, D. (2018) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1312-z · Cited by 11
A New Framework To Idenitfy And Assess Hidden Assumptions In The Background Knowledge Of A Risk Assessment
Langdalen, H., Abrahamsen, E. B., & Abrahamsen, H. B. (2020) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2020.106909 · Cited by 11
Inhalation risk assessment of exposure to the selected volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from the facilities of a steel plant
Chiang, H. L., Lin, W., Lai, J. S., & Wang, W. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A · doi:10.1080/10934529.2010.500932 · Cited by 11
Subjective elements in climate policy advice
Risbey, J. S. (2007) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-007-9314-8 · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Uncertainty in Environmental Water Quality Modelling: Where Do We Stand?
Jakeman, A. J., Croke, B., & Fu, B. (2018) · Green energy and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99867-1_96 · Cited by 11
Using Structured Decision-Making Tools With Marginalised Fishers to Promote System-Based Fisheries Management Approaches in South Africa
Gammage, L. C., & Jarre, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00477 · Cited by 11
Democratizing Accounting Technologies: the Potential of the Sustainability Assessment Model (SAM)
Brown, J. A., & Frame, B. (2005) · ResearchArchive–Te Puna Rangahau (Victoria University of Wellington) · Cited by 11
Making Progress in Integrated Modelling and Environmental Decision Support
Jakeman, A. J., Elsawah, S., Guillaume, J. H. A., & Pierce, S. A. (2011) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22285-6_2 · Cited by 11
Natural Hazard Modeling and Uncertainty Analysis
Thompson, M. P., & Warmink, J. J. (2016) · Geophysical monograph · doi:10.1002/9781119028116.ch2 · Cited by 11
Perspectives to Performance of Environment and Health Assessments and Models—From Outputs to Outcomes?
Pohjola, M., Pohjola, P., Tainio, M., & Tuomisto, J. T. (2013) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph10072621 · Cited by 10
Reflective approaches to uncertainty assessment and communication
van der Sluijs, J. P., Petersen, A. C., & Funtowicz, S. O. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511777141.014 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Enhancing a community-based water resource tool for assessing environmental change: the arctic water resources vulnerability index revisited
Kliskey, A. D., Williams, P., Abatzoglou, J. T., Alessa, L., & Lammers, R. B. (2018) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-018-9712-7 · Cited by 10
Post-Normal Science. The Escape of Science: From Truth to Quality?
Karpińska, A. (2018) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2018.1531157 · Cited by 11
In pursuit of information: evaluating strategic plans
Baskıcı, Ç., & Ercil, Y. (2019) · VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems · doi:10.1108/vjikms-03-2019-0037 · Cited by 10
A quality assessment framework for natural hazard event documentation: application to trans-basin flood reports in Germany
Uhlemann, S., Thieken, A. H., & Merz, B. (2014) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-14-189-2014 · Cited by 10
Growth, the Environment and Keynes: Reflections on Two Heterodox Schools of Thought
Spash, C. L., & Schandl, H. (2009) · Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) · Cited by 10
Regional application of the Pitman monthly rainfall-runoff model in Southern Africa incorporating uncertainty
Kapangaziwiri, E. (2011) · Cited by 9
Using expert elicitation to strengthen future regional climate information for climate services
Grainger, S., Dessai, S., Daron, J., Taylor, A. L., & Siu, Y. L. (2022) · Climate Services · doi:10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100278 · Cited by 9
Science – Post-normal perspectives
Ravetz, J. R. (2022) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2022.102958 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Évaluation de la qualité de la connaissance dans une perspective délibérative
van der Sluijs, J. P., Douguet, J.-M., O’Connor, & Ravetz, J. R. (2008) · VertigO · doi:10.4000/vertigo.5035 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Social involvement in environmental governance: The relevance of quality assurance processes in forest planning
Quintana, S. C., & Monagas, M. (2017) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.017 · Cited by 9
Converting Waste Toilet Paper into Electricity: A First‐Stage Technoeconomic Feasibility Study
van der Roest, E., van der Spek, M. W., Ramírez, A., van der Zwaan, B., & Rothenberg, G. (2017) · Energy Technology · doi:10.1002/ente.201700247 · Cited by 9
Enlisting Supervised Machine Learning in Mapping Scientific Uncertainty Expressed in Food Risk Analysis
Róna‐Tas, Á., Cornuéjols, A., Blanchemanche, S., Duroy, A., & Martin, C. (2017) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124117729701 · Cited by 9
A methodological framework for participatory processes in water resources management
Krywkow, J. (2009) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036528351 · Cited by 9
Commentary: New Currents in Science: The Challenge of Quality, examining the discrepancies and incongruities between Japanese techno-scientific policy and the citizens’ science movement in post-3/11 Japan
Tsukahara, T. (2017) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.04.008 · Cited by 9
Qualitative and quantitative uncertainties in regional rainfall frequency analysis
Zhu, Q., Xu, X. J., Gao, C., Ran, Q., & Xu, Y. (2015) · Journal of Zhejiang University. Science A · doi:10.1631/jzus.a1400123 · Cited by 8
Approaches to evaluating model quality across different regime types in environmental and public health governance
MacGillivray, B. H., & Richards, K. (2015) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.002 · Cited by 9
Models and the common good
Saltelli, A. (2025) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106430 · Cited by 7
Life Cycle Assessment of agri-food systems
Basset-Mens, C., Avadí, Á., Bessou, C., Acosta-Alba, I., Biard, Y., & Payen, S. (2021) · Éditions Quæ eBooks · doi:10.35690/978-2-7592-3467-7 · Cited by 15
On unpredictable events in risk analysis
Glette‐Iversen, I., & Flage, R. (2024) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106652 · Cited by 7
Impact Assessment of Genetically Engineered Trees: An Overview on Risk Assessment and Management
James, D. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4363-6_16 · Cited by 7
Are we ready to be wrong? Extended peer community for quality science-advice in uncertainty
Kim, M. H., & Dankel, D. J. (2024) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2024.103520 · Cited by 5
Significant Digits: Responsible Use of Quantitative Information
Daniel, A., Vladimir, S., Jerome, R., Jeroen, V. D. S., Giampietro, M., Dorothy, J. D., Philip, B., Zora, K., Saltelli, A., & JOHN, K. A. (2015) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2760/555227 · Cited by 7
Uncertainty, complexity and controversy in dolphin threat management: A role for post-normal science?
Palliser, A., & Dodson, G. (2017) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.09.004 · Cited by 7
Uncertainty Analysis in River Modelling
Warmink, J. J., & Booij, M. J. (2015) · GeoPlanet: earth and planetary sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17719-9_11 · Cited by 7
On the Difference Between Risk as Seen From the Perspectives of the Analysts and Management
Aven, T. (2016) · ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4032002 · Cited by 7
Quality of epidemiological studies: Procedural rules for uncertain science for policy, a case study on bisphenol-A
Maxim, L., & van der Sluijs, J. P. (2018) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.010 · Cited by 7
Recommended practices in global sensitivity analysis
Saltelli, A., Vidoni, D., & Mascherini, M. (2009) · NATO science for peace and security series. C, Environmental security · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2636-1_8 · Cited by 7
Climate Change as Risk
Hillerbrand, R. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_13 · Cited by 82
The economic and livelihood value of provisioning services of the Ga-Mampa wetland South Africa
Adekola, O. A., Morardet, S., de Groot, R. S., & Grelot, F. (2008) · HAL · Cited by 7
Treating Nanoparticles with Precaution
Wickson, F., Gillund, F. T., & Myhr, A. I. (2010) · Pan Stanford Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1201/b11126-32 · Cited by 7
The Enigma of Knowledge in the Risk Field
Aven, T., & Ylönen, M. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781119317906.ch2 · Cited by 7
Sensitivity auditing
Piano, S. L., Sheikholeslami, R., Puy, A., & Saltelli, A. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198872412.003.0008 · Cited by 6
Technology assessment and postnormal science
Børsen, T. (2024) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2024.103515 · Cited by 6
Comparability of LCAs — Review and Discussion of the Application Purpose
Roßmann, M., Stratmann, M., Rötzer, N., Schäfer, P., & Schmidt, M. (2020) · Sustainable production, life cycle engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50519-6_15 · Cited by 6
An uncertainty management framework to support model-based definition and enterprise
Goher, K., Al-Ashaab, A., Sarfraz, S., & Shehab, E. (2023) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2023.103944 · Cited by 6
A risk science perspective on vaccines
Glette‐Iversen, I., Aven, T., & Flage, R. (2023) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.14228 · Cited by 6
Applying Bayesian model averaging for uncertainty estimation of input data in energy modelling
Culka, M. (2014) · Energy Sustainability and Society · doi:10.1186/s13705-014-0021-9 · Cited by 6
Gobernanza nanotecnológica: por qué no podemos confiar en evaluaciones de riesgo científicas
Wickson, F. (2015) · Mundo Nano Revista Interdisciplinaria en Nanociencia y Nanotecnología · doi:10.22201/ceiich.24485691e.2011.1.50988 · Cited by 6
Quantitative microbial risk assessment: methods and quality assurance
Boone, I., der Stede, Y. V., Aerts, M., Mintiens, K., & Daube, G. (2010) · Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift · doi:10.21825/vdt.87467 · Cited by 6
Current practice and challenges towards handling uncertainty for effective outcomes in maintenance
Grenyer, A., Dinmohammadi, F., Erkoyuncu, J. A., Zhao, Y., & Roy, R. (2019) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.024 · Cited by 6
L’épreuve d’acceptabilité sociale, ou la composition disputée du collectif
Barbier, R. (2021) · Revue internationale de Psychosociologie · doi:10.3917/rips1.069.0045 · Cited by 6
Understanding the Dynamics Between Forest Landscapes and Rural Livelihoods: A Case Study from Central India
Saxena, A., & Güneralp, B. (2022) · Managing forest ecosystems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88555-7_14 · Cited by 6
Contaminação química: respostas das instituições responsáveis e ações das populações atingidas no Brasil e em Portugal
Fernandes, L. D. O., Nunes, J. A., & Porto, M. F. (2016) · Saúde e Sociedade · doi:10.1590/s0104-12902016145753 · Cited by 8
Posiva biosphere assessment: Revised structure and status 2006
Ikonen, A. T. K. (2006) · Cited by 6
Modelling Climate Change Impacts for Adaptation Assessments
Dessai, S., & van der Sluijs, J. P. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119951445.ch6 · Cited by 6
Safety assessments undertaken using the BIOMASS methodology: lessons learnt and methodological enhancements
Lindborg, T., Brown, J. B., Griffault, L. Y., Ikonen, A. T. K., Kautsky, U., Sanae, S., Smith, G. M., Smith, K. L., Thorne, M. C., & Walke, R. (2022) · Journal of Radiological Protection · doi:10.1088/1361-6498/ac563c · Cited by 5
Impacts of acid deposition at Plastic Lake: forecasting chemical recovery using a Bayesian calibration and uncertainty propagation approach
MacDougall, G., Aherne, J., & Watmough, S. A. (2009) · Hydrology research · doi:10.2166/nh.2009.084 · Cited by 5
Characterizations of COVID-19 risk: review and suggestions for improvement of current practices
Glette‐Iversen, I., Seif, A., & Aven, T. (2023) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2023.2208128 · Cited by 5
Unwissenschaftlich weil unsicher? Unsicher weil wissenschaftlich!
Hillerbrand, R., & Schneider, C. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-00897-0_7 · Cited by 4
Risk and reliability evaluation of gas connector systems using fuzzy theory and expert elicitation
Olawoyin, R. (2017) · Cogent Engineering · doi:10.1080/23311916.2017.1372731 · Cited by 5
Evaluating uncertainties in an integrated approach for chemical risk assessment under REACH: more certain decisions?
Vermeire, T. G. (2009) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 5
On the importance of input variables and climate variability to the yield of urban water supply systems
King, D. (2009) · Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) · Cited by 5

Authors: Van Der Sluijs, J. P., Craye, M., Funtowicz, S., Kloprogge, P., Ravetz, J., & Risbey, J.
Affiliations: Joint Research Centre (IT)
Utrecht University (NL)
European Commission (BE)
Monash University (AU)
ORCID: Funtowicz, Silvio
Risbey, James
Venue: Risk Analysis
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2005-04
Volume: 25
Issue: 2
Pages: 481-492
ISSN: 0272-4332 (ISSN-L)
1539-6924
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00604.x
OpenAlex: W2119214313
Cited by: 426
References: 19
Citations by year: 2026: 13 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
FWCI: 65.98
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
dspace.library.uu.nl
Licence: other-oa
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 33 d)
Locations: Risk Analysis (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Risk and Safety Analysis
Keywords: uncertainty analysis, multidimensional uncertainty, pedigree analysis, parameter sensitivity, model assumptions, diagnostic diagrams, problem framing, deliberative decision-making, collective learning, environmental assessment, model-based evaluation
MeSH terms: Vehicle Emissions, Computer Simulation, Environment, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollutants, Models, Theoretical, Public Health, Software, Systems Theory, Models, Statistical, Risk Assessment, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Uncertainty in Model‐Based Environmental Assessment: The NUSAP System

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks