Cited by 426Environmental and Social Impact AssessmentsProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignRisk and Safety Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Uncertainty in Model‐Based Environmental Assessment: The NUSAP System

Open access

Van Der Sluijs, Jeroen P., Craye, Matthieu, Funtowicz, Silvio, Kloprogge, Penny, Ravetz, Jerry, Risbey, James·2005·Risk Analysis

DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00604.x

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article discusses recent experiences with the Numeral Unit Spread Assessment Pedigree (NUSAP) system for multidimensional uncertainty assessment, based on four case studies that vary in complexity. We show that the NUSAP method is applicable not only to relatively simple calculation schemes but also to complex models in a meaningful way and that NUSAP is useful to assess not only parameter uncertainty but also (model) assumptions. A diagnostic diagram can be used to synthesize results of quantitative analysis of parameter sensitivity and qualitative review (pedigree analysis) of parameter strength. It provides an analytic tool to prioritize uncertainties according to quantitative and qualitative insights in the limitations of available knowledge. We show that extension of the pedigree scheme to include societal dimensions of uncertainty, such as problem framing and value‐laden assumptions, further promotes reflexivity and collective learning. When used in a deliberative setting, NUSAP pedigree assessment has the potential to foster a deeper social debate and a negotiated management of complex environmental problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00604.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The Uses of Argument
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments
Morris, M. D. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804 · Cited by 4,943
Science for the post-normal age
Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993) · Futures · doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-l · Cited by 4,639
Self-citation
Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences
Орескес, Н., Shrader‐Frechette, K., & Belitz, K. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.263.5147.641 · Cited by 3,026
Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments
Morris, M. D. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269043 · Cited by 2,648
Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models
McCulloch, A. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2005.358_16.x · Cited by 1,866
Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., & Ratto, M. (2004) · Cited by 1,797
Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1990) · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0621-1 · Cited by 1,575
Self-citation
Sensitivity Analysis in Practice
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., & Ratto, M. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470870958 · Cited by 526
On the Relative Importance of Input Factors in Mathematical Models
Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2002) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214502388618447 · Cited by 448

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

Craye M., 2001, Milieu en gezondheid in Vlaanderen: naar en adequate dialoog tussen overheid, bevolking en wetenschap
Van der Sluijs J. P., 1997, Anchoring amid uncertainty; On the management of uncertainties in risk assessment of anthropogenic climate change
Van der Sluijs J. P. Risbey J. S. &Ravetz J. R.(in press).Uncertainty assessment of VOC emissions from paint in the Netherlands.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.
EEA, 2003, EMEP/CORINAIR Emission Inventory Guidebook
Kloprogge P., 2005, A Method for the Analysis of Assumptions in Assessments Applied to Two Indicators in the Fifth Dutch Environmental Outlook
Aelvoet W., 1998, Risico op gezondheidsschade bij kinderen van de Neerlandwijk te Wilrijk
Schoeters G., 1998, Studie van gezondheidsaspecten en gezondheidsrisico's ten gevolge van milieuverontreiniging in de Neerlandwijk te Wilrijk
Koppen G., 2001, Biomonitoringsonderzoek 50‐65j vrouwen en 21‐40j mannen: evaluatie van de relatie milieu‐gezondheid op basis van meting van biomerkers
Staessen J., 2001, Koepeltekst biomonitoring bij adolescenten: een gevoelige nieuwe methode voor het inschatten van verontreiniging van het leefmilieu en geassocieerde gezondheidsrisico's
Van de Graaf H., 2000, Beleid en Politiek
Von Schomberg R., 1997, Argumentatie in de context van een wetenschappelijke controverse

Sorted by citations

Forest disturbances under climate change
Seidl, R., Thom, D., Kautz, M., Martin-Benito, D., Peltoniemi, M., Vacchiano, G., Wild, J., Ascoli, D., Petr, M., Honkaniemi, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3303 · Cited by 2,878
Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation
Aven, T. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 · Cited by 1,713
“…and Pedigree) ( Funtowicz & Ravetz, 1990, 1993; Kloprogge, van der Sluijs, & Pe-tersen, 2005, 2011; Laes, Meskens, & van der Sluijs, 2011; van der Sluijs et al., 2005a, 2005b ), originally designed for the purpose of analysis and diagnosis of uncertainty in science for policy by performing a…”
Background
Characterising performance of environmental models
Bennett, N. D., Croke, B. F. W., Guariso, G., Guillaume, J. H. A., Hamilton, S. H., Jakeman, A. J., Marsili-Libelli, S., Newham, L. T. H., Norton, J. P., Perrin, C., et al. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.011 · Cited by 1,536
Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis
Teng, J., Jakeman, A. J., Vaze, J., Croke, B., Dutta, D., & Kim, S. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006 · Cited by 1,473
Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process – A framework and guidance
Refsgaard, J. C., van der Sluijs, J. P., Højberg, A. L., & Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2007) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.02.004 · Cited by 1,200
Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models
Jakeman, A. J., Letcher, R., & Norton, J. P. (2006) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.01.004 · Cited by 1,113
Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda
Hessels, L. K., & van Lente, H. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.008 · Cited by 779
Gridded global datasets for Gross Domestic Product and Human Development Index over 1990–2015
Kummu, M., Taka, M., & Guillaume, J. H. A. (2018) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.4 · Cited by 754
Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy
Morgan, M. G. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319946111 · Cited by 759
Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making
Authority, E. G. F. T. C. O. S. R. E. F. S. (2010) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1637 · Cited by 693
Opinion of the Scientific Committee related to Uncertainties in Dietary Exposure Assessment
(EFSA), E. F. S. A. (2007) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2007.438 · Cited by 676
The Future of Sensitivity Analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support
Razavi, S., Jakeman, A. J., Saltelli, A., Prieur, C., Iooss, B., Borgonovo, E., Plischke, E., Piano, S. L., Iwanaga, T., Becker, W., et al. (2020) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104954 · Cited by 703
Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously
Brown, J. A. (2008) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2008.08.002 · Cited by 588
A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error
Refsgaard, J. C., van der Sluijs, J. P., Brown, J., & van der Keur, P. (2006) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.11.013 · Cited by 536
Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making
Ascough, J. C., Maier, H. R., Ravalico, J. K., & Strudley, M. W. (2008) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.015 · Cited by 552
The Role of Expert Opinion in Environmental Modelling
Krueger, T., Page, T., Hubacek, K., Smith, L., & Hiscock, K. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011 · Cited by 413
Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC?
Hulme, M., & Mahony, M. (2010) · Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133310373719 · Cited by 401
Toward a Relational Concept of Uncertainty: about Knowing Too Little, Knowing Too Differently, and Accepting Not to Know
Brugnach, M., Dewulf, A., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Taillieu, T. (2008) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-02616-130230 · Cited by 397
Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models
Bebbington, J., Brown, J. A., & Frame, B. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.10.021 · Cited by 365
Storyline approach to the construction of regional climate change information
Shepherd, T. G. (2019) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2019.0013 · Cited by 331
Merging validation and evaluation of ecological models to ‘evaludation’: A review of terminology and a practical approach
Augusiak, J., den Brink, P. J. V., & Grimm, V. (2013) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.009 · Cited by 326
A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication
Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2020) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662520942122 · Cited by 291
Deconstructing adaptive management: criteria for applications to environmental management.
Gregory, R. S., Ohlson, D., & Arvai, J. (2006) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2411:damcfa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 311
New foundations for ecological economics
Spash, C. L. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.004 · Cited by 291
The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure
Knol, A. B., Slottje, P., van der Sluijs, J. P., & Lebret, E. (2010) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-9-19 · Cited by 296
A review of catchment-scale water quality and erosion models and a synthesis of future prospects
Fu, B., Merritt, W., Croke, B., Weber, T. R., & Jakeman, A. J. (2018) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.12.008 · Cited by 273
What is wrong with evidence based policy, and how can it be improved?
Saltelli, A., & Giampietro, M. (2017) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2016.11.012 · Cited by 264
Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: A decision-focused approach
Failing, L., Gregory, R., & Harstone, M. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.010 · Cited by 247
The principles and methods behind EFSA's Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessment
Benford, D., Halldorsson, T. I., Jeger, M. J., Knutsen, H. K., More, S. J., Naegeli, H., Noteborn, H. P. J. M., Ockleford, C., Ricci, A., Rychen, G., et al. (2018) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5122 · Cited by 248
Ethical principles in machine learning and artificial intelligence: cases from the field and possible ways forward
Lo Piano, S. (2020) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-020-0501-9 · Cited by 229
A framework for uncertainty analysis in flood risk management decisions
Hall, J. W., & SOLOMATINE, D. P. (2008) · International Journal of River Basin Management · doi:10.1080/15715124.2008.9635339 · Cited by 244
The cost of direct air capture and storage can be reduced via strategic deployment but is unlikely to fall below stated cost targets
Young, J., McQueen, N., Charalambous, C., Foteinis, S., Hawrot, O., Ojeda, M., Pilorgé, H., Andresen, J., Psarras, P., Renforth, P., et al. (2023) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2023.06.004 · Cited by 239
Eight grand challenges in socio-environmental systems modeling
Elsawah, S., Filatova, T., Jakeman, A. J., Kettner, A. J., Zellner, M. L., Athanasiadis, I. N., Hamilton, S. H., Axtell, R. L., Brown, D. G., Gilligan, J. M., et al. (2020) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling · doi:10.18174/sesmo.2020a16226 · Cited by 205
Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: views from the Dutch science-policy interface
Wardekker, A., van der Sluijs, J. P., Janssen, P. H., Kloprogge, P., & Petersen, A. C. (2008) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2008.05.005 · Cited by 189
Self-citation
Modelling net-zero emissions energy systems requires a change in approach
Pye, S., Broad, O., Bataille, C., Brockway, P. E., Daly, H., Freeman, R., Gambhir, A., Geden, O., Rogan, F., Sanghvi, S., et al. (2020) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1824891 · Cited by 187
Introduction to Sensitivity Analysis
Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470725184.ch1 · Cited by 310
Navigating uncertainty in environmental composite indicators
Burgass, M. J., Halpern, B. S., Nicholson, E., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2017) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.034 · Cited by 176
Expert assessment concludes negative emissions scenarios may not deliver
Vaughan, N. E., & Gough, C. (2016) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095003 · Cited by 213
Brokerage at the science–policy interface: from conceptual framework to practical guidance
Gluckman, P. D., Bardsley, A., & Kaiser, M. (2021) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-021-00756-3 · Cited by 184
Uncertainty and climate change adaptation : a scoping study
Dessai, S., & van der Sluijs, J. P. (2007) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 169
Post-Normal Science
Strand, R. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315679747.ch28 · Cited by 163
Identification and classification of uncertainties in the application of environmental models
Warmink, J. J., Janssen, J., Booij, M. J., & Krol, M. S. (2010) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.011 · Cited by 154
The added value of participatory modelling in fisheries management – what has been learnt?
Röckmann, C., Ulrich, C., Dreyer, M., Bell, E., Borodzicz, E. P., Haapasaari, P., Hauge, K. H., Howell, D., Mäntyniemi, S., Miller, D., et al. (2012) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.027 · Cited by 159
A methodology for the design and development of integrated models for policy support
van Delden, H., Seppelt, R., White, R. W., & Jakeman, A. J. (2010) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.021 · Cited by 160
Why Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) Challenge Traditional Risk Assessment and How to Respond
Futran Fuhrman, V., Tal, A., & Arnon, S. (2015) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.012 · Cited by 152
Evaluating integrated assessment models of global climate change
Schwanitz, V. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.005 · Cited by 134
Closing global knowledge gaps: Producing generalized knowledge from case studies of social-ecological systems
Magliocca, N. R., Ellis, E. C., Allington, G. R. H., de Bremond, A., Dell’Angelo, J., Mertz, O., Messerli, P., Meyfroidt, P., Seppelt, R., & Verburg, P. H. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.003 · Cited by 157
Governance, Scale and the Environment: The Importance of Recognizing Knowledge Claims in Transdisciplinary Arenas
Buizer, M., Arts, B. J. M., & Kok, K. I. (2011) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03908-160121 · Cited by 140
A guide to good practice in modeling semantics for authors and referees
Beven, K. J., & Young, P. C. (2013) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/wrcr.20393 · Cited by 138
Best practices and recent advances in CCS cost engineering and economic analysis
van der Spek, M. W., Roussanaly, S., & Rubin, E. S. (2019) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.02.006 · Cited by 139
Building better science-policy interfaces for international environmental governance: assessing potential within the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
Koetz, T., Farrell, K. N., & Bridgewater, P. B. (2011) · International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-011-9152-z · Cited by 149
Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC
Swart, R. J., Bernstein, L., Ha‐Duong, M., & Petersen, A. C. (2008) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9444-7 · Cited by 138
Effective modeling for Integrated Water Resource Management: A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities
Badham, J., Elsawah, S., Guillaume, J. H. A., Hamilton, S. H., Hunt, R. J., Jakeman, A. J., Pierce, S. A., Snow, V. O., Babbar‐Sebens, M., Fu, B., et al. (2019) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.013 · Cited by 135
Evaluating process-based integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation
Wilson, C., Guivarch, C., Kriegler, E., van Ruijven, B. J., van Vuuren, D. P., Krey, V., Schwanitz, V. J., & Thompson, E. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03099-9 · Cited by 146
Improving risk characterisations in practical situations by highlighting knowledge aspects, with applications to risk matrices
Aven, T. (2017) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.006 · Cited by 132
A method for the analysis of assumptions in model-based environmental assessments
Kloprogge, P., van der Sluijs, J. P., & Petersen, A. C. (2009) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.06.009 · Cited by 130
Self-citation
Exploring the quality of evidence for complex and contested policy decisions
van der Sluijs, J. P., Petersen, A. C., Janssen, P. H., Risbey, J. S., & Ravetz, J. R. (2008) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/024008 · Cited by 130
Self-citation
Introduction to Sensitivity Analysis
Iooss, B., & Saltelli, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12385-1_31 · Cited by 125
Where Now for Post-Normal Science?: A Critical Review of its Development, Definitions, and Uses
Turnpenny, J. R., Jones, M., & Lorenzoni, I. (2010) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243910385789 · Cited by 122
Climate change vulnerability of sustainable forest management in the Eastern Alps
Seidl, R., Rammer, W., & Lexer, M. J. (2010) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9899-1 · Cited by 117
Quantitative Storytelling in the Making of a Composite Indicator
Kuc-Czarnecka, M. E., Piano, S. L., & Saltelli, A. (2020) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-020-02276-0 · Cited by 120
Uncertainty analysis in the techno-economic assessment of CO2 capture and storage technologies. Critical review and guidelines for use
van der Spek, M. W., Fout, T., García, M., Kuncheekanna, V. N., Matuszewski, M., McCoy, S., Morgan, J. C., Nazir, S. M., Ramírez, A., Roussanaly, S., et al. (2020) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103113 · Cited by 117
Frame-based guide to situated decision-making on climate change
de Boer, J., Wardekker, A., & van der Sluijs, J. P. (2010) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.003 · Cited by 116
The interaction triangle as a tool for understanding stakeholder interactions in marine ecosystem based management
Röckmann, C., van Leeuwen, J., Goldsborough, D., Kraan, M., & Piet, G. J. (2014) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.10.019 · Cited by 114
Post-Normal Science in Practice at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Petersen, A. C., Cath, A., Hage, M. D. S. C., Kunseler, E., & van der Sluijs, J. P. (2010) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243910385797 · Cited by 130
Social Ecological Economics: Understanding the Past to See the Future
Spash, C. L. (2011) · American Journal of Economics and Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00777.x · Cited by 112
Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: Review and evaluation of frameworks
Grieger, K., Linkov, I., Hansen, S. F., & Baun, A. (2011) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2011.569095 · Cited by 111
Epistemic uncertainties and natural hazard risk assessment – Part 1: A review of different natural hazard areas
Beven, K. J., Almeida, S., Aspinall, W. P., Bates, P., Blazkova, S. D., Borgomeo, E., Freer, J. E., Goda, K., Hall, J. W., Phillips, J. C., et al. (2018) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-18-2741-2018 · Cited by 110
Perceptions and communication strategies for the many uncertainties relevant for climate policy
Patt, A., & Weber, E. U. (2013) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.259 · Cited by 125
Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making: strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance
Dewulf, A. R. P. J., & Biesbroek, R. G. (2018) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1080/14494035.2018.1504484 · Cited by 108
A protocol for horizontal averaging of unit process data—including estimates for uncertainty
Henriksson, P. J. G., Guinée, J. B., Heijungs, R., de Koning, A., & Green, D. M. (2013) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-013-0647-4 · Cited by 103
Estimating the effect of entrepreneur education on graduates’ intention to be entrepreneurs
-, N. B. M., Lim, H. E., Yusof, N., & Soon, J. (2015) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-03-2014-0030 · Cited by 103
How some types of risk assessments can support resilience analysis and management
Aven, T. (2017) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2017.07.005 · Cited by 102
A conceptual approach to a citizens’ observatory – supporting community-based environmental governance
Liu, H.-Y., Kobernus, M., Broday, D. M., & Bartoňová, A. (2014) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-13-107 · Cited by 101
Re-establishing an ecological discourse in the policy debate over how to value ecosystems and biodiversity
Spash, C. L., & Aslaksen, I. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.049 · Cited by 125
Pandemic Preparedness and the Influenza Risk Assessment Tool (IRAT)
Cox, N. J., Trock, S. C., & Burke, S. A. (2014) · Current topics in microbiology and immunology · doi:10.1007/82_2014_419 · Cited by 98
The epistemic, ethical, and political dimensions of uncertainty in integrated assessment modeling
Beck, M., & Krueger, T. (2016) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.415 · Cited by 118
A framework for characterising and evaluating the effectiveness of environmental modelling
Hamilton, S. H., Fu, B., Guillaume, J. H. A., Badham, J., Elsawah, S., Gober, P. A., Hunt, R. J., Iwanaga, T., Jakeman, A. J., Ames, D. P., et al. (2019) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.04.008 · Cited by 104
Comparison of scale and scaling issues in integrated land-use models for policy support
van Delden, H., van Vliet, J., Rutledge, D. T., & Kirkby, M. J. (2011) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.005 · Cited by 94
Automated sub-zoning of water distribution systems
Perelman, L., Allen, M. P., Preis, A., Iqbal, M., & Whittle, A. J. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.11.025 · Cited by 87
Uncertainty and precaution in environmental management: Insights from the UPEM conference
van der Sluijs, J. P. (2006) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.020 · Cited by 84
Expressions of likelihood and confidence in the IPCC uncertainty assessment process
Risbey, J. S., & Kandlikar, M. (2007) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-007-9315-7 · Cited by 83
Self-citation
From data to decisions: Processing information, biases, and beliefs for improved management of natural resources and environments
Glynn, P. D., Voinov, A. A., Shapiro, C. D., & White, P. A. (2017) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1002/2016ef000487 · Cited by 98
Fit-for-purpose environmental modeling: Targeting the intersection of usability, reliability and feasibility
Hamilton, S. H., Pollino, C., Stratford, D., Fu, B., & Jakeman, A. J. (2021) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105278 · Cited by 89
Dealing with uncertainties in environmental burden of disease assessment
Knol, A. B., Petersen, A. C., van der Sluijs, J. P., & Lebret, E. (2009) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-8-21 · Cited by 80
Guidelines for Environmental Risk Assessment and Management
Leaves, G. (2011) · Cited by 80
The application of frameworks for measuring social vulnerability and resilience to geophysical hazards within developing countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
Ran, J., MacGillivray, B. H., Gong, Y., & Hales, T. C. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134486 · Cited by 80
Monte Carlo analysis of uncertainties in the Netherlands greenhouse gas emission inventory for 1990–2004
Ramírez, A., de Keizer, C., van der Sluijs, J. P., Olivier, J. G. J., & Brandes, L. (2008) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.059 · Cited by 79
Assessing model-based and conflict-based uncertainty
Patt, A. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.10.002 · Cited by 79
A new approach to link transport emissions and air quality: An intelligent transport system based on the control of traffic air pollution
Costabile, F., & Allegrini, I. (2007) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.03.001 · Cited by 76
Techno‐economic analysis (TEA) of microbial oil production from waste resources as part of a biorefinery concept: assessment at multiple scales under uncertainty
Parsons, S., Abeln, F., McManus, M. C., & Chuck, C. J. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.5811 · Cited by 73
A high-resolution integrated hydrology–hydrodynamic model of the Barataria Basin system
Inoue, M., PARK, D., Justić, D., & WISEMANJR, W. (2008) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.02.011 · Cited by 72
Agent-based modelling of socio-ecological systems: Models, projects and ontologies
Gotts, N. M., van Voorn, G. A. K., Polhill, G. J., de Jong, E., Edmonds, B., Hofstede, G. J., & Meyer, R. A. (2018) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2018.07.007 · Cited by 81
A tiered, system-of-systems modeling framework for resolving complex socio-environmental policy issues
Little, J. C., Hester, E. T., Elsawah, S., Filz, G. M., Sandu, A., Carey, C. C., Iwanaga, T., & Jakeman, A. J. (2018) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.11.011 · Cited by 77
Unravelling uncertainty and variability in early stage techno-economic assessments of carbon capture technologies
van der Spek, M. W., Fernández, E. S., Eldrup, N. H., Skagestad, R., Ramírez, A., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2016) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.11.021 · Cited by 71
Barriers to investment in utility-scale variable renewable electricity (VRE) generation projects
Hu, J., Harmsen, R., Crijns-Graus, W. H. J., & Worrell, E. (2018) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.092 · Cited by 71
An investigation of environmental and sustainability discourses associated with the substantive purposes of environmental assessment
Rozema, J. G., Bond, A., Cashmore, M., & Chilvers, J. (2011) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2011.11.003 · Cited by 69
Approaches to displaying information to assist decisions under uncertainty
Kreye, M. E., Goh, Y. M., Newnes, L., & Goodwin, P. (2011) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2011.05.010 · Cited by 68
Harnessing Ecosystem Models and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Support of Forest Management
Wolfslehner, B., & Seidl, R. (2009) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9414-5 · Cited by 66
Perceptual models of uncertainty for socio-hydrological systems: a flood risk change example
Westerberg, I. K., Baldassarre, G. D., Beven, K. J., Coxon, G., & Krueger, T. (2017) · Hydrological Sciences Journal · doi:10.1080/02626667.2017.1356926 · Cited by 61

Authors: Van Der Sluijs, J. P., Craye, M., Funtowicz, S., Kloprogge, P., Ravetz, J., & Risbey, J.
Affiliations: Joint Research Centre (IT)
Utrecht University (NL)
European Commission (BE)
Monash University (AU)
ORCID: Funtowicz, Silvio
Risbey, James
Venue: Risk Analysis
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2005-04
Volume: 25
Issue: 2
Pages: 481-492
ISSN: 0272-4332 (ISSN-L)
1539-6924
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00604.x
OpenAlex: W2119214313
Cited by: 426
References: 19
Citations by year: 2026: 13 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
FWCI: 65.98
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
dspace.library.uu.nl
Licence: other-oa
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 33 d)
Locations: Risk Analysis (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Risk and Safety Analysis
Keywords: uncertainty analysis, multidimensional uncertainty, pedigree analysis, parameter sensitivity, model assumptions, diagnostic diagrams, problem framing, deliberative decision-making, collective learning, environmental assessment, model-based evaluation
MeSH terms: Vehicle Emissions, Computer Simulation, Environment, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollutants, Models, Theoretical, Public Health, Software, Systems Theory, Models, Statistical, Risk Assessment, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Uncertainty in Model‐Based Environmental Assessment: The NUSAP System

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks