The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Minorities Continue to Be Excluded from Equal Employment Opportunities: Research on Labor Market and Institutional Barriers
Abstract
Barriers to equal occupational opportunities for minorities are examined at three stages of the employment process: the job candidate stage, the job entry stage, and the job promotion stage. Using the authors' recent survey of 4078 employers covering a nationally representative sample of jobs, four types of exclusionary barriers are investigated: “segregated networks” at the candidate stage, “information bias” and “statistical discrimination” at the entry stage, and “closed internal markets” at the promotion stage. Practical implications are drawn for equal employment opportunity policies directed toward occupational processes and employment outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65 · Cited by 6,001
Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.608 · Cited by 3,426
The Social Psychology of Stigma
Major, B., & O'Brien, L. T. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137 · Cited by 3,114
Jussim, L., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. (1996) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60240-3 · Cited by 555
Why Not Ascription? Organizations' Employment of Male and Female Managers
Reskin, B. F., & McBrier, D. B. (2000) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657438 · Cited by 501
Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000022 · Cited by 488
Minimizing Workplace Gender and Racial Bias
Bielby, W. T. (2000) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2654937 · Cited by 311
Reconsidering the Declining Significance of Race: Racial Differences in Early Career Wages
Cancio, A. S., Evans, T. D., & Maume, D. J. (1996) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096391 · Cited by 206
The ethical use of artificial intelligence in human resource management: a decision-making framework
Bankins, S. (2021) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-021-09619-6 · Cited by 181
Measuring Employment Discrimination through Controlled Experiments
Bendick, M., Jackson, C. W., & Reinoso, V. A. (1994) · The Review of Black Political Economy · doi:10.1007/bf02895739 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- Braddock, J. H., & McPartland, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-39
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W1990150066
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
