The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mental Health Support Groups, Stigma, and Self-Esteem: Positive and Negative Implications of Group Identification: Mental Health and Stigma
Abstract
Research into the relationship between stigmatization and well-being suggests that identification with a stigmatized group can buffer individuals from the adverse effects of stigma. In part, this is because social identification is hypothesized to provide a basis for social support which increases resistance to stigma and rejection of negative in-group stereotypes. The present research tests this model among individuals with mental health problems. As hypothesized, group identification predicted increased social support, stereotype rejection, and stigma resistance. These self-protective mechanisms were in turn found to predict higher levels of self-esteem. However, the general effect of these associations was to suppress a negative relationship between social identification and self-esteem. This confirms that the positive impact of identification lies in its capacity to provide access to stress-buffering mechanisms but also indicates that the impact of identification with a severely stigmatized group is not necessarily positive. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 · Cited by 13,339
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422 · Cited by 11,335
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408 · cited 1×
“We also report the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; see Steiger, 1990), which is based on the proportion of variance not explained in the model.”
MethodThe Social Psychology of Stigma
Major, B., & O'Brien, L. T. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137 · Cited by 3,114
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 · Cited by 2,714
Self-citationTaking the strain: Social identity, social support, and the experience of stress
Haslam, S. A., O'Brien, A., Jetten, J., Vormedal, K., & Penna, S. (2005) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466605x37468 · Cited by 771
Self-citationSchmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772143000058 · Cited by 532
Stressing the group: Social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress.
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1037 · Cited by 502
Self-citation
Cited by
The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: A meta-analytic review.
Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Postmes, T., & Garcia, A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0035754 · Cited by 1,804
Self-citationSocial Identity, Health and Well‐Being: An Emerging Agenda for Applied Psychology
Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & Haslam, C. (2009) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00379.x · Cited by 1,301
Self-citationThe future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media
Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., Marsch, L. A., & Bartels, S. J. (2016) · Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences · doi:10.1017/s2045796015001067 · Cited by 1,180
Jetten, J., Haslam, S. A., Cruwys, T., Greenaway, K. H., Haslam, C., & Steffens, N. K. (2017) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2333 · Cited by 542
Self-citationCruwys, T., Dingle, G. A., Haslam, C., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., & Morton, T. A. (2013) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.013 · Cited by 525
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Crabtree, J. W., Haslam, S. A., Postmes, T., & Haslam, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09-02
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 553-569
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1586339292
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 39.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mental Health Support Groups, Stigma, and Self-Esteem: Positive and Negative Implications of Group Identification: Mental Health and Stigma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01662.x
- The paper
- Crabtree, J. W., Haslam, S. A., Postmes, T., & Haslam, C. (2010). Mental Health Support Groups, Stigma, and Self-Esteem: Positive and Negative Implications of Group Identification: Mental Health and Stigma. Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01662.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
