Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

L2 Word Recognition Research: A Critical Review

KODA, KEIKO·1996·The Modern Language Journal
DOI 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb05465.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The major purpose of this paper is to explore conceptual syntheses that advance second language (L2) word recognition research and, in so doing, uncover new agendas relating to cross‐linguistic examinations of L2 processing. The paper first describes connections between word recognition and reading and the specific ways in which efficient word recognition contributes to comprehension performance. It then provides a brief overview of the connectionist construct and an expanded consideration of word recognition skills development from this vantage point. Further, it illustrates cross‐linguistic variations in word recognition processes by comparing and contrasting response patterns among readers in different orthographic systems. Finally, the paper explores conceptual frameworks for L2 word recognition, through which ongoing L2 empirical studies are subsequently examined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb05465.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Adams M. J., 1990, Beginning to read.
  2. Adams M. J., 1994, Theoretical models and processes of reading, 830
  3. 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90013-1 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.2307/747673 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bates E., 1989, The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing, 3
  6. 10.3102/0013189X020003010 · DOI
  7. Bernhardt E. B., 1991, Reading development in a second language.
  8. Brown T., 1985, The development of reading skills, 19
  9. Daneman M., 1991, Handbook of reading research, 512
  10. 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.561 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61507-1 · DOI
  13. 10.1017/S0142716400004264 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0278-7393.20.1.116 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.1.116
  15. Frost R., 1987, Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographic depth: A multilingual comparison, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104
  16. Gairns B.(1992).Cognitive processing in ESL reading.Unpublished master's thesis Ohio University Athens OH.
  17. Gass S., 1983, Language transfer in language learning.
  18. 10.1016/B978-0-12-583680-7.50017-5 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/026765838700300202 · DOI
  20. Hatta T., 1978, Recognition of Japanese Kanji and Hirakana in the left and right visual fields, Japanese Journal of Psychology, 20, 51
  21. 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90109-Y · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0093-934X(85)90086-0 · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(85)90086-0
  23. Haynes M., 1990, Reading and its development: Component skills approaches, 375
  24. Henderson L., 1984, Orthographies and reading: Perspective from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology and linguistics.
  25. 10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243 · Paper page
  27. 10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Just M. A., 1987, The psychology of reading and language comprehension.
  29. 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62789-2 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kellerman E., 1986, Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition.
  31. Kilborn K., 1989, The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, 257
  32. 10.1177/026765838800400203 · DOI
  33. Koda K., 1989, Effects of L1 orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 201, 10.1007/BF01067782 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb02780.x · DOI
  35. 10.1017/S0272263100009499 · DOI
  36. 10.1017/S0142716400006950 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Lee C. D., 1992, The symbolic and connectionist paradigms: Closing the gap, 179
  39. 10.1177/074193258500600607 · DOI
  40. McConkie G. W. &Zola D.(1981).Language constraints and the functional stimulus in reading. InA. M.Lesgold&C. A.Perfetti(Eds.) Interactive process in reading(155–175). · DOI
  41. 10.1037/0096-3445.114.2.159 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1126/science.241.4871.1293 · DOI
  43. Muljani D., Development of L2 word recognition, Applied Psycholinguistic.
  44. 10.3102/00028312024002237 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.864 · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.864
  46. Perfetti C. A., 1985, Reading ability.
  47. Perfetti C. A., 1991, Learning to read, 33
  48. Perfetti C. A., 1977, Cognitive process in comprehension, 141
  49. Perfetti C. A., 1979, Theory and practice of early reading, 57
  50. 10.1126/science.504987 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1007/BF02686669 · DOI
  52. Ryan A., 1991, The case of invisible vowels: Arabic speakers reading English words, Reading in a Foreign Language, 7, 531
  53. 10.4992/jjpsy.52.266 · DOI
  54. Saito H., 1979, Information processing of Kanji (Chinese characters) and Kana (Japanese characters): The close relationship among graphemic, phonemic, and semantic aspects, Psychologia, 22, 195
  55. 10.1017/S0142716400009371 · DOI
  56. 10.1017/S0272263100012584 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/S0093-934X(75)80077-0 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Sasanuma S., 1984, Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology and linguistics, 43
  59. Segalowitz N. S., 1986, Language processing in bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and neurological perspectives, 3
  60. Segalowitz N. S., 1991, Lower level components or reading skill in higher level bilinguals: Implications for reading instruction, AILA Review, 8, 15
  61. 10.1017/S0142716400010845 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Slobin D. I., 1985, The cross‐linguistic study of language acquisition, Vol 1: The data, 3
  64. Stanovich K. E., 1988, Reading across the life span.
  65. Stanovich K. E., 1991, Learning to read, 19
  66. 10.2307/747605 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Turvey M. T., 1984, Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics, 81
  68. Tzeng O. J. L., 1983, The first two R's: The way different languages reduce speech to script affects how visual information is processed in the brain, American Scientist, 71, 238

Cited by

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
KODA, K.
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-12
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
450-460
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
DOI
10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb05465.x
OpenAlex
W1977620926
Cited by
214
References
2
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 5436 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: L2 Word Recognition Research: A Critical Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb05465.x
The paper
KODA, K. (1996). L2 Word Recognition Research: A Critical Review. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb05465.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.