The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chapter 4 The Reading Process is Different for Different Orthographies: The Orthographic Depth Hypothesis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Baluch, 1991, Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 644, 10.1037/0278-7393.17.4.644 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.4.644 · Paper page
- Besner, 1987, Orthographic and phonological codes in the oral reading of Japanese kana, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 335, 10.1037/0278-7393.13.2.335 · DOI
- Cossu, 1988, Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children, Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 1, 10.1017/S0142716400000424 · DOI · Paper page
- Feldman, 1983, Word recognition in Serbo-Croation is phonologically analytic, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 288, 10.1037/0096-1523.9.2.288 · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.9.2.288
- Frost, 1989, Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition, Memory & Cognition, 17, 302, 10.3758/BF03198468 · DOI
- Frost, 1987, Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104, 10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.104 · DOI · Paper page
- Katz, 1983, Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 157, 10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.157 · DOI
- Lukatela, 1990, Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 128
- Perfetti, 1988, Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking, Memory and Language, 27, 59, 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90048-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Sebastián-Gallés, 1991, Reading by analogy in a shallow orthography, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 471, 10.1037/0096-1523.17.2.471 · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.17.2.471
- Seidenberg, 1985, The time-course of phonological code activation in two writing systems, Cognition, 19, 1, 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90029-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Seidenberg, 1984, When does irregular spelling and pronunciation influence word recognition?, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383, 10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90270-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Tabossi, 1992, Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English, Memory & Cognition, 20, 315, 10.3758/BF03199667 · DOI
- Van Orden, 1990, Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics, Psychological Review, 97, 488, 10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.488 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.4.488 · Paper page
Cited by
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 · Cited by 2,871
Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618772271 · Cited by 1,297
Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth.
Schmalz, X., Marinus, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0835-2 · Cited by 195
L1 and L2 processing in the bilingual brain: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies
Liu, H., & Cao, F. (2016) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.013 · Cited by 178
SPARKS, R. L., PATTON, J., GANSCHOW, L., & HUMBACH, N. (2009) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716409990099 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Katz, L., & Frost, R.
- Venue
- Advances in Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1992
- Pages
- 67-84
- ISSN
- 0166-4115 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103070508
- Cited by
- 750
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.11
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chapter 4 The Reading Process is Different for Different Orthographies: The Orthographic Depth Hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62789-2
- The paper
- Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). Chapter 4 The Reading Process is Different for Different Orthographies: The Orthographic Depth Hypothesis. Advances in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62789-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
