The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together
Abstract
This article provides support for a theoretical orientation toward viewing dialogue as both a means of communication and a cognitive tool. Data to support this position come from an analysis of the language‐related episodes isolated in the dialogue of two grade 8 French immersion students as they carry out a jigsaw task. During the task, the students work out a story line and write it out. As they do so, they encounter linguistic problems. To solve them, the students use their first language (L1) and second language (L2) in order to communicate to each other and as tools to aid their L2 learning. The language‐related episodes discussed provide evidence of language use as both an enactment of mental processes and as an occasion for L2 learning. Variation in how other pairs of students in the class perform the task supports existing evidence that the same task does not provide similar occasions for L2 learning to all student dyads.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SWAIN, M., & LAPKIN, S. (1995) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/16.3.371 · Cited by 1,407
Self-citationThe Psycholinguistics of the Output Hypothesis
de Bot, K. (1996) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01246.x · Cited by 236
Cited by
Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections
Storch, N. (2005) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002 · Cited by 1,052
INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT: An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL
Mackey, A. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199004027 · Cited by 772
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000365 · Cited by 741
HOW DO LEARNERS PERCEIVE INTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK?
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100004010 · Cited by 630
Gass, S. M. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch9 · Cited by 542
Nation, P. (2007) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.2167/illt039.0 · Cited by 494
Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue
Leeser, M. J. (2004) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168804lr134oa · Cited by 419
Recasts in the Adult English L2 Classroom: Characteristics, Explicitness, and Effectiveness
LOEWEN, S., & PHILP, J. (2006) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.x · Cited by 408
Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108643689 · Cited by 407
LEARNERS’ PROCESSING, UPTAKE, AND RETENTION OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON WRITING: Case Studies
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990532 · Cited by 398
Interaction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377
Metatalk in a Pair Work Activity: Level of Engagement and Implications for Language Development
Storch, N. (2008) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658410802146644 · Cited by 329
The Effects of Task Repetition on Linguistic Output
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez‐Torres, M. J., & Fernández‐García, M. (1999) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00102 · Cited by 291
Baralt, M. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263113000429 · Cited by 195
“What Do You Want to Say?” How Adolescents Use Translanguaging to Expand Learning Opportunities
Martin-Beltrán, M. (2014) · International Multilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/19313152.2014.914372 · Cited by 186
Mixed methods research: toward new research designs in applied linguistics
Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x · Cited by 183
Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y. (2016) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.45.09bar · Cited by 152
Toth, P. D. (2008) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00441.x · Cited by 149
Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention
Sato, M. (2013) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12035.x · Cited by 142
Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: a research synthesis
Chen, T. (2016) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.960942 · Cited by 130
Repair Sequences in Spanish L2 Dyadic Discourse: A Descriptive Study
Buckwalter, P. (2001) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/0026-7902.00115 · Cited by 87
Investigating consciousness‐raising tasks: pedagogically targeted and non‐targeted learning gains
Eckerth, J. (2008) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00188.x · Cited by 53
6. Peer interaction in F2F and CMC contexts
Loewen, S., & Wolff, D. (2016) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.45.07loe · Cited by 50
3. Interaction or collaboration? Group dynamics in the foreign language classroom
Sato, M., & Viveros, P. (2016) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.45.04sat · Cited by 50
1. Peer interaction and learning: A focus on the silent learner
Fernández-Dobao, A. (2016) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.45.02fer · Cited by 46
Negotiated interaction in the L2 classroom
Eckerth, J. (2009) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444808005442 · Cited by 39
PRONUNCIATION IN FACE-TO-FACE AND AUDIO-ONLY SYNCHRONOUS COMPUTER-MEDIATED LEARNER INTERACTIONS
Loewen, S., & Isbell, D. R. (2017) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263116000449 · Cited by 29
Eliciting Production of L2 Target Structures through Priming Activities
McDonough, K., Neumann, H., & Trofimovich, P. (2015) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.2023 · Cited by 27
Sato, M. (2015) · International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2015-0016 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- SWAIN, M., & LAPKIN, S.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 320-337
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2164217906
- Cited by
- 1,638
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 120.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.