Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 457

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role of Implicit Negative Feedback in SLA: Models and Recasts in Japanese and Spanish

LONG, MICHAEL H., INAGAKI, SHUNJI, ORTEGA, LOURDES·1998·The Modern Language Journal
DOI 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01213.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The role of implicit and explicit negative feedback in first (L1) and second (L2) language acquisition is contentious. The L2 studies to date, however, suggest that implicit negative feedback exists, is perceived by learners for what it is (i.e., noticed), and is used for development. As part of one of several continuing lines of research on this issue, two experiments were conducted to assess the relative utility of models and recasts in L2 Japanese and Spanish. Using a pretest, posttest, control group design, each study provided some evidence of the ability of adults to learn from implicit negative feedback, and, in one case, support for the notion that reactive implicit negative feedback (recasts) can be more effective than preemptive positive input (models) in achieving at least short‐term improvements on a previously unknown L2 structure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01213.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1177/014272378400501301 · DOI
  2. 10.1017/S0272263100009736 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0012-1649.26.2.221 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0012-1649.24.5.684 · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.5.684 · Paper page
  5. Brown R., 1970, Cognition and the development of language, 155
  6. Ellis R., 1994, The study of second language acquisition.
  7. 10.1017/S0305000900010904 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/0012-1649.28.1.90 · DOI
  9. Glass G.V., 1996, Statistical methods in education and psychology
  10. Herron C., 1988, Learning grammatical structures in a foreign language: Modelling versus feedback, The French Review, 61, 910
  11. Inagaki S., Studies on the acquisition of Japanese as a second language.
  12. Johnston M., 1994, Developmental stages and sequences for Spanish L2.
  13. Jorden E., 1988, Japanese: The spoken language
  14. 10.2307/3585484 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42014.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1017/S0272263100004848 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Long M. H., 1988, Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives, 115
  18. 10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Long M. H., 1998, Focus on form, 15
  20. Martin S. E., 1975, A reference grammar of Japanese.
  21. 10.1017/S0272263100004137 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Mito K., 1993, The effects of modelling and recasting on the acquisition of L2 grammar rules
  23. Nelson K. E., 1987, Children's language, 289
  24. Nelson K. E., 1989, The teachability of language, 263
  25. Nelson K. E., 1991, Biological and behavioral determinants of language development, 399
  26. Nelson K. E., 1984, The development of oral and written language: Readings in developmental and applied linguistics, 31
  27. 10.1017/S0272263100014418 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Ortega L., 1996, Adverb placement and the verb‐raising parameter in L2A: Some data on L1 English learners of Spanish
  29. Ortega L., 1997, The effects of models and recasts on the acquisition of object topicalization and adverb placement in L2 Spanish, Spanish Applied Linguistics, 1, 65
  30. 10.1017/S0272263100005829 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/applin/10.1.52 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Pinker S., 1989, The teachability of language.
  33. 10.1017/CBO9780511620690.006 · DOI
  34. Richardson M. A., 1993, Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition: Implications for SLA
  35. Richardson M. A., 1995, The use of negative evidence in second language acquisition of grammatical morphemes
  36. 10.1177/026765839100700202 · DOI
  37. Schmidt R. W., 1983, Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition, 137
  38. 10.1017/S0272263100011931 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1177/026765839200800102 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Silva‐Corvalan C., 1983, Discourse perspectives on syntax, 117
  41. 10.1017/CBO9780511620690.004 · DOI
  42. Swain M., 1991, Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom, 91
  43. 10.1017/S0142716400007827 · DOI
  44. 10.1017/S0272263100008408 · DOI
  45. 10.1017/S0272263100010317 · DOI
  46. 10.1177/026765839100700205 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Wilkins D., 1976, Notional syllabuses.

Cited by

See all 457

Metadata

Authors
LONG, M. H., INAGAKI, S., & ORTEGA, L.
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-09
Volume
82
Issue
3
Pages
357-371
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
DOI
10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01213.x
OpenAlex
W2105036931
Cited by
457
References
3
FWCI
85.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 4797 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.