Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Second Language Learners' Beliefs About Grammar Instruction and Error Correction

LOEWEN, SHAWN, LI, SHAOFENG, FEI, FEI, THOMPSON, AMY, NAKATSUKASA, KIMI, AHN, SEONGMEE, CHEN, XIAOQING·2009·The Modern Language Journal

Abstract

Learner beliefs are an important individual difference in second language (L2) learning. Furthermore, an ongoing debate surrounds the role of grammar instruction and error correction in the L2 classroom. Therefore, this study investigated the beliefs of L2 learners regarding the controversial role of grammar instruction and error correction. A total of 754 L2 students at an American university completed a questionnaire consisting of 37 Likert‐scale items and 4 open‐ended prompts. The quantitative items were submitted to a factor analysis, which identified 6 underlying factors (efficacy of grammar, negative attitude toward error correction, priority of communication, importance of grammar, importance of grammatical accuracy, and negative attitude toward grammar instruction). These factors were then used to investigate differences in beliefs among learners studying different target languages. In addition, themes emerging from the qualitative data were identified. The results indicate that among learners studying English as a second language and those studying a foreign language, there were varied beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.2307/479339 · doi:10.2307/479339
  2. 10.1111/j.1754-8845.1988.tb00285.x · doi:10.1111/j.1754-8845.1988.tb00285.x
  3. Ellis R., 2005, Analyzing learner language
  4. 10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Kunt N., 1997, Anxiety and beliefs about language learning: A study of Turkish‐speaking university students learning English in north Cyprus
  6. Oh M., 1996, Beliefs about language learning and foreign language anxiety: A study of American university students learning Japanese
  7. Samimy K., 1997, Beliefs about language learning: Perspectives of first‐year Chinese learners and their instructors, Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 32, 40
  8. Skutnabb‐Kangas T., 1976, Bilingualism, semilingualism and school achievement, Linguistische Berichte, 45, 55

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
LOEWEN, S., LI, S., FEI, F., THOMPSON, A., NAKATSUKASA, K., AHN, S., & CHEN, X.
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-09
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
91-104
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
OpenAlex
W2044284652
Cited by
274
References
52
FWCI
111.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second Language Learners' Beliefs About Grammar Instruction and Error Correction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x
The paper
LOEWEN, S., LI, S., FEI, F., THOMPSON, A., NAKATSUKASA, K., AHN, S., & CHEN, X. (2009). Second Language Learners' Beliefs About Grammar Instruction and Error Correction. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.