The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extending Lead‐User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers' Lead Userness*
Abstract
Lead users are found to come up with commercially attractive user innovations and have been shown to be a highly promising source of innovation for new product development tasks. According to lead‐user theory, these users are defined as being ahead of an important market trend and experiencing high benefits from innovating. The present article extends lead‐user theory by exploring the antecedents and consequences of consumers' lead userness in the course of three studies on extreme sports communities. Regarding antecedents, it uncovers that field‐related variables (consumer knowledge and use experience) as well as field‐independent personality variables (locus of control and innovativeness) help explain an individual's lead userness. These variables might therefore be used as a proxy to identify the rare species of lead users. With regard to consequences, it uncovers that lead users demonstrate innovative behavior not only by creating new product ideas but also by adopting new commercial products more heavily and faster than ordinary users. This highlights the idea that lead users might not only be valuable to idea‐generation processes for radically new concepts; instead, they might also be relevant to more general issues in the marketing of new products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
(2025) · doi:10.53555/acr.v2i2 · Cited by 13,264
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts
von Hippel, E. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791 · Cited by 4,650
Dimensions of Consumer Expertise
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209080 · Cited by 4,375
von Hippel, E. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2333.001.0001 · Cited by 3,768
EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: PERSONAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS AT WORK.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256657 · Cited by 3,749
Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development
Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845 · Cited by 3,748
Handbook of personality theory and research
Wilson, G. (1991) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90043-b · Cited by 3,538
Cited by
The Value of Codesign: The Effect of Customer Involvement in Service Design Teams
Trischler, J., Pervan, S. J., Kelly, S. J., & Scott, D. R. (2018) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670517714060 · Cited by 292
Ye, H. (., & Kankanhalli, A. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/12361 · Cited by 138
A Study of Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Mobile Payment Services in Vietnam
Liu, G.-S., & Tai, P. T. (2016) · Economics World · doi:10.17265/2328-7144/2016.06.001 · Cited by 92
Jiao, J., & Cao, X. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1450717 · Cited by 37
Preißner, S., Raasch, C., & Schweisfurth, T. (2024) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12709 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Schreier, M., & Prügl, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-20
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 331-346
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5885
- OpenAlex
- W3123090742
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 35.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extending Lead‐User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers' Lead Userness*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00305.x
- The paper
- Schreier, M., & Prügl, R. (2008). Extending Lead‐User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers' Lead Userness*. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00305.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.