When necessity is the mother of disruption: Users versus producers as sources of disruptive innovation
Open accessAbstract
This study investigates the sources of disruptive innovation. The disruptive innovation literature suggests that these do not originate from existing customers, in contrast to what is predicted by the user innovation literature. We compile a unique content‐analytical dataset based on 60 innovations identified as disruptive by the disruptive innovation literature. Using multinomial and binomial regression, we find that 43% of the sample disruptive innovations were originally developed by users. Disruptive innovations are more likely to originate from users (producers) if the environment has high turbulence in customer preferences (technology). Disruptive innovations that involve high functional (technological) novelty tend to be developed by users (producers). Users are also more likely to be the source of disruptive process innovations and to innovate in environments with weaker appropriability. Our article forges new links between the disruptive and the user innovation literatures, and offers guidance to managers on the likely source of disruptive threats.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Producer-driven disruptions center on technological innovations and often necessitate adjustments across the surrounding ecosystem.
“In contrast, producer-driven disruptions center on technological innovations and often necessitate adjustments across the surrounding ecosystem [10].”
From The Interactive Mechanism between Disruptive Innovation and Sustaining Innovation: A Re-examination Based on Christensen's Theory (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
User-driven disruptions focus on functional innovations and require sustaining improvements to achieve scale expansion.
“Preißner et al. indicated that user-driven disruptions focus on functional innovations and require sustaining improvements to achieve scale expansion [10].”
From The Interactive Mechanism between Disruptive Innovation and Sustaining Innovation: A Re-examination Based on Christensen's Theory (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1920110 · Cited by 3,470 · see citing works
Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products
Urban, G. L., & von Hippel, E. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.5.569 · Cited by 1,125 · see citing works
A Reflective Review of Disruptive Innovation Theory
Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2010) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Expert Chess Memory: Revisiting the Chunking Hypothesis
Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1998) · Memory · doi:10.1080/741942359 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tang, H. (2025) · Advances in Economics and Management Research · doi:10.56028/aemr.15.1.823.2025
“Preißner, Raasch, & Schweisfurth found that disruptive innovation can come from either users or producers, and the success of these sources depends on environmental turbulence and appropriation mechanisms [10].”
Influential
- Authors
- Preißner, S., Raasch, C., & Schweisfurth, T.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Kiel Institute for the World Economy (DE)
- Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Raasch, Christina
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-12-19
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-85
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5885
- OpenAlex
- W4389951255
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Product Innovation Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- tub.dok (Hamburg University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- TUHH Open Research (cc-by)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 768 33237764)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- disruptive innovation, user innovation, innovation sources, consumer preferences, technological novelty, appropriability, process innovation, customer-driven innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review