The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Product Development Decision‐Making Effectiveness: Comparing Individuals, Face‐To‐Face Teams, and Virtual Teams*
Abstract
A total of 411 subjects participated in two decision‐making experiments in order to examine the effectiveness of new product development project continuation decisions. Using escalation of commitment theory, in Study 1, individual versus face‐to‐face team decision‐making effectiveness was compared. Study 2, an extension of Study 1, compared the new product development decision‐making effectiveness of individuals, face‐to‐face teams, and virtual teams. A virtual team is a geographically and temporally dispersed and electronically communicating work group. In Study 2, the virtual teams communicated asynchronously via groupware technology. Our findings suggest that teams make more effective decisions than individuals, and virtual teams make the most effective decisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046408 · Cited by 4,819
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action
Staw, B. M. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2 · Cited by 2,061 · cited 1×
“…for initiating projects tend to remain committed to them (or fund them at higher levels) even when they are failing (compared to individuals who did not initiate the projects) (cf. Staw, 1976; Bazerman, Giulano, & Appelman, 1984; Brockner et al., 1986; Whyte, 1991; Boulding et al., 1997).”
BackgroundThe Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action
Staw, B. M. (1981) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1981.4285694 · Cited by 1,693
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
Cited by
Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here?
Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002 · Cited by 1,314
Enhancing Effectiveness on Virtual Teams: Understanding Why Traditional Team Skills Are Insufficient
Berry, G. R. (2011) · Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/0021943610397270 · Cited by 241
Aligning strategic human resource management and person–environment fit
Werbel, J. D., & DeMarie, S. M. (2005) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.10.001 · Cited by 152
Can You Hear Me Now? Communication in Virtual Product Development Teams*
Montoya, M. M., Massey, A. P., Hung, Y. C., & Crisp, C. B. (2009) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00342.x · Cited by 135
Self-citationCoenen, M., & Kok, R. A. W. (2014) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.003 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, J. B., Montoya‐Weiss, M. M., & Massey, A. P.
- Venue
- Decision Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 575-600
- ISSN
- 0011-7315 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5915
- OpenAlex
- W2125543222
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
