The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational Integration for Product Development: The Effects on Glitches, On‐Time Execution of Engineering Change Orders, and Market Success
Abstract
Deviations from requirements during the product development process can be considered as glitches. Fixing glitches, or problems, during the product development process consumes valuable resources, which may adversely affect product development time and hamper the firm's goal to pursue a first‐mover advantage. It is posited that an integrated organizational response can diminish incidences of glitches and improve the ability of the firm to respond to engineering changes, subsequently leading to improved market success. This organizational response frequently includes heavyweight product development managers who are seen as essential catalysts for internal integration. Though internal integration is vital, it is equally important to integrate with customers and suppliers alike because such network partners can provide access to information, knowledge, and unique and complementary resources that are otherwise unavailable to the firm. Findings, which are based on a sample of 191 product development projects in the automotive industry, suggest that some integration routines have a positive impact on product development outcomes and market success, while other routines can in fact hamper the collective effort.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Modern Methods for Business Research
(1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410604385 · Cited by 6,534
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach
Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001 · Cited by 3,310
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.2.136 · Cited by 2,672
CONDUCTING INTERORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH USING KEY INFORMANTS.
KUMAR, N., STERN, L. W., & ANDERSON, J. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256824 · Cited by 2,467
Cited by
Suurmond, R., van Rhee, H., & Hak, T. (2017) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1260 · Cited by 881
Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance
Lii, P., & Kuo, F.-I. (2016) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.01.018 · Cited by 284
Ralston, P. M., Blackhurst, J., Cantor, D. E., & Crum, M. R. (2015) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12064 · Cited by 254
Shashi, Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Ertz, M. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.011 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Koufteros, X. A., Rawski, G. E., & Rupak, R.
- Venue
- Decision Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-80
- ISSN
- 0011-7315 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5915
- OpenAlex
- W2002497567
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 16.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Integration for Product Development: The Effects on Glitches, On‐Time Execution of Engineering Change Orders, and Market Success. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00259.x
- The paper
- Koufteros, X. A., Rawski, G. E., & Rupak, R. (2010). Organizational Integration for Product Development: The Effects on Glitches, On‐Time Execution of Engineering Change Orders, and Market Success. Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00259.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
