The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pessimism, Computer Failure, and Information Systems Development in the Public Sector
Abstract
The majority of information systems developments are unsuccessful. The larger the development, the more likely it will be unsuccessful. Despite the persistence of this problem for decades and the expenditure of vast sums of money, computer failure has received surprisingly little attention in the public administration literature. This article outlines the problems of enthusiasm and the problems of control, as well as the overwhelming complexity, that make the failure of large developments almost inevitable. Rather than the positive view found in much of the public administration literature, the author suggests a pessimism when it comes to information systems development. Aims for information technology should be modest ones, and in many cases, the risks, uncertainties, and probability of failure mean that new investments in technology are not justified. The author argues for a public official as a recalcitrant, suspicious, and skeptical adopter of IT.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Since these issues were not products of tool design, timeliness, nor budget, but with end users' reluctance to use it, we can -with termi nology borrowed from the study of information system implementation -label the process a clear instance of ' user failure ' (Goldfinch, 2007).”
From Creating a workforce of fatigued cynics? A randomized controlled trial of implementing an algorithmic decision-making support tool (2024) · cites this paper as Goldfinch, 2007
Citations
Cites
The Science of “Muddling Through”
Lindblom, C. E. (1959) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/973677 · Cited by 8,513
A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392088 · Cited by 8,259
Social Theory and Social Structure.
Stone, G. P., & Merton, R. Κ. (1958) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2390803 · Cited by 4,520
The Unified Software Development Process
Jacobson, I., Booch, G., & Rumbaugh, J. E. (1999) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 3,389
Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach
Fenton, N., & Pfleeger, S. L. (2013) · Cited by 2,517
Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation
Kwon, T.-H., & Zmud, R. W. (1987) · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks · Cited by 1,463
The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success
Baccarini, D. (1999) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/875697289903000405 · Cited by 1,136
Rationalism in Politics, and Other Essays.
Franklin, J. H., & Oakeshott, M. (1963) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2023417 · Cited by 1,033
Institutional Perspectives on Political Institutions
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1996) · Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.1996.tb00242.x · Cited by 710
Advancing E-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare?
Norris, D. F., & Moon, M. J. (2005) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00431.x · Cited by 648
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Beetham David, 1996, Bureaucracy
- Bronson Po, 1999, The Nudist on the Late Shift and Other Tales of Silicon Valley
- Cole Andy, 1995, Runaway Projects: Cause and Effects, Software World (UK), 26, 3
- Evans Mark, 2001, Computerworld New Zealand, 43
- Heeks Richard, 2002, Failure, Success and Improvisation of Information System Projects in Developing Countries
- 10.4324/9780203204962 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203204962 · DOI
- Hewson N., 1998, ROI in Sales and Marketing Systems
- James Geoffrey, 1997, IT Fiascoes and How to Avoid Them, Datamation, 84
- Korac‐Boisvert N., 1995, Transcending Soft‐Core IT Disasters in Public Sector Organizations, Information Infrastructure and Policy, 4, 131
- Royal Academy of Engineering, 2004, The Challenges of Complex IT Projects
- SIMPL Group, 2000, Information Technology Projects: Performance of the New Zealand Public Sector in Performance
- Swanson E. Burton, 1988, Information System Implementation: Bridging the Gap between Design and Implementation
- Teega Associates, 2003, Automation Program Evaluation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smart city as urban innovation
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011) · International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance · doi:10.1145/2072069.2072100 · Cited by 791
Health IT Success and Failure: Recommendations from Literature and an AMIA Workshop
Kaplan, B., & Harris-Salamone, K. D. (2009) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2997 · Cited by 383
Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website
Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003 · Cited by 325
Habibzadeh, H., Nussbaum, B. H., Anjomshoa, F., Kantarcı, B., & Soyata, T. (2019) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101660 · Cited by 327
Do they want it? Do they use it? The ‘Demand-Side’ of e-Government in Australia and New Zealand
Gauld, R. D. C., Goldfinch, S. F., & Horsburgh, S. (2010) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.002 · Cited by 260
Self-citationLinking public sector social media and e-government website use to trust in government
Porumbescu, G. A. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.006 · Cited by 248
Reddick, C. G., & Turner, M. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.03.005 · Cited by 225
Doherty, N. F., Ashurst, C., & Peppard, J. (2011) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2011.8 · Cited by 176
TWO MYTHS OF CONVERGENCE IN PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REFORM
Goldfinch, S. F., & Wallis, J. L. (2010) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01848.x · Cited by 181
Self-citationWhy E-participation systems fail: The case of Estonia's Osale.ee
Toots, M. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.02.002 · Cited by 184
Conceptualizing E-Government from Local Government Perspectives
Manoharan, A., & Ingrams, A. R. (2018) · State and Local Government Review · doi:10.1177/0160323x18763964 · Cited by 140
Integrating ICT adoption issues into (e-)leadership theory
Wart, M. V., Roman, A. V., Wang, X., & Liu, C. (2016) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.11.003 · Cited by 136
Citizens’ attitudes toward Open Government and Government 2.0
Nam, T. (2012) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852312438783 · Cited by 141
Effects of information technology failures on the market value of firms
Bharadwaj, A. S., Keil, M., & Mähring, M. (2009) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2009.04.001 · Cited by 138
Knowledge vacuum: An organizational learning dynamic of how e-government innovations fail
Choi, T., & Chandler, S. M. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101416 · Cited by 135
Challenges of adopting agile methods in a public organization
Nuottila, J., Aaltonen, K., & Kujala, J. (2022) · International journal of information systems and project management · doi:10.12821/ijispm040304 · Cited by 96
Is Public Trust in Government Associated With Trust in E-Government?
Horsburgh, S., Goldfinch, S. F., & Gauld, R. D. C. (2011) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439310368130 · Cited by 104
Self-citationElectronic Participation Technologies and Perceived Outcomes for Local Government Managers
Feeney, M. K., & Welch, E. W. (2012) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.642628 · Cited by 83
Organizational blind spots: Splitting, blame and idealization in the National Health Service
Fotaki, M., & Hyde, P. (2014) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726714530012 · Cited by 85
Andersen, K. N., Medaglia, R., Vatrapu, R., Henriksen, H. Z., & Gauld, R. D. C. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.12.006 · Cited by 80
Peeters, R. (2020) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-200253 · Cited by 78
Using Information Technology to Improve the Quality and Safety of Emergency Care
Handel, D. A., Wears, R. L., Nathanson, L. A., & Pines, J. M. (2011) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01070.x · Cited by 74
Cognitive Biases in Governing: Technology Preferences in Election Administration
Moynihan, D. P., & Lavertu, S. (2011) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02478.x · Cited by 72
Project failureen masse: a study of loose budgetary control in ISD projects
Conboy, K. (2010) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.7 · Cited by 72
Understanding e-government failure in the developing country context: a process-oriented study
Gunawong, P., & Gao, P. (2017) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2016.1269713 · Cited by 80
The e-government paradox in post-Soviet countries
Knox, C., & Janenova, S. (2019) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-08-2018-0173 · Cited by 67
Sharma, R., & Arya, R. K. (2022) · Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · doi:10.1002/ett.4571 · Cited by 69
Is Your Project Turning into a Black Hole?
Keil, M., & Mähring, M. (2010) · California Management Review · doi:10.1525/cmr.2010.53.1.6 · Cited by 67
What Public Servants Really Think of E-Government
Baldwin, J. N., Gauld, R. D. C., & Goldfinch, S. F. (2011) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.589616 · Cited by 66
Self-citationA survey on the characteristics of projects with success in delivering client benefits
Jørgensen, M. (2016) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2016.05.008 · Cited by 64
What should we measure? Conceptualizing usage in health information exchange
Vest, J. R., & Jasperson, J. (2010) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2009.000471 · Cited by 56
Globalization and Worldwide Best Practices in E-Government
Manoharan, A., Ingrams, A. R., Kang, D., & Zhao, H. (2020) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2020.1729182 · Cited by 55
Mosweu, O., Bwalya, K. J., & Mutshewa, A. (2016) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666916640593 · Cited by 54
Digital Social Policy: Past, Present, Future
Henman, P. W. F. (2022) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279422000162 · Cited by 61
Mosweu, O., Bwalya, K. J., & Mutshewa, A. (2016) · Records Management Journal · doi:10.1108/rmj-03-2015-0012 · Cited by 55
Study on e-government services quality: The integration of online and offline services
Fan, J., & Yang, W. (2015) · Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management · doi:10.3926/jiem.1405 · Cited by 57
Apriliyanti, I. D., Kusumasari, B., Pramusinto, A., & Setianto, W. A. (2020) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-05-2020-0158 · Cited by 71
Seri, P., & Zanfei, A. (2013) · Structural Change and Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2013.07.003 · Cited by 55
Kempeneer, S., & Heylen, F. (2023) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517231160528 · Cited by 67
Governing innovation in U.S. state government: An ecosystem perspective
Dawson, G. S., Denford, J. S., & Desouza, K. C. (2016) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2016.08.003 · Cited by 53
Sarantis, D., Smithson, S., Charalabidis, Y. K., & Askounis, D. (2009) · Systemic Practice and Action Research · doi:10.1007/s11213-009-9161-9 · Cited by 49
Mishra, A., Das, S. R., & Murray, J. J. (2015) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12513 · Cited by 43
Cybersecurity Threats in Local Government: A Sociotechnical Perspective
Frandell, A., & Feeney, M. K. (2022) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/02750740221125432 · Cited by 56
Leading the Implementation of ICT Innovations
Hansen, M. B., & Nørup, I. (2017) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12807 · Cited by 42
Trust, Risk, Privacy and Security in e-Government Use: Insights from a MASEM Analysis
Gupta, P., Hooda, A., Jeyaraj, A., Seddon, J. J. M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-024-10497-8 · Cited by 95
THE INFLUENCE OF E‐GOVERNMENT ON ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION: THE CASE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN EGYPT
Reddick, C. G., AbdelSalam, H. M. E.-S., & ElKadi, H. A. (2011) · Public Administration and Development · doi:10.1002/pad.615 · Cited by 40
IT portfolio decision-making in local governments: Rationality, politics, intuition and coincidences
Nielsen, J. A., & Pedersen, K. (2014) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.04.002 · Cited by 43
New Ends, New Means, but Old Attitudes: Citizens' Views on Open Government and Government 2.0
Nam, T. (2011) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2011.316 · Cited by 39
Translation of Real-Time Infectious Disease Modeling into Routine Public Health Practice
Muscatello, D. J., Chughtai, A. A., Heywood, A. E., Gardner, L., Heslop, D. J., & MacIntyre, C. R. (2017) · Emerging infectious diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2305.161720 · Cited by 39
Kempeneer, S. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101578 · Cited by 48
The future of health IT innovation and informatics: a report from AMIA's 2010 policy meeting
McGowan, J. J., Cusack, C. M., & Bloomrosen, M. (2011) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000522 · Cited by 35
A Systematic Review of Implementation Challenges in Public E-Procurement
Mohungoo, I., Brown, I., & Kabanda, S. K. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-45002-1_5 · Cited by 52
Revisiting the IT Productivity Paradox
Brown, M. M. (2014) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074014523102 · Cited by 35
A Chronicling System for Children's Social Work: Learning from the ICS Failure
Ince, D. C., & Griffiths, A. (2011) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr016 · Cited by 34
Digitalization of swedish government agencies
Borg, M., Olsson, T., Franke, U., & Assar, S. (2018) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS) · doi:10.1145/3183428.3183434 · Cited by 34
The Uses and Impacts of Mobile Computing Technology in Hot Spots Policing
Koper, C. S., Lum, C., & Hibdon, J. (2015) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x16634482 · Cited by 30
Dekker, R., Koot, P., Birbil, Ş. İ., & Andres, M. V. E. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221087855 · Cited by 29
Nyame-Asiamah, F. (2020) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2019.1650326 · Cited by 28
Damoah, I. S., Ayakwah, A., Aryee, K. J., & Twum, P. (2020) · International Journal of Construction Management · doi:10.1080/15623599.2020.1763897 · Cited by 27
Hospital Information Systems User Needs Analysis: A Vendor Survey
Farzandipour, M., Sadoughi, F., & Meidani, Z. (2011) · Journal of health informatics in developing countries · Cited by 27
ICT, E-Government and E-Governance: Bits & Bytes for Public Administration
Homburg, V. M. F. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_18 · Cited by 27
Choudrie, J., Zamani, E. D., Umeoji, E., & Emmanuel, A. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.004 · Cited by 31
New Questions for E-Government
Roman, A. V., & Miller, H. T. (2013) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/jegr.2013010104 · Cited by 26
Frisk, J. E., Bannister, F., & Lindgren, R. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2014.9 · Cited by 26
Ni, A. Y., & Chen, Y. (2016) · Journal of Public Affairs Education · doi:10.1080/15236803.2016.12002241 · Cited by 26
Revillod, G. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02216-x · Cited by 35
Aarts, J. (2012) · Health Policy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2012.01.008 · Cited by 26
Price, C., Green, W., & Suhomlinova, O. O. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocy162 · Cited by 25
Government ICT project failure factors: project stakeholders’ views
Nawi, H. S. A., Rahman, A. A., & Ibrahim, O. (2012) · Cited by 25
Rahman, A. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1069-096420150000023003 · Cited by 28
End User Satisfaction and Individual Performance Assessments in e-Procurement Systems
Sharabati, M. (2014) · International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering · doi:10.7763/ijcte.2015.v7.1010 · Cited by 24
Intra-organizational information asymmetry in offshore ISD outsourcing
Nuwangi, S. M., Sedera, D., Srivastava, S. C., & Murphy, G. D. (2014) · VINE · doi:10.1108/vine-04-2013-0023 · Cited by 24
Organization’s Quality Maturity as a Vehicle for EHR Success
Meidani, Z., Sadoughi, F., Maleki, M. R., Tofighi, S., & Marani, A. B. (2010) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9584-y · Cited by 24
Secure transmission technique for data in IoT edge computing infrastructure
Sharma, R., & Arya, R. K. (2021) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00576-7 · Cited by 23
Framing the Questions of E-Government Ethics
Roman, A. V. (2013) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074013485809 · Cited by 24
Empirical evaluation of a technology acceptance model for mobile policing
Lindsay, R., Jackson, T., & Cooke, L. (2013) · Police Practice and Research · doi:10.1080/15614263.2013.829602 · Cited by 23
Change management in information systems projects for public organizations
Ziemba, E. W., & Obłąk, I. (2015) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management · doi:10.28945/2185 · Cited by 23
Change Management in Information Systems Projects for Public Organizations in Poland
Ziemba, E. W. (2015) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management · Cited by 22
Information and communications technology use, e-government, pain and stress amongst public servants
Goldfinch, S. F., Gauld, R. D. C., & Baldwin, N. (2011) · New Technology Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-005x.2010.00256.x · Cited by 21
Self-citationA techno-cultural emergence perspective on the management of techno-change
Jackson, S., & Philip, G. (2010) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.01.008 · Cited by 21
Success and Failure of Local E-Government Projects
AbdelSalam, H. M. E.-S., Reddick, C. G., & Kadi, H. A. E. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0086-7.ch010 · Cited by 20
Evaluating e-government systems in Turkey: The case of the 'e-movable system'
Sebetçi, Ö., & Aksu, G. (2014) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-140341 · Cited by 20
How Can Agile Methodologies Be Used to Enhance the Success of Information Technology Projects?
Truong, D., & Jitbaipoon, T. (2016) · International Journal of Information Technology Project Management · doi:10.4018/ijitpm.2016040101 · Cited by 19
Information Technology and Organizational Morphology: The Case of the Korean Central Government
Im, T. (2011) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02227.x · Cited by 19
Sørum, H. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22961-9_10 · Cited by 18
e‐Government in the Irish Revenue: The Revenue On‐Line Service (ROS): A Success Story?
Robbins, G., Mulligan, E., & Keenan, F. (2015) · Financial Accountability and Management · doi:10.1111/faam.12061 · Cited by 18
Information systems development project performance in the 21st century
Wright, M. K., & Capps, C. J. (2010) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/1734103.1734121 · Cited by 18
Setback and remedy of local e-government projects
AbdelSalam, H. M. E.-S., ElKadi, H. A., & Gamal, S. (2010) · International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance · doi:10.1145/1930321.1930336 · Cited by 18
Useful recommendations for successful implementation of programming courses
Binas, M., & Pietriková, E. (2014) · International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA) · doi:10.1109/iceta.2014.7107618 · Cited by 17
Technophilia, neo‐Luddism, eDependency and the judgement of Thamus
Coulthard, D., & Keller, S. (2012) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/14779961211285881 · Cited by 17
Exploring legitimacy in major public procurement projects
Russell, C., & Meehan, J. (2014) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-14-04-2014-b003 · Cited by 20
Three paths for learning analytics and beyond: moving from rhetoric to reality
Beer, C., Tickner, R., & Jones, D. J. (2014) · University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) · Cited by 17
Exploring the role of consulting in local government digital transformation
Machljankin, J., Neumann, O., Steiner, R., & Ege, J. (2024) · Public Money & Management · doi:10.1080/09540962.2024.2414060 · Cited by 16
Khan, A. Z., Mahmood, F., Bokhari, R. H., Mushtaq, R., & Raza, A. (2021) · Digital Policy Regulation and Governance · doi:10.1108/dprg-04-2021-0048 · Cited by 16
Tan, J. (2024) · Chinese Political Science Review · doi:10.1007/s41111-024-00262-2 · Cited by 16
Dennehy, D., Pappas, I. O., Wamba, S. F., & Michael, K. (2021) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-10-2021-871 · Cited by 16
Fusi, F., Jung, H., & Welch, E. W. (2023) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2250362 · Cited by 15
Leading successful government-academia collaborations using FLOSS and agile values
Wen, M., Siqueira, R., Lago, N. P., Camarinha, D., Terceiro, A. S. D. A., Kon, F., & Meirelles, P. (2020) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2020.110548 · Cited by 16
Benefits management and agile practices in software projects: how perceived benefits are impacted
Holgeid, K. K., & Jørgensen, M. (2020) · IEEE Conference on Business Informatics · doi:10.1109/cbi49978.2020.10057 · Cited by 15
To monitor or intervene? City managers and the implementation of strategic initiatives
Mitchell, D. A. (2017) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12381 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldfinch, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Goldfinch, Shaun
- ORCID
- Goldfinch, Shaun
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 917-929
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W1966931213
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 49.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Administration Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- information system development, public sector IT, project failure, computer system failures, pessimism, enthusiasm, control, complexity, risk and uncertainty, IT investment, public officials, technology adoption, information technology in public administration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review