The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overconfidence, Compensation Contracts, and Capital Budgeting
Abstract
A risk‐averse manager's overconfidence makes him less conservative. As a result, it is cheaper for firms to motivate him to pursue valuable risky projects. When compensation endogenously adjusts to reflect outside opportunities, moderate levels of overconfidence lead firms to offer the manager flatter compensation contracts that make him better off. Overconfident managers are also more attractive to firms than their rational counterparts because overconfidence commits them to exert effort to learn about projects. Still, too much overconfidence is detrimental to the manager since it leads him to accept highly convex compensation contracts that expose him to excessive risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491
Moral Hazard and Observability
Holmstrom, B. (1979) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003320 · Cited by 8,311
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814 · cited 1×
“Taylor and Brown (1988) argue that moderate degrees of overconfidence and other self-serving biases are consistent with good mental health.”
BackgroundInvestor Psychology and Security Market Under‐ and Overreactions
Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1998) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00077 · Cited by 5,682
The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem.
Ross, S. A. (1973) · American Economic Review · Cited by 4,269
Outside directors and CEO turnover
Weisbach, M. S. (1988) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(88)90053-0 · Cited by 4,234
The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers
Roll, R. (1986) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/296325 · Cited by 3,751
CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment
MALMENDIER, U., & TATE, G. (2005) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00813.x · Cited by 3,669
Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction☆
MALMENDIER, U., & TATE, G. (2008) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.07.002 · Cited by 2,754
Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing
(2001) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00379 · Cited by 2,357
Cited by
Are Overconfident CEOs Better Innovators?
HIRSHLEIFER, D., LOW, A., & TEOH, S. H. (2012) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01753.x · Cited by 1,765
Narcissism and the art market performance
Zhou, Y. (2017) · The European Journal of Finance · doi:10.1080/1351847x.2016.1151804 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- GERVAIS, S., HEATON, J. B., & ODEAN, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-09-21
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1735-1777
- ISSN
- 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6261
- OpenAlex
- W2115464651
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 49.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overconfidence, Compensation Contracts, and Capital Budgeting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01686.x
- The paper
- GERVAIS, S., HEATON, J. B., & ODEAN, T. (2011). Overconfidence, Compensation Contracts, and Capital Budgeting. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01686.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.