Toward a Dynamic Learning Perspective of Entrepreneurship
Abstract
This conceptual article introduces a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship that builds upon existing “dominant” theoretical approaches to understanding entrepreneurial activity. As many aspects of entrepreneurial learning remain poorly understood, this article maps out and extends current boundaries of thinking regarding how entrepreneurs learn. It presents key conclusions from emergent empirical and conceptual work on the subject and synthesizes a broad range of contributory adult, management, and individual learning literature to develop a robust and integrated thematic conceptualization of entrepreneurial learning. Three distinctive, interrelated elements of entrepreneurial learning are proposed—dynamic temporal phases, interrelated processes, and overarching characteristics. The article concludes by demonstrating how a “learning lens” can be applied to create further avenues for research in entrepreneurship from a learning perspective.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many entrepreneurs develop crucial skills through hands-on experience and subsequent reskilling rather than at the outset of their careers.
“research indicates that many entrepreneurs develop crucial skills, not at the outset of their careers, but rather through hands-on experience and subsequent reskilling (e.g., Cope 2005, Kozlinska et al. 2023).”
From Skill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment (2025) · cites this paper as Cope 2005
Cites
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ritz, W., Wolf, M., & McQuitty, S. (2019) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-04-2018-0062 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Fisher, G., Stevenson, R., Neubert, E., Burnell, D., & Kuratko, D. F. (2020) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12584 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Impact of Entrepreneurship Training on Entrepreneurial Efficacy and Alertness among Adolescent Youth
Ho, M.-H. R., Uy, M. A., Kang, B. N. Y., & Chan, K.-Y. (2018) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00013 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
“Entrepreneurship training is a structured program that aims to equip participants with the necessary skillset and mindset for identifying and launching new business ventures (Cope, 2005; Katz, 2007).”
BackgroundSkill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment
Guo, X., Cheng, Z. (., & Pavlou, P. A. (2025) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2022.0307 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cope, J.
- Affiliations
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cope, Jason
- Venue
- Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 373-397
- ISSN
- 1042-2587 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6520
- OpenAlex
- W2051842037
- Cited by
- 1,305
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 104 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 44
- FWCI
- 33.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Keywords
- entrepreneurial learning, entrepreneurial activity, adult learning, managerial learning, individual learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review