Cited by 220Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac Health and Mental Health

Sometimes higher heart rate variability is not better heart rate variability: results of graphical and nonlinear analyses.

Open access
STEIN, PHYLLIS K., DOMITROVICH, PETER P., HUI, NELSON, RAUTAHARJU, PENTTI, GOTTDIENER, JOHN·2005·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence and effect on traditional heart rate variability (HRV) indices of abnormal HRV patterns in the elderly. Methods: Hourly Poincaré plots and plots of spectral HRV from normal‐to‐normal interbeat intervals and hourly nonlinear HRV values were examined in a subset of 290 consecutive participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Only subjects in normal sinus rhythm with ≥18 hours of usable data were included. Eligible subjects were 71 ± 5 years. During 7 years of follow‐up, 21.7% had died. Hours were scored as normal (0), borderline (0.5), or abnormal (1) from a combination of plot appearance and HRV. Summed scores were normalized to 100% to create an abnormality score (ABN). Short‐term HRV versus each 5th percentile of ABN was plotted and a cutpoint for markedly increased HRV identified. The t ‐tests compared HRV for subjects above and below this cutpoint. Cox regression evaluated the association of ABN and mortality. Results: Of 5,815 eligible hourly plots, 64.4% were normal, 14.5% borderline, and 21.1% abnormal. HR, SDNN, SDNNIDX, ln VLF and LF power, and power law slope did not differ by the cutpoint for increased short‐term HRV, while SDANN and ln ULF power were significantly lower for those above the cutpoint. However, many HRV indices including LF/HF ratio and normalized LF and HF power were significantly different between groups (P < 0.001). Increased ABN was significantly associated with mortality (P = 0.019). Despite similar values for many HRV indices, being in the group above the cutpoint was significantly associated with mortality (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Abnormal HR patterns that elevate many HRV indices are prevalent among the elderly and associated with higher risk of mortality. Consideration of abnormal HRV may improve HRV‐based risk stratification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.40788.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are exceptions to the general rule that higher resting vagal tone is beneficial, for example when a higher resting vagal tone level is observed in eating disorders such as bulimia nervosa.

    “There are some exceptions to this general rule (e.g., Stein et al., 2005; Peschel et al., 2016), for example when a higher resting vagal tone level is observed in the case of eating disorders such as bulimia nervosa (Peschel et al., 2016), which may be due to decreased resting metabolic rate originating from limited calorie intake (Martin et al., 2007).”

    From Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research – Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting (2017) · cites this paper as Stein et al., 2005

    The Introduction and Discussion support Stein et al. as an example of why higher HRV is not always better: elevated HRV indices can reflect erratic rhythm rather than better autonomic function. The paper does not establish that higher resting vagal tone itself is harmful; the bulimia example is separately attributed to Peschel et al. in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
STEIN, P. K., DOMITROVICH, P. P., HUI, N., RAUTAHARJU, P., & GOTTDIENER, J.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
STEIN, PHYLLIS K.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-31
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
954-959
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W2118573445
Cited by
220
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc085082-026, n01hc085081-021, n01hc085079-024, n01hc015103-009, n01hc085084-005, n01hc085085-011, n01hc085083-027, n01hc085080-026, n01hc085086-022, n01hc035129-010)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC-85081, N01HC85085, N01HC-85083, N01HC15103, N01HC85082, N01 HC85086, N01HC85080, R01 HL62181, R01HL062181, N01-HC85079, ­N01-HC85084, N01HC35129)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
heart rate variability, Poincaré plot, nonlinear HRV analysis, older adults, mortality risk, cardiovascular risk stratification, power-law slope, autonomic function
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Arrhythmia, Sinus, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Models, Cardiovascular, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Proportional Hazards Models, Nonlinear Dynamics, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review