Cited by 27Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Age-specific associations between cardiac vagal activity and functional somatic symptoms: a population-based study

Open access
Tak, Lineke M., Janssens, Karin A.M., Dietrich, Andrea, Slaets, Joris P.J., Rosmalen, Judith G.M.·2010·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional somatic symptoms (FSS) are symptoms not explained by underlying organic pathology. It has frequently been suggested that dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) contributes to the development of FSS. We hypothesized that decreased cardiac vagal activity is cross-sectionally and prospectively associated with the number of FSS in the general population. METHODS: This study was performed in a population-based cohort of 774 adults (45.1% male, mean age +/- SD 53.5 +/- 10.7 years). Participants completed the somatization section of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview surveying the presence of 43 FSS. ANS function was assessed by spectral analysis of heart rate variability in the high-frequency band (HRV-HF), reflecting cardiac vagal activity. Follow-up measurements of HRV-HF and FSS were performed approximately 2 years later. RESULTS: Linear regression analyses, with adjustments for gender, age, body mass index, anxiety, depression, smoking, alcohol use, and frequency of exercise, revealed an interaction of cardiac vagal activity with age: HRV-HF was negatively associated with FSS in adults 52 years (beta = 0.13, t = 2.51, p = 0.012). Longitudinal analysis demonstrated a similar pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased cardiac vagal activity is associated with a higher number of FSS in adults aged 52 years needs further exploration. The role of age should be acknowledged in future studies on ANS function in the etiology of FSS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000296136

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Fava GA, Sonino N: Psychosomatic assess- ment. Psychother Psychosom 2009; 78: 333- 341.
  2. Lucini D, Di Fede G, Parati G, Pagani M: Im- pact of chronic psychosocial stress on auto- nomic cardiovascular regulation in other- wise healthy subjects. Hypertension 2005; 46: 1201-1206.
  3. Sharpe M, Bass C: Pathophysiological mech- anisms in somatization. Int Rev Psychiatry 1992; 4: 81-97.
  4. De Meersman RE, Stein PK: Vagal modula- tion and aging. Biol Psychol 2007; 74: 165- 173.
  5. Ghione S: Hypertension-associated hypalge- sia. Evidence in experimental animals and humans, pathophysiological mechanisms, and potential clinical consequences. Hyper- tension 1996; 28: 494-504.
  6. Virtanen R, Jula A, Huikuri H, Kuusela T, Helenius H, Ylitalo A, Voipio-Pulkki LM, Kauma H, Kesaniemi YA, Airaksinen J: In- creased pulse pressure is associated with re- duced baroreflex sensitivity. J Hum Hyper- tens 2004; 18: 247-252.
  7. Denver JW, Reed SF, Porges SW: Method- ological issues in the quantification of respi- ratory sinus arrhythmia. Biol Psychol 2007; 74: 286-294.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tak, L. M., Janssens, K. A. M., Dietrich, A., Slaets, J. P. J., & Rosmalen, J. G. M.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2010
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
179-187
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2104991730
Cited by
27
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
functional somatic symptoms, cardiac vagal activity, heart rate variability, high-frequency HRV, autonomic dysfunction, age differences, somatization, aging
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Arousal, Blood Pressure, Cross-Sectional Studies, Electroencephalography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fourier Analysis, Heart, Heart Rate, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Prospective Studies, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Somatoform Disorders, Vagus Nerve, Cohort Studies, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review