Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reversal of Left Ventricular Dysfunction Following Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

GENTLESK, PHILIP J., SAUER, WILLIAM H., GERSTENFELD, EDWARD P., LIN, DAVID, DIXIT, SANJAY, PA‐C, ERICA ZADO, CALLANS, DAVID, MARCHLINSKI, FRANCIS E.·2007·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of ventricular rate control in atrial fibrillation (AF) can be difficult, and the presence of an AF‐induced ventricular cardiomyopathy due to intermittent poor rate control or other causes may be underestimated. The outcome with AF ablation in patients with a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may provide insight into this important clinical issue. Objective: To determine the effect of pulmonary vein isolation on LVEF in patients with AF and decreased LVEF (≤50%). Methods: Ablation consisted of proximal isolation of arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins (PVs) and elimination of non‐PV triggers. LVEF was determined within 24 hours after ablation and again at up to 6 months follow‐up. Transtelephonic monitoring was performed routinely for 2–3 weeks prior to ablation, at 6 weeks, and 6 months post and with symptoms following ablation. AF control was defined as freedom from AF or marked (>90%) reduction in AF burden on or off previously ineffective antiarrhythmic medication. Results: AF ablation was performed in 366 patients and 67 (18%) patients had decreased LV function with a mean LVEF of 42 ± 9%. An average of 3.4 ± 0.9 PVs were isolated. AF control in the depressed LVEF group compared favorably with the normal EF group (86% vs. 87% P = NS), although more redo procedures were required (1.6 ± 0.8 vs 1.3 ± 0.6 procedures; P ≤ 0.05). Only 15 of 67 patients (22%) with decreased LVEF had shown tachycardia (>100 bpm) on repeated preablation ECG recordings during AF. In the decreased LVEF group, the LVEF increased from 42 ± 9% to 56 ± 8% (P < 0.001) after ablation. Conclusions: Patients with AF and decreased LVEF undergoing AF ablation have similar success to patients with normal LVEF and have improvement in LVEF after ablation. These results suggest the presence of a reversible AF‐induced ventricular cardiomyopathy in many patients with AF and depressed LV function. The presence of under‐recognized and reversible cardiomyopathy even when tachycardia is not persistent is important to recognize.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00653.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
GENTLESK, P. J., SAUER, W. H., GERSTENFELD, E. P., LIN, D., DIXIT, S., PA‐C, E. Z., CALLANS, D., & MARCHLINSKI, F. E.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
9-14
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W1995961708
Cited by
276
References
30
FWCI
12.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reversal of Left Ventricular Dysfunction Following Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00653.x
The paper
GENTLESK, P. J., SAUER, W. H., GERSTENFELD, E. P., LIN, D., DIXIT, S., PA‐C, E. Z., CALLANS, D., & MARCHLINSKI, F. E. (2007). Reversal of Left Ventricular Dysfunction Following Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00653.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.