The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators versus Quarterly Device Interrogations in Clinic: Results from a Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial
Abstract
ICD: Remote Monitoring Versus Clinic Interrogations. Introduction:Remote monitoring is increasingly becoming the new standard of care for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) follow‐up. We sought to determine whether remote monitoring of ICDs improves patient outcomes compared with quarterly device interrogations in clinic. Methods and Results:In this single‐center pilot clinical trial, adult patients with an ICD were randomly assigned to remote monitoring versus quarterly device interrogations in clinic. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular hospitalization, emergency room visit for a cardiac cause, and unscheduled visit to the electrophysiology clinic for a device‐related issue at 1 year. We also examined health‐related quality of life, costs, and patient satisfaction with their ICD care. Of 151 patients enrolled in this trial, 76 were randomized to remote monitoring and 75 to quarterly device interrogations in clinic. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint (32% in the remote monitoring arm vs 34% in the control arm; P = 0.8), mortality, or cost between the 2 arms. Quality of life and patient satisfaction were significantly better in the control arm than in the remote monitoring arm at 6 months (83 [25th, 75th percentiles 70, 90] vs 75 [50, 85]; P = 0.002 and 88 [75, 100] vs 75 [75, 88]; P = 0.03, respectively), but not at 12 months. Conclusion:We showed no significant reduction in cardiac‐related resource utilization with remote monitoring of ICDs. However, given the small number of patients in our study, the real clinical and health economics impact of remote monitoring needs to be verified by a large, multicenter, randomized clinical trial.(J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 545‐550, May 2010)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Data on the cost benefits of remote monitoring are not definitive to date.52,56”
From Managing with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (2013) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cites
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
(1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195108248.001.0001 · Cited by 7,193
Moss, A. J., Zaręba, W., Hall, W. J., Klein, H., Wilber, D. J., Cannom, D. S., Daubert, J. P., Higgins, S. L., Brown, M. W., & Andrews, M. L. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa013474 · Cited by 6,885
Amiodarone or an Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator for Congestive Heart Failure
Bardy, G. H., Lee, K. L., Mark, D. B., Poole, J. E., Packer, D. L., Boineau, R., Domanski, M., Troutman, C., Anderson, J., Johnson, G., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043399 · Cited by 6,552
Self-citationThe Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure
Cleland, J. G. F., Daubert, J., Erdmann, E., Freemantle, N., Gras, D., KAPPENBERGER, L. J., & Tavazzi, L. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa050496 · Cited by 6,300
Bristow, M. R., Saxon, L. A., Boehmer, J., Krueger, S., Kass, D. A., De Marco, T., Carson, P., DiCarlo, L., DeMets, D., White, B. G., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032423 · Cited by 5,812
Prophylactic Defibrillator Implantation in Patients with Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Kadish, A. H., Dyer, A. R., Daubert, J. P., Quigg, R. J., Estes, N. A. M., Anderson, K. P., Calkins, H. G., Hoch, D., Goldberger, J. J., Shalaby, A. A., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa033088 · Cited by 2,078
Oss, J. M., Areba, W. O. Z., Ackson, W. J., Lein, H. E. K., Ilber, D. A. J. W., Annom, D. A. S. C., Ames, J. M., Aubert, P., Iggins, S. T. L. H., Rown, M. A. W. B., et al. (2002) · Cited by 2,026
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities
Epstein, A. E., Dimarco, J., Ellenbogen, K. A., Estes, N. A. M., Freedman, R. A., Gettes, L. S., Gillinov, A. M., Gregoratos, G., Hammill, S. C., Hayes, D. L., et al. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circualtionaha.108.189742 · Cited by 1,772
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities
Epstein, A. E., Dimarco, J., Ellenbogen, K. A., Estes, N. A. M., Freedman, R. A., Gettes, L. S., Gillinov, A. M., Gregoratos, G., Hammill, S. C., Hayes, D. L., et al. (2008) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.04.014 · Cited by 550
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.051 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01175.x · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
Flodgren, G., Rachas, A., Farmer, A. J., Inzitari, M., & Shepperd, S. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002098.pub2 · Cited by 806
Slotwiner, D. J., Varma, N., Akar, J. G., Annas, G. J., Beardsall, M., Fogel, R. I., Galizio, N. O., Glotzer, T. V., Leahy, R. A., Love, C. J., et al. (2015) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.008 · Cited by 533
“10,11 These systems use a wand-based radiofrequency platform to transfer data between the patient ’ s device and a transceiver.”
MethodRemote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
Parthiban, N., Esterman, A., Mahajan, R., Twomey, D. J., Pathak, R. K., Lau, D. H., Roberts‐Thomson, K. C., Young, G. D., Sanders, P., & Ganesan, A. N. (2015) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.029 · Cited by 247
“, 2010 (15) Single $18 yrs of age, have an ICD with or without CRT for an approved indication, devices followed-up at center, must have a telephone (land line) Patient-initiated transmissions every 3 months plus IO visit at 12 months IO visit every 3 months”
BackgroundBoriani, G., Costa, A. D., Quesada, A., Ricci, R. P., Favale, S., Boscolo, G., Clémenty, N., Amori, V., Stefano, L. M. D. S., & Burri, H. (2016) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.626 · Cited by 213
“Results related to costs for healthcare resource utilization are variable: Fauchier, 25 Raatikainen, 23 Zanaboni, 24 and Guédon-Moreau 26 reported or assumed savings (due to reduced visits or hospitalizations, and/or reimbursed transports), whereas Al-Khatib, 27 Burri, 28 and Heidbuchel 22 did not.”
Shameer, K., Badgeley, M. A., Miotto, R., Glicksberg, B. S., Morgan, J. W., & Dudley, J. T. (2017) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbv118 · Cited by 198
Pandor, A., Thokala, P., Gomersall, T., Baalbaki, H., Stevens, J., Wang, J., Wong, R., Brennan, A., & Fitzgerald, P. (2013) · Health Technol Assess · doi:10.3310/hta17320 · Cited by 159
Klersy, C., Boriani, G., De Silvestri, A., Mairesse, G. H., Braunschweig, F., Scotti, V., Balduini, A., Cowie, M. R., Leyva, F., & for the Health Economics Committee of the European Heart Rhythm Association (2016) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.470 · Cited by 120
Heidbüchel, H., Hindricks, G., Broadhurst, P., van Erven, L., Lozano, I. F., Rivero‐Ayerza, M., MALINOWSKI, K., Marek, A., Garrido, R. R., Löscher, S., et al. (2014) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu339 · Cited by 115
“Prior trials have shown that such FU is non-inferior clinically from a major events perspective, and even has clinical advantages like earlier actionability on clinical- or device-related findings, fewer and shorter hospitalizations, fewer inappropriate shocks, longer battery longevity, and even lower mortality.(1,6,7…”
BackgroundTelemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit?
Varma, N., & Ricci, R. P. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs388 · Cited by 102
“Some reported no difference in quality of life and patient satisfaction when compared with conventional follow-up strategy.(8,18) Others demonstrated high patient satisfaction rate, ease of use, and compliance with remote monitoring systems, even when manual data transmission with non-wireless devices was requested.”
BackgroundRemote Monitoring Alert Burden
O’Shea, C., Middeldorp, M. E., Hendriks, J., Brooks, A. G., Lau, D. H., Emami, M., Mishima, R. S., Thiyagarajah, A., Feigofsky, S. A., Gopinathannair, R., et al. (2020) · JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.029 · Cited by 82
Zanaboni, P., Landolina, M., Marzegalli, M., Lunati, M., Perego, G. B., Guenzati, G., Curnis, A., Valsecchi, S., Borghetti, F., Borghi, G., et al. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2587 · Cited by 76
“In the countries where a reimbursement for remote follow-ups is recognized, this is in-line with that of in-office visits [15,18,19].”
EHDViz: clinical dashboard development using open-source technologies
Badgeley, M. A., Shameer, K., Glicksberg, B. S., Tomlinson, M., Levin, M. A., McCormick, P. J., Kasarskis, A., Reich, D. L., & Dudley, J. T. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010579 · Cited by 69
Socio-economic effects and cost saving potential of remote patient monitoring (SAVE-HM trial)
Perl, S., Stiegler, P., Rotman, B., Prenner, G., Lercher, P., Anelli-Monti, M., Sereinigg, M., Riegelnik, V., Kvas, E., Kos, C., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.10.019 · Cited by 65
“However, strategies for cost reduction without loss of safety for patients are mandatory in order to sustain the health care system and guarantee proper treatment of all patients [29].”
BackgroundLeo, D. G., Buckley, B. J. R., Chowdhury, M., Harrison, S. L., Isanejad, M., Lip, G. Y. H., Wright, D. J., Lane, D. A., & the TAILOR investigators (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/35508 · Cited by 62
Svennberg, E., Caiani, E. G., Bruining, N., Desteghe, L., Han, J. K., Narayan, S. M., Rademakers, F. E., Sanders, P., & Duncker, D. (2023) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/euad176 · Cited by 66
Patient satisfaction and suggestions for improvement of remote ICD monitoring
Petersen, H. H., Larsen, M. C. J., Nielsen, O. W., Kensing, F., & Svendsen, J. H. (2012) · Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology · doi:10.1007/s10840-012-9675-4 · Cited by 57
Yee, R., Verma, A., Beardsall, M., Fraser, J. A., Philippon, F., & Exner, D. V. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.036 · Cited by 54
Timmermans, I., Meine, M., Szendey, I., Aring, J., Roldán, J. R., van Erven, L., Kahlert, P., Zitron, E., Mabo, P., Denollet, J., et al. (2018) · Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/pace.13574 · Cited by 53
“009), but received fewer hospital consultations (5 [3-9] vs 7 [5-10]; P = 0.”
BackgroundRemote monitoring and telemedicine in heart failure: implementation and benefits
Imberti, J. F., Tosetti, A., Mei, D. A., Maisano, A., & Boriani, G. (2021) · Current Cardiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11886-021-01487-2 · Cited by 53
Calò, L., Gargaro, A., Ruvo, E. D., Palozzi, G., Sciarra, L., Rebecchi, M., Guarracini, F., Fagagnini, A., Piroli, E., Lioy, E., et al. (2013) · Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology · doi:10.1007/s10840-013-9783-9 · Cited by 47
“However, up to the present, few studies have evaluated the economic impact of remote ICD management compared with conventional periodic in-hospital follow-up [12–15].”
BackgroundRemote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED)
Zeitler, E. P., & Piccini, J. P. (2016) · Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2016.03.012 · Cited by 46
Self-citationPerformance of first pacemaker to use smart device app for remote monitoring
Tarakji, K. G., Zaidi, A. M., ZWEIBEL, S. L., Varma, N., Sears, S. F., Allred, J. D., Roberts, P. R., Shaik, N. A., Silverstein, J. R., Maher, A. R., et al. (2021) · Heart Rhythm O2 · doi:10.1016/j.hroo.2021.07.008 · Cited by 42
Compliance with Remote Monitoring of ICDS/CRTDS in a Real‐World Population
Rosenfeld, L. E., Patel, A. S., Ajmani, V. B., Holbrook, R., & BRAND, T. A. (2014) · Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/pace.12358 · Cited by 40
Skov, M. B., Johansen, P. G., Skov, C. S., & Lauberg, A. (2015) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702192 · Cited by 40
VOGTMANN, T., Stiller, S., Marek, A., Kespohl, S., Gomer, M., Kühlkamp, V., Zach, G., Löscher, S., & Baumann, G. (2012) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eus252 · Cited by 39
Versteeg, H., Timmermans, I., Widdershoven, J. W. M. G., KIMMAN, G. P., Prévôt, S., Rauwolf, T., SCHOLTEN, M. F., Zitron, E., Mabo, P., Denollet, J., et al. (2019) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/euz140 · Cited by 38
Alotaibi, S. R., Hernández-Montfort, J., Ali, O. E., Chilali, K. E., & Perez-Villa, B. (2020) · Heart Failure Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10741-020-09923-1 · Cited by 36
(2018) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 38
Burri, H., Quesada, A., Ricci, R. P., Boriani, G., Davinelli, M., Favale, S., Costa, A. D., Kautzner, J., Moser, R., Navarro, X., et al. (2010) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.005 · Cited by 36
Managing with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators
Lampert, R. (2013) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.113.001555 · Cited by 34
“)(24) Data on the cost benefits of remote monitoring are not definitive to date.(52,56) The ongoing”
BackgroundDario, C., Delise, P., Gubian, L., Saccavini, C., BRANDOLINO, G., & Mancin, S. (2016) · Interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/ijmr.4270 · Cited by 35
“For the ICD-group, the main studies [1,4] that investigated the number of hospitalizations and the frequency of access to the emergency department, or a composite endpoint including both variables, did not show any significant reduction.”
Remote monitoring and follow-up of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in the Netherlands
de Cock, C. C., Elders, J., van Hemel, N. M., van den Broek, K., van Erven, L., de Mol, B. A. J. M., Talmon, J. L., Theuns, D. A. M. J., & de Voogt, W. (2012) · Netherlands Heart Journal · doi:10.1007/s12471-011-0239-5 · Cited by 34
Workflow, time and patient satisfaction from the perspectives of Home Monitoring
Ricci, R. P., & Morichelli, L. (2013) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eut113 · Cited by 34
Versteeg, H., Pedersen, S. S., Mastenbroek, M. H., Redekop, W. K., Schwab, J. O., Mabo, P., & Meine, M. (2014) · Netherlands Heart Journal · doi:10.1007/s12471-014-0587-z · Cited by 32
“To date, the few randomised controlled trials on remote monitoring in ICD patients that included patient-reported outcomes have yielded inconsistent results [14–16].”
ResultBraunschweig, F., Anker, S. D., Proff, J., & Varma, N. (2019) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/euz011 · Cited by 31
Home Telehealth for Chronic Disease Management: Selected Findings of a Narrative Synthesis
Jones, A., Hedges-Chou, J., Bates, J., Loyola, M., Lear, S. A., & Jarvis-Selinger, S. (2014) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0249 · Cited by 31
“Al-Khatib et al.(83) (2010), Level 2 Enrolled: 151 Analyzed: 151 Age [mean (SD)]: TG: 63 (NR) (range 54–70) CG: 63 (NR) (range, 54–72) Sex (% male): TG: 72% CG: 73% Duration: 12 months Technology: personal medical device with transmission capabilities Intervention: TG transmitted ICD data for review at 3-month interva…”
Jang, J.-P., Lin, H.-T., Chen, Y.-J., HSIEH, M., & Huang, Y. (2020) · Circulation Journal · doi:10.1253/circj.cj-20-0633 · Cited by 30
Transparent sharing of digital health data: A call to action
Slotwiner, D. J., Tarakji, K. G., Al‐Khatib, S. M., PASSMAN, R. S., Saxon, L. A., Peters, N. S., McCall, D., Turakhia, M. P., Schaeffer, J., Mendenhall, G. S., et al. (2019) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.042 · Cited by 29
Self-citationWatanabe, E., Kasai, A., Fujii, E., Yamashiro, K., & Brugada, P. (2013) · Circulation Journal · doi:10.1253/circj.cj-13-0387 · Cited by 28
Remote monitoring of heart failure: benefits for therapeutic decision making
Martirosyan, M., Çalişkan, K., Theuns, D. A. M. J., & Szili‐Törok, T. (2017) · Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy · doi:10.1080/14779072.2017.1348229 · Cited by 29
Remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices
Ganeshan, R., Enriquez, A. D., & Freeman, J. V. (2017) · Current Opinion in Cardiology · doi:10.1097/hco.0000000000000471 · Cited by 27
Kelly, S., Campbell, D., Duhn, L., Giddens, K., Gillis, A. M., AbdelWahab, A. M., Nault, I., Raj, S. R., Lockwood, E. E., Basta, J., et al. (2020) · CJC Open · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2020.11.010 · Cited by 27
Hummel, J. P., Leipold, R. J., Amorosi, S. L., Bao, H., Deger, K. A., Jones, P. W., Kansal, A. R., Ott, L. S., Stern, S., Steín, K. M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/jce.13934 · Cited by 25
“Previous cost‐effectiveness analyses from small randomized studies have shown RPM to be cost saving or neutral compared with conventional in‐office follow‐up.(23,27,35,36) Nonhospital costs were generally lower with RPM due to fewer scheduled office visits in the RPM arm (as defined by the protocol).”
BackgroundHafkamp, F. J., Tio, R. A., Otterspoor, L., Greef, T. V.-D., van Steenbergen, G. J., van de Ven, A. R. T., Smits, G., Post, H., & van Veghel, D. (2022) · Heart Failure Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10741-021-10212-8 · Cited by 24
Perings, C. A., Bauer, W., Bondke, H., Mewis, C., James, M., Böcker, D., Broadhurst, P., Korte, T., Toft, E., Hintringer, F., et al. (2011) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/euq447 · Cited by 22
Remote follow-up of pacemakers in a selected population of debilitated elderly patients
Folino, A. F., Breda, R., Calzavara, P., Borghetti, F., COMISSO, J., Iliceto, S., & Buja, G. (2012) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eus351 · Cited by 22
Success of pacemaker remote monitoring using app‐based technology: Does patient age matter?
Tarakji, K. G., Vives, C. A., Patel, A. S., Fagan, D. H., Sims, J., & Varma, N. (2018) · Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/pace.13461 · Cited by 22
Morichelli, L., Porfili, A., Quarta, L., Sassi, A., & Ricci, R. P. (2014) · Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology · doi:10.1007/s10840-014-9935-6 · Cited by 21
“Some studies reported no difference in quality of life and patient satisfaction when compared with conventional follow-up strategy [10, 11].”
ResultRuvo, E. D., Gargaro, A., Sciarra, L., Luca, L. D., Zuccaro, L. M., Stirpe, F., Rebecchi, M., Sette, A., Lioy, E., & Calò, L. (2010) · Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02932.x · Cited by 20
Sequeira, S., Jarvis, C. I., Benchouche, A., Seymour, J., & Tadmouri, A. (2020) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/euaa082 · Cited by 20
Ottenberg, A. L., Swetz, K. M., Mueller, L. A., Gerhardson, S., & Mueller, P. S. (2013) · Heart & Lung · doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.03.002 · Cited by 19
“Nevertheless, in a comparison between patients who used RM and patients who received care in clinic, Al-Khatib and colleagues (21) found satisfaction to be higher among patients who received care in clinic but only for 6 months, whereafter there was no noticeable difference.”
ResultCronin, E. M., & Varma, N. (2012) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/erd.12.18 · Cited by 17
Leppert, F., Siebermair, J., Wesemann, U., Martens, E., Sattler, S. M., Scholz, S. M., Veith, S., Greiner, W., Rassaf, T., Kääb, S., et al. (2020) · Clinical Research in Cardiology · doi:10.1007/s00392-020-01667-0 · Cited by 17
Pron, G. E., Ieraci, L., & Kaulback, K. (2012) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 17
Timmermans, I., Meine, M., Zitron, E., Widdershoven, J. W. M. G., Kimman, G., Prévôt, S., Rauwolf, T., Anselme, F., Szendey, I., Roldán, J. R., et al. (2017) · Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/pace.13123 · Cited by 16
“19 One trial assessed satisfaction with care 18 and another examined patient preferences.”
InfluentialTelemonitoring of implantable cardiac devices: hurdles towards personalised medicine
Heidbuchel, H. (2011) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.2009.188789 · Cited by 15
van der Velde, E. T., Foeken, H., Witteman, T. A., van Erven, L., & Schalij, M. J. (2012) · Netherlands Heart Journal · doi:10.1007/s12471-011-0234-x · Cited by 14
“The clinical and health economics impact of remote monitoring, however, is still under discussion [2, 3].”
Remote monitoring of patients with implanted devices: data exchange and integration
van der Velde, E. T., Atsma, D. E., Foeken, H., Witteman, T. A., & Hoekstra, W. H. G. J. (2013) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487313487483b · Cited by 14
“Remote monitoring has already been introduced in the international guidelines,(2) although the clinical and health economics impact of remote monitoring are still under discussion.(3,4) A remote monitoring system would make it possible to schedule a remote follow-up between in-clinic follow-ups.”
BackgroundMhanna, M., Beran, A., Nazir, S., Al‐Abdouh, A., Barbarawi, M., Sajdeya, O., Srour, O., Altujjar, M., Patel, R. B., & Eltahawy, E. A. (2021) · Heart Failure Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10741-021-10176-9 · Cited by 13
Mittal, S., Movsowitz, C., & Varma, N. (2014) · Cardiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2014.01.001 · Cited by 12
M�ller, A. A., Thomas, M., Wildau, H.-J., Otto, J. U., & Zugck, C. (2011) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/13329 · Cited by 12
“In contrast, Al-Khatib et al., who assigned 151 patients with an ICD to remote monitoring versus quarterly interrogations in clinic, could found no significant differences in cardiac-related resource utilization at 1 year (S. M. Al-Khatib et al., 2010).”
Sapp, J. A., Gillis, A. M., AbdelWahab, A. M., Nault, I., Nery, P. B., Healey, J. S., Raj, S. R., Lockwood, E. E., Sterns, L. D., Sears, S. F., et al. (2021) · CMAJ Open · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20200041 · Cited by 11
“%] before v. 10 [20”
Nutzenbewertung des strukturierten Telemonitorings mithilfe von aktiven Herzrhythmusimplantaten
Stockburger, M. A., Helms, T. M., Perings, C. A., Deneke, T., Köhler, F., Leonhardt, V., Muller, A. M., Piorkowski, C., Rybak, K., & Sack, S. (2017) · Der Kardiologe · doi:10.1007/s12181-017-0203-8 · Cited by 10
Impact of Remote Cardiac Monitoring on Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Bawa, D., Ahmed, A., Darden, D. J., Kabra, R., Garg, J., bansal, S. L., Olsen, E., Atkins, D., Rahim, A., Pham, N. K., et al. (2023) · JACC Advances · doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100286 · Cited by 10
Folino, A. F., Chiusso, F., Zanotto, G., Vaccari, D., GASPARINI, G., Megna, M., Marras, E., Mantovan, R., Vaglio, A., Boscolo, G., et al. (2011) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eur154 · Cited by 10
Contemporary Advances in Cardiac Remote Monitoring: A Comprehensive, Updated Mini-Review
Preda, A., Falco, R., Tognola, C., Carbonaro, M., Vargiu, S., Gallazzi, M., Baroni, M., Gigli, L., Varrenti, M., Colombo, G., et al. (2024) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina60050819 · Cited by 9
Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: What is the Evidence?
Reinhardt, A., & Ventura, R. (2023) · Current Heart Failure Reports · doi:10.1007/s11897-023-00586-1 · Cited by 10
de Graaf, G., Timmermans, I., Meine, M., Alings, M., Pedersen, S. S., Mabo, P., Zitron, E., Redekop, K., & Versteeg, H. (2022) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x221129176 · Cited by 7
Theuns, D. A. M. J., & Jordaens, L. J. L. M. (2011) · Netherlands Heart Journal · doi:10.1007/s12471-011-0228-8 · Cited by 7
“[16] 1151 12 months – – – 7%”
BackgroundAl‐Abdouh, A., Mhanna, M., Sayaideh, M. A., Barbarawi, M., Abusnina, W. A., Jabri, A., Alzu’bi, H., Rmilah, A. A. A., Haq, I.-U., Kumar, A., et al. (2022) · Current Heart Failure Reports · doi:10.1007/s11897-022-00579-6 · Cited by 6
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Follow-up
Linde, C. M., & Braunschweig, F. (2015) · Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccep.2015.08.010 · Cited by 6
Raes, S., Prezzi, A., Willems, R., Heidbüchel, H., & Annemans, L. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/47616 · Cited by 5
“%) investigated a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) or quality of life (QOL) difference [11,26-30, 33,34].”
InfluentialAutomatic remote monitoring: is there a need?
Varma, N., & Brugada, P. (2013) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eut117 · Cited by 5
FREEDBERG, N. A., & Feldman, A. Z. (2014) · Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/jce.12415 · Cited by 5
Laksman, Z., Krahn, A. D., Dorian, P., Simpson, C. S., Crystal, E., Healey, J. S., Khaykin, Y., Wang, X., & Lee, D. S. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2014.03.028 · Cited by 5
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Follow-up
Linde, C. M., & Braunschweig, F. (2016) · Heart Failure Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.hfc.2016.07.020 · Cited by 5
Callum, K., Graune, C., Bowman, E., Molden, E., & Leslie, S. J. (2021) · World Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.4330/wjc.v13.i3.46 · Cited by 5
Lampert, R. J. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.110.991687 · Cited by 5
Veres, B., Kiss, B., Fehérvári, P., Engh, M. A., Hegyi, P., Zima, E., Merkely, B. P., & Kosztin, A. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14124278 · Cited by 4
Remote monitoring of ICDs and CRTs
Varma, N. (2013) · Journal of Arrhythmia · doi:10.1016/j.joa.2013.05.001 · Cited by 4
“This is because they demand coordination with a device clinic on a calendar-based schedule, are cumbersome to use, challenge compliance and increase service burden without offering gain [6,7].”
BackgroundWpływ kardiowertera-defibrylatora na jakość życia — przegląd badań
Kuśmierz, M., Wleklik, M., Uchmanowicz, I., & Jaroch, J. (2016) · Folia Cardiologica · doi:10.5603/fc.2016.0004 · Cited by 4
“[63] (151 pacjentów) wykazali niższą ocenę QoL w 6.”
Tan, V. H., Tow, H. X. S., Fong, K. Y., Wang, Y., Yeo, C., Ching, C. K., & Lim, T. W. (2024) · Journal of Arrhythmia · doi:10.1002/joa3.13054 · Cited by 4
Varma, N. (2013) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eut065 · Cited by 4
Advances in implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
Rickard, J., & Wilkoff, B. L. (2015) · Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy · doi:10.1586/14779072.2016.1131124 · Cited by 3
Cascini, F., Pantović, A., Al‐Ajlouni, Y. A., Ta’ani, O. A., Failla, G., Melnyk, A., Barach, P. R., & Ricciardi, W. (2023) · Telehealth and Medicine Today · doi:10.30953/thmt.v8.415 · Cited by 4
Devicebasiertes Telemonitoring
Duncker, D., Michalski, R., Müller‐Leisse, J., Zormpas, C., König, T., & Veltmann, C. (2017) · Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie · doi:10.1007/s00399-017-0521-3 · Cited by 3
“Ein entsprechendes Positionspapier der European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) zu Definition, Vorgehen und Management devicedetektierter subklinischeratrialerTachyarrhythmienwurde kürzlichveröffentlicht [21].”
InfluentialCost accounting del follow-up annuo per il controllo remoto dei defibrillatori impiantabili
Calò, L., Chirico, A., & Palozzi, G. (2014) · MECOSAN · doi:10.3280/mesa2014-090005 · Cited by 3
van Steenbergen, G. J., Jaddi, O. B., Theuns, D. A. M. J., van Veghel, D., Dekker, L., & Simmers, T. (2021) · Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/pace.14390 · Cited by 2
Adenosine test during confined pulmonary vein fibrillation: how to identify the dormant conduction?
Miyazaki, S., Kusa, S., & Iesaka, Y. (2013) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eut035 · Cited by 2
Franke, J., Zugck, C., & Katus, H. A. (2013) · Der Kardiologe · doi:10.1007/s12181-013-0514-3 · Cited by 2
Advances in Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardiac Devices
Varma, N., & Wilkoff, B. L. (2011) · Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccep.2011.05.011 · Cited by 1
Cascini, F., Pantović, A., Al‐Ajlouni, Y. A., Ta'ani, O. A., Failla, G., Melnyk, A., Barach, P. R., & Ricciardi, W. (2023) · Telehealth and Medicine Today · doi:10.30953/tmt.v8.415 · Cited by 1
Follow-up Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
Varma, N. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4377-1616-0.00032-1 · Cited by 1
A telemonitorozás lehetőségei beültethető kardiális elektronikus eszközökkel
Zima, E., Dér, G., Bárány, T., Németh, T., Molnár, L., Osztheimer, I., Szilágyi, S., Király, Á., Papp, R., Tarjanyi, Z., et al. (2017) · Cardiologia Hungarica · doi:10.26430/chungarica.2017.47.4.281 · Cited by 1
Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
Zeitler, E. P., Greenfield, R. A., & Piccini, J. P. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-44733-1.00122-x · Cited by 1
Self-citationRemote Heart Rhythm Monitoring
Gomes, J. A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-45066-3_35 · Cited by 1
van der Velde, E. T., Foeken, H., Witteman, T. A., van Erven, L., & Schalij, M. J. (2011)
Chen, J. (2014) · Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccep.2014.03.001
Zanaboni, P., Landolina, M., Borghetti, F., Borghi, G., & di Carlo, S. (2014)
Metadata
- Authors
- AL‐KHATIB, S. M., PICCINI, J. P., KNIGHT, D., STEWART, M., CLAPP‐CHANNING, N., & SANDERS, G. D.
- Affiliations
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Duke Clinical Research Institute (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 545-550
- ISSN
- 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8167
- OpenAlex
- W2086481724
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
- Keywords
- implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, remote monitoring, device interrogation, ICD follow-up, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, health care costs, resource utilization (health care), cardiovascular hospitalization, emergency department visits
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cost Control, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Office Visits, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Telephone, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Defibrillators, Implantable, Endpoint Determination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review