Cited by 120Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Effect of telemonitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices on healthcare utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with heart failure

Open access
Klersy, Catherine, Boriani, Giuseppe, De Silvestri, Annalisa, Mairesse, Georges H., Braunschweig, Frieder, Scotti, Valeria, Balduini, Anna, Cowie, Martin R. +2 more·2016·European Journal of Heart Failure

Abstract

Aims: Implantable device telemonitoring (DTM) is a diagnostic adjunct to traditional face-to-face hospital visits. Remote device follow-up and earlier diagnoses facilitated by DTM should reduce healthcare utilization. We explored whether DTM reduces healthcare utilization over standard of care (SoC), without compromising patient outcomes. Methods and results: This systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials on DTM in patients with heart failure consisted of 5702 patients, with a median of 117 [interquartile range (IQR) 76–331] patients per study [age 65 years (IQR 63–67)] and follow-up range of 12–36 months. DTM was associated with a reduction in total number of visits [planned, unplanned, and emergency room (ER)] [relative risk (RR) 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43–0.73, P < 0.001]. Rates of cardiac hospitalizations (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.82–1.12, P = 0.60) and the composite endpoints of ER, unplanned hospital visits, or hospitalizations (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.68–1.43, P = 0.96) was similar between the DTM and the SoC groups. An increase in the total number of ER or unscheduled visits (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.11–1.70, P = 0.004) was observed. This effect was consistent and statistically significant for all studies. Total and cardiac mortality were similar between the groups (DTM RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.69–1.16, P = 0.41; and DTM RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.51–1.69, P = 0.80). Monetary costs favoured DTM (10–55% reduction in five studies). Conclusions: Compared with SoC, DTM is associated with a marked reduction in planned hospital visits. In addition, DTM was associated with lower monetary costs, despite a modest increase in unplanned hospital and ER visits. DTM did not compromise survival.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejhf.470

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four reviews, including two high-quality reviews, found no difference between remote monitoring with telephone support and face-to-face care to reduce planned hospital visits and to improve modifiable cardiovascular risk factors through cardiac rehabilitation.

    “Four reviews, including two high-quality reviews [1, 22] found no difference between remote monitoring with telephone support and face-to-face care to reduce planned hospital visits and to improve modifiable cardiovascular risk factors through cardiac rehabilitation [22–24].”

    From Telemedicine in the OECD: An umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation (2020) · cites this paper as [22]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 2 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klersy, C., Boriani, G., De Silvestri, A., Mairesse, G. H., Braunschweig, F., Scotti, V., Balduini, A., Cowie, M. R., Leyva, F., & for the Health Economics Committee of the European Heart Rhythm Association
Affiliations
  • Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • Service of Biometry & Statistics, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S Matteo , Pavia ,
  • Cliniques du Sud Luxembourg (BE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Centre for Scientific Documentation, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S Matteo , Pavia ,
  • Aston University (GB)
Corresponding author
Leyva, Francisco
Venue
European Journal of Heart Failure
Published
2016-01-27
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
195-204
ISSN
  • 1388-9842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-0844
OpenAlex
W2281462524
Cited by
120
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
cardiac implantable electronic devices, heart failure, health care utilization, hospitalization, emergency department visits, unplanned hospital visits, health care costs, mortality, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Health Care Costs, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review