Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Mapping Approach To Diagnose Electrical Rotors and Focal Impulse Sources for Human Atrial Fibrillation

Open access
NARAYAN, SANJIV M., KRUMMEN, DAVID E., RAPPEL, WOUTER‐JAN·2012·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Computational Mapping of Rotors and Focal Impulses in Human AF. Introduction: The perpetuating mechanisms for human atrial fibrillation (AF) remain undefined. Localized rotors and focal beat sources may sustain AF in elegant animal models, but there has been no direct evidence for localized sources in human AF using traditional methods. We developed a clinical computational mapping approach, guided by human atrial tissue physiology, to reveal sources of human AF. Methods and Results: In 49 AF patients referred for ablation (62 ± 9 years; 30 persistent), we defined repolarization dynamics using monophasic action potentials (MAPs) and recorded AF activation from 64‐pole basket catheters in left atrium and, in n = 20 patients, in both atria. Careful positioning of basket catheters was required for optimal mapping. AF electrograms at 64–128 electrodes were combined with repolarization and conduction dynamics to construct spatiotemporal AF maps. We observed sustained sources in 47/49 patients, in the form of electrical rotors (n = 57) and focal beats (n = 11) that controlled local atrial activation with peripheral wavebreak (fibrillatory conduction). Patients with persistent AF had more sources than those with paroxysmal AF (2.1 ± 1.0 vs 1.5 ± 0.8, P = 0.02), related to shorter cycle length (163 ± 19 milliseconds vs 187 ± 25 milliseconds, P < 0.001). Approximately one‐quarter of sources lay in the right atrium. Conclusions: Physiologically guided computational mapping revealed sustained electrical rotors and repetitive focal beats during human AF for the first time. These localized sources were present in 96% of AF patients, and controlled AF activity. These results provide novel mechanistic insights into human AF and lay the foundation for mechanistically tailored approaches to AF ablation. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 447‐454, May 2012)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02332.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
NARAYAN, S. M., KRUMMEN, D. E., & RAPPEL, W.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-26
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
447-454
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W1545558253
Cited by
332
References
31
FWCI
26.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Mapping Approach To Diagnose Electrical Rotors and Focal Impulse Sources for Human Atrial Fibrillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02332.x
The paper
NARAYAN, S. M., KRUMMEN, D. E., & RAPPEL, W. (2012). Clinical Mapping Approach To Diagnose Electrical Rotors and Focal Impulse Sources for Human Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02332.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.