Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Health‐Affecting Compounds in Brassicaceae

Jahangir, Muhammad, Kim, Hye K., Choi, Young H., Verpoorte, Robert·2009·Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Brassicaceae vegetables are considered to be a staple food in many areas all over the world. Brassica species are not only known for their high fat and protein contents for human and animal consumption, but Brassicaceae vegetables are recognized as a rich source of nutrients such as vitamins (carotenoids, tocopherol, ascorbic acid, folic acid), minerals (Cu, Zn, P, Mg, among others), carbohydrates (sucrose and glucose), amino acids (for example, L‐alanine, L‐aspartic acid, L‐glutamic acid, L‐glutamine, L‐histidine, L‐methionine, L‐phenylalanine, L‐threonine, L‐tryptophan, and L‐valine), and different groups of phytochemicals such as indole phytoalexins (brassinin, spirobrassinin, brassilexin, camalexin, 1‐methoxyspirobrassinin, 1‐methoxyspirobrassinol, and methoxyspirobrassinol methyl ether), phenolics (such as feruloyl and isoferuloylcholine, hydroxybenzoic, neochlorogenic, chlorogenic, caffeic, p ‐coumaric, ferulic, and sinapic acids, anthocyanins, quercetin, and kaempferol), and glucosinolates (mainly glucoiberin, glucoraphanin, glucoalyssin, gluconapin, glucobrassicanapin, glucobrassicin, gluconasturtiin, and neoglucobrassicin). All of these phytochemicals contribute to the reported antioxidant, anticarcinogenic, and cardiovascular protective activities of Brassica vegetables. However, not all members of this family are equal from a nutritional viewpoint, since significant qualitative variations in the phytochemical profiles of Brassica species and varieties suggest differences in the health‐promoting properties among these vegetables. In this article, Brassica phytochemicals with their nutritional value and health‐promoting activities are discussed to give an overview of the literature for Brassica as a staple crop.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2008.00065.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Jahangir, M., Kim, H. K., Choi, Y. H., & Verpoorte, R.
Venue
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03-23
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
31-43
ISSN
1541-4337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072288777
Cited by
311
References
3
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health‐Affecting Compounds in Brassicaceae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2008.00065.x
The paper
Jahangir, M., Kim, H. K., Choi, Y. H., & Verpoorte, R. (2009). Health‐Affecting Compounds in Brassicaceae. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2008.00065.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.