Cited by 26Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Parents' Experiences, Reactions and Needs Regarding a Nonviable Fetus Diagnosed at a Second Trimester Routine Ultrasound

Ekelin, Maria, Crang-Svalenius, Elizabeth, Nordström, Berit, Dykes, Anna-Karin·2008·Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing

Abstract

Objective To conceptualize women's and their partners' experiences and ways of handling the situation before, during, and after second trimester ultrasound examination with the diagnosis of a nonviable fetus.Design A grounded theory study.Setting A Swedish regional hospital.Participants Nine women and 6 men (n=15) were interviewed within a year of the event.Results The core category was Unexpected change in life. Four categories that were encompassed by the core category emerged: (a) Deceived by a false sense of security; (b) Confronting reality; (c) Grieving; and (d) Reorientation.Conclusion These parents were unprepared for the diagnosis of a nonviable fetus. In addition to the crisis reaction, they realized that the sense of security they had experienced was false. As different care givers were involved, the need for a care plan was evident. Support from care givers was a very important factor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00258.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ekelin, M., Crang-Svalenius, E., Nordström, B., & Dykes, A.-K.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ekelin, Maria
Venue
Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
446-454
ISSN
  • 0090-0311 (ISSN-L)
  • 0884-2175
OpenAlex
W2170193925
Cited by
26
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
second-trimester ultrasound, parental experiences, grief, crisis reactions, false sense of security, care planning, caregiver support
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aftercare, Attitude to Health, Empathy, Female, Fetal Death, Grief, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Models, Psychological, Parents, Patient Care Planning, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Sweden, Nursing Methodology Research, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Maternal-Child Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review